Suzuki, K. et al. In vivo genome editing via CRISPR/Cas9 mediated homology-independent targeted integration. Nature 540, 144–149 (2016).
Yamamoto, Y. & Gerbi, S. A. Making ends meet: targeted integration of DNA fragments by genome editing. Chromosoma 127, 405–420 (2018).
Anzalone, A. V. et al. Programmable deletion, replacement, integration and inversion of large DNA sequences with twin prime editing. Nat. Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-021-01133-w (2021).
Lin, Q. et al. High-efficiency prime editing with optimized, paired pegRNAs in plants. Nat. Biotechnol. 39, 923–927 (2021).
Jiang, T., Zhang, X.-O., Weng, Z. & Xue, W. Deletion and replacement of long genomic sequences using prime editing. Nat. Biotechnol. 40, 227–234 (2022).
Wang, J. et al. Efficient targeted insertion of large DNA fragments without DNA donors. Nat. Methods 19, 331–340 (2022).
Landrum, M. J. et al. ClinVar: public archive of relationships among sequence variation and human phenotype. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, D980–D985 (2014).
Jasin, M. & Haber, J. E. The democratization of gene editing: insights from site-specific cleavage and double-strand break repair. DNA Rep. 44, 6–16 (2016).
Haapaniemi, E., Botla, S., Persson, J., Schmierer, B. & Taipale, J. CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing induces a p53-mediated DNA damage response. Nat. Med. 24, 927–930 (2018).
Ihry, R. J. et al. p53 inhibits CRISPR-Cas9 engineering in human pluripotent stem cells. Nat. Med. 24, 939–946 (2018).
Paquet, D. et al. Efficient introduction of specific homozygous and heterozygous mutations using CRISPR/Cas9. Nature 533, 125–129 (2016).
Maruyama, T. et al. Increasing the efficiency of precise genome editing with CRISPR-Cas9 by inhibition of nonhomologous end joining. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 538–542 (2015).
Ferrari, S. et al. Efficient gene editing of human long-term hematopoietic stem cells validated by clonal tracking. Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 1298–1308 (2020).
Witte, I. P. et al. Programmable gene insertion in human cells with a laboratory-evolved CRISPR-associated transposase. Science 388, eadt5199 (2025).
Anzalone, A. V. et al. Search-and-replace genome editing without double-strand breaks or donor DNA. Nature 576, 149–157 (2019).
Yarnall, M. T. N. et al. Drag-and-drop genome insertion of large sequences without double-strand DNA cleavage using CRISPR-directed integrases. Nat. Biotechnol. 41, 500–512 (2023).
Pandey, S. et al. Efficient site-specific integration of large genes in mammalian cells via continuously evolved recombinases and prime editing. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 9, 22–39 (2025).
Keravala, A. et al. Mutational derivatives of PhiC31 integrase with increased efficiency and specificity. Mol. Ther. 17, 112–120 (2009).
Liu, B. et al. A split prime editor with untethered reverse transcriptase and circular RNA template. Nat. Biotechnol. 40, 1388–1393 (2022).
Liu, B. et al. Targeted genome editing with a DNA-dependent DNA polymerase and exogenous DNA-containing templates. Nat. Biotechnol. 42, 1039–1045 (2024).
Zheng, C. et al. A flexible split prime editor using truncated reverse transcriptase improves dual-AAV delivery in mouse liver. Mol. Ther. 30, 1343–1351 (2022).
Liu, P. et al. Improved prime editors enable pathogenic allele correction and cancer modelling in adult mice. Nat. Commun. 12, 2121 (2021).
Jang, H. et al. Application of prime editing to the correction of mutations and phenotypes in adult mice with liver and eye diseases. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 6, 181–194 (2021).
Yan, J. et al. Improving prime editing with an endogenous small RNA-binding protein. Nature 628, 639–647 (2024).
Mathis, N. et al. Predicting prime editing efficiency and product purity by deep learning. Nat. Biotechnol. 41, 1151–1159 (2023).
Yew, N. S. et al. CpG-depleted plasmid DNA vectors with enhanced safety and long-term gene expression in vivo. Mol. Ther. 5, 731–738 (2002).
