Anzalone, A. V. et al. Search-and-replace genome editing without double-strand breaks or donor DNA. Nature 576, 149–157 (2019).
Anzalone, A. V. et al. Programmable deletion, replacement, integration and inversion of large DNA sequences with twin prime editing. Nat. Biotechnol. 40, 731–740 (2022).
Wang, J. et al. Efficient targeted insertion of large DNA fragments without DNA donors. Nat. Methods 19, 331–340 (2022).
Yarnall, M. T. N. et al. Drag-and-drop genome insertion of large sequences without double-strand DNA cleavage using CRISPR-directed integrases. Nat. Biotechnol. 41, 500–512 (2023).
Pandey, S. et al. Efficient site-specific integration of large genes in mammalian cells via continuously evolved recombinases and prime editing. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 9, 22–39 (2025).
Witte, I. P. et al. Programmable gene insertion in human cells with a laboratory-evolved CRISPR-associated transposase. Science 388, eadt5199 (2025).
Komor, A. C., Kim, Y. B., Packer, M. S., Zuris, J. A. & Liu, D. R. Programmable editing of a target base in genomic DNA without double-stranded DNA cleavage. Nature 533, 420–424 (2016).
Gaudelli, N. M. et al. Programmable base editing of A•T to G•C in genomic DNA without DNA cleavage. Nature 551, 464–471 (2017).
Sousa, A. A. et al. In vivo prime editing rescues alternating hemiplegia of childhood in mice. Cell 188, 4275–4294.e23 (2025).
Gillmore, J. D. et al. CRISPR-Cas9 in vivo gene editing for transthyretin amyloidosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 385, 493–502 (2021).
Suzuki, K. et al. In vivo genome editing via CRISPR/Cas9 mediated homology-independent targeted integration. Nature 540, 144–149 (2016).
Maresca, M., Lin, V. G., Guo, N. & Yang, Y. Obligate ligation-gated recombination (ObLiGaRe): custom-designed nuclease-mediated targeted integration through nonhomologous end joining. Genome Res. 23, 539–546 (2013).
Paquet, D. et al. Efficient introduction of specific homozygous and heterozygous mutations using CRISPR/Cas9. Nature 533, 125–129 (2016).
Kosicki, M., Tomberg, K. & Bradley, A. Repair of double-strand breaks induced by CRISPR-Cas9 leads to large deletions and complex rearrangements. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 765–771 (2018).
Takata, M. et al. Homologous recombination and non-homologous end-joining pathways of DNA double-strand break repair have overlapping roles in the maintenance of chromosomal integrity in vertebrate cells. EMBO J. 17, 5497–5508 (1998).
Smirnikhina, S. A., Zaynitdinova, M. I., Sergeeva, V. A. & Lavrov, A. V. Improving homology-directed repair in genome editing experiments by influencing the cell cycle. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23, 5992 (2022).
Hew, B. E. et al. Directed evolution of hyperactive integrases for site specific insertion of transgenes. Nucleic Acids Res. 52, e64 (2024).
Xu, Z. et al. Accuracy and efficiency define Bxb1 integrase as the best of fifteen candidate serine recombinases for the integration of DNA into the human genome. BMC Biotechnol. 13, 87 (2013).
Romano, G., Marino, I. R., Pentimalli, F., Adamo, V. & Giordano, A. Insertional mutagenesis and development of malignancies induced by integrating gene delivery systems: implications for the design of safer gene-based interventions in patients. Drug News Perspect. 22, 185–196 (2009).
Strecker, J. et al. RNA-guided DNA insertion with CRISPR-associated transposases. Science 365, 48–53 (2019).
Zhang, R. et al. Amplification editing enables efficient and precise duplication of DNA from short sequence to megabase and chromosomal scale. Cell 187, 3936–3952 (2024).
Doman, J. L. et al. Phage-assisted evolution and protein engineering yield compact, efficient prime editors. Cell 186, 3983–4002 (2023).
Chen, P. J. et al. Enhanced prime editing systems by manipulating cellular determinants of editing outcomes. Cell 184, 5635–5652 (2021).
Yan, J. et al. Improving prime editing with an endogenous small RNA-binding protein. Nature 628, 639–647 (2024).
Lampe, G. D., Liang, A. R., Zhang, D. J., Fernández, I. S. & Sternberg, S. H. Structure-guided engineering of type I-F CASTs for targeted gene insertion in human cells. Nat. Commun. 16, 7891 (2025).
Tsai, S. Q. et al. GUIDE-seq enables genome-wide profiling of off-target cleavage by CRISPR-Cas nucleases. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 187–197 (2015).
Park, J. et al. Digenome-seq web tool for profiling CRISPR specificity. Nat. Methods 14, 548–549 (2017).
Duan, M. et al. TOPO-seq reveals DNA topology-induced off-target activity by Cas9 and base editors. Nat. Chem. Biol. 21, 1554–1564 (2025).
Braal, C. L. et al. Inhibiting CDK4/6 in breast cancer with palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib: similarities and differences. Drugs 81, 317–331 (2021).
Crozier, L. et al. CDK4/6 inhibitors induce replication stress to cause long-term cell cycle withdrawal. EMBO J. 41, e108599 (2022).