Tao, R. et al. WT-PE: prime editing with nuclease wild-type Cas9 enables versatile large-scale genome editing. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 7, 108 (2022).
Ferreira da Silva, J. et al. Click editing enables programmable genome writing using DNA polymerases and HUH endonucleases. Nat. Biotechnol. 43, 923–935 (2025).
Zheng, C. et al. Template-jumping prime editing enables large insertion and exon rewriting in vivo. Nat. Commun. 14, 3369 (2023).
Choi, J. et al. Precise genomic deletions using paired prime editing. Nat. Biotechnol. 40, 218–226 (2022).
Zhuang, Y. et al. Increasing the efficiency and precision of prime editing with guide RNA pairs. Nat. Chem. Biol. 18, 29–37 (2022).
Wang, C. et al. High-efficiency targeted transgene integration via primed micro-homologues. Cell Discov. 9, 69 (2023).
Doman, J. L. et al. Phage-assisted evolution and protein engineering yield compact, efficient prime editors. Cell 186, 3983–4002 (2023).
Liang, S.-Q. et al. Genome-wide profiling of prime editor off-target sites in vitro and in vivo using PE-tag. Nat. Methods 20, 898–907 (2023).
Giannoukos, G. et al. UDiTaSTM, a genome editing detection method for indels and genome rearrangements. BMC Genom. 19, 212 (2018).
Chen, P. J. et al. Enhanced prime editing systems by manipulating cellular determinants of editing outcomes. Cell 184, 5635–5652 (2021).
Ferreira da Silva, J. et al. Prime editing efficiency and fidelity are enhanced in the absence of mismatch repair. Nat. Commun. 13, 760 (2022).
Gibson, D. G. et al. Enzymatic assembly of DNA molecules up to several hundred kilobases. Nat. Methods 6, 343–345 (2009).
Wimberger, S. et al. Simultaneous inhibition of DNA-PK and Polϴ improves integration efficiency and precision of genome editing. Nat. Commun. 14, 4761 (2023).
Pugliano, C. M. et al. DNA-PK inhibition enhances gene editing efficiency in HSPCs for CRISPR-based treatment of X-linked hyper IgM syndrome. Mol. Ther. Methods Clin. Dev. 32, 101297 (2024).
Eyquem, J. et al. Targeting a CAR to the TRAC locus with CRISPR/Cas9 enhances tumour rejection. Nature 543, 113–117 (2017).
Levesque, S. et al. In cellulo DNA assembly for targeted genomic integration and rearrangement in human cells. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.06.16.659926 (2025).
Zheng, C., Zhang, G., Dean, L. J., Sontheimer, E. J. & Xue, W. The reverse transcriptase domain of prime editors contributes to DNA repair in mammalian cells. Nat. Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-025-02568-1 (2025).
Cullot, G. et al. Genome editing with the HDR-enhancing DNA-PKcs inhibitor AZD7648 causes large-scale genomic alterations. Nat. Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-024-02488-6 (2024).
Li, X. et al. Highly efficient prime editing by introducing same-sense mutations in pegRNA or stabilizing its structure. Nat. Commun. 13, 1669 (2022).
Nelson, J. W. et al. Engineered pegRNAs improve prime editing efficiency. Nat. Biotechnol. 40, 402–410 (2022).
Tao, R. et al. Bi-PE: bi-directional priming improves CRISPR/Cas9 prime editing in mammalian cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 50, 6423–6434 (2022).
Langmead, B. & Salzberg, S. L. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods 9, 357–359 (2012).
Smith, T., Heger, A. & Sudbery, I. UMI-tools: modeling sequencing errors in unique molecular identifiers to improve quantification accuracy. Genome Res. 27, 491–499 (2017).
Ramírez, F., Dündar, F., Diehl, S., Grüning, B. A. & Manke, T. deepTools: a flexible platform for exploring deep-sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, W187–W191 (2014).
Rohland, N. & Reich, D. Cost-effective, high-throughput DNA sequencing libraries for multiplexed target capture. Genome Res. 22, 939–946 (2012).
Li, H. Minimap2: pairwise alignment for nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics 34, 3094–3100 (2018).
Li, H. New strategies to improve minimap2 alignment accuracy. Bioinformatics 37, 4572–4574 (2021).