Wang, R. C. & Wang, Z. Synchronization of cultured cells to G1, S, G2, and M phases by double thymidine block. Methods Mol. Biol. 2579, 61–71 (2022).
Chen, G. & Deng, X. Cell synchronization by double thymidine block. Bio Protoc. 8, e2994 (2018).
Li, G., Yang, X., Luo, X., Wu, Z. & Yang, H. Modulation of cell cycle increases CRISPR-mediated homology-directed DNA repair. Cell Biosci. 13, 215 (2023).
Lei, X. et al. Rapid generation of long, chemically modified pegRNAs for prime editing. Nat. Biotechnol. 43, 1156–1167 (2025).
Cerbin, S. & Jiang, N. Duplication of host genes by transposable elements. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 49, 63–69 (2018).
Skala, A. M. Retroviral DNA transposition: themes and variations. Microbiol. Spectr. 2, MDNA3-0005-2014 (2014).
Kahyo, T., Yamada, H., Tao, H., Kurabe, N. & Sugimura, H. Insertionally polymorphic sites of human endogenous retrovirus-K (HML-2) with long target site duplications. BMC Genom. 18, 487 (2017).
Ewing, A. D. Transposable element detection from whole genome sequence data. Mob. DNA 6, 24 (2015).
Serrao, E., Ballandras-Colas, A., Cherepanov, P., Maertens, G. N. & Engelman, A. N. Key determinants of target DNA recognition by retroviral intasomes. Retrovirology 12, 39 (2015).
Sohrab, V., López-Díaz, C., Di Pietro, A., Ma, L. J. & Ayhan, D. H. TEfinder: a bioinformatics pipeline for detecting new transposable element insertion events in next-generation sequencing data. Genes 12, 224 (2021).
Devine, S. E., Chissoe, S. L., Eby, Y., Wilson, R. K. & Boeke, J. D. A transposon-based strategy for sequencing repetitive DNA in eukaryotic genomes. Genome Res. 7, 551–563 (1997).
Linheiro, R. S. & Bergman, C. M. Whole genome resequencing reveals natural target site preferences of transposable elements in Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS ONE 7, e30008 (2012).
Yao, X. et al. Homology-mediated end joining-based targeted integration using CRISPR/Cas9. Cell Res. 27, 801–814 (2017).
Shy, B. R. et al. High-yield genome engineering in primary cells using a hybrid ssDNA repair template and small-molecule cocktails. Nat. Biotechnol. 41, 521–531 (2023).
Miyaoka, Y. et al. Systematic quantification of HDR and NHEJ reveals effects of locus, nuclease, and cell type on genome-editing. Sci. Rep. 6, 23549 (2016).
Iyama, T. & Wilson, D. M. III DNA repair mechanisms in dividing and non-dividing cells. DNA Repair 12, 620–636 (2013).
Frock, R. L., Sadeghi, C., Meng, J. & Wang, J. L. DNA end joining: G0-ing to the core. Biomolecules 11, 1487 (2021).
Yu, W. et al. Repair of G1 induced DNA double-strand breaks in S-G2/M by alternative NHEJ. Nat. Commun. 11, 5239 (2020).
An, J. et al. Enhancement of the viability of T cells electroporated with DNA via osmotic dampening of the DNA-sensing cGAS-STING pathway. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 8, 149–164 (2024).
Zhang, C. P. et al. Efficient non-viral delivery of macromolecules in human primary hematopoietic stem cells and lymphocytes. J. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, mjad018 (2023).
Zhang, A. et al. Efficient and precise inversion of genomic DNA from large to chromosomal scale. Nat. Chem. Biol. 22, 328–339 (2025).
Ji, R. J. et al. Epitope prime editing shields hematopoietic cells from CD123 immunotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia. Cell Stem Cell 31, 1650–1666 (2024).
Wang, G. et al. mRNA produced by VSW-3 RNAP has high-level translation efficiency with low inflammatory stimulation. Cell Insight 1, 100056 (2022).
Tong, X. et al. Structure-guided design of Cas12a variants improves detection of nucleic acids. Cell Insight 4, 100228 (2025).
Chen, S., Zhou, Y., Chen, Y. & Gu, J. fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics 34, i884–i890 (2018).
Bolger, A. M., Lohse, M. & Usadel, B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30, 2114–2120 (2014).
Clement, K. et al. CRISPResso2 provides accurate and rapid genome editing sequence analysis. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 224–226 (2019).
Shi, Y. J. et al. DNA topology regulates PAM-Cas9 interaction and DNA unwinding to enable near-PAMless cleavage by thermophilic Cas9. Mol. Cell 82, 4160–4175 (2022).
Kim, D., Kang, B. C. & Kim, J. S. Identifying genome-wide off-target sites of CRISPR RNA-guided nucleases and deaminases with Digenome-seq. Nat. Protoc. 16, 1170–1192 (2021).
Li, H. & Durbin, R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25, 1754–1760 (2009).
Su, X. et al. The promising role of nanopore sequencing in cancer diagnostics and treatment. Cell Insight 4, 100229 (2025).
Robinson, J. T. et al. Integrative Genomics Viewer. Nat. Biotechnol. 29, 24–26 (2011).
