IPCC Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).
Rubino, M. et al. Revised records of atmospheric trace gases CO2, CH4, N2O, and δ13C-CO2 over the last 2000 years from Law Dome, Antarctica. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 11, 473–492 (2019).
Mitchell, L., Brook, E., Lee, J. E., Buizert, C. & Sowers, T. Constraints on the late Holocene anthropogenic contribution to the atmospheric methane budget. Science 342, 964–966 (2013).
Dlugokencky, E. J., Nisbet, E. G., Fisher, R. & Lowry, D. Global atmospheric methane: budget, changes and dangers. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 369, 2058–2072 (2011).
Dlugokencky, E. J., Masarie, K. A., Tans, P. P., Conway, T. J. & Xiong, X. Is the amplitude of the methane seasonal cycle changing? Atmos. Environ. 31, 21–26 (1997).
Dowd, E. et al. Decreasing seasonal cycle amplitude of methane in the northern high latitudes being driven by lower-latitude changes in emissions and transport. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 23, 7363–7382 (2023).
Peng, S. et al. Wetland emission and atmospheric sink changes explain methane growth in 2020. Nature 612, 477–482 (2022).
Zhang, Z. et al. Recent intensification of wetland methane feedback. Nat. Clim. Change 13, 430–433 (2023).
Yuan, K. et al. Boreal–Arctic wetland methane emissions modulated by warming and vegetation activity. Nat. Clim. Change 14, 282–288 (2024).
Naus, S. et al. Constraints and biases in a tropospheric two-box model of OH. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 19, 407–424 (2019).
Skeie, R. B., Hodnebrog, Ø. & Myhre, G. Trends in atmospheric methane concentrations since 1990 were driven and modified by anthropogenic emissions. Commun. Earth Environ. 4, 317 (2023).
Lan, X., Thoning, K. W. & Dlugokencky, E. J. Trends in globally-averaged CH4, N2O, and SF6 determined from NOAA Global Monitoring Laboratory measurements. Version 2024-06. NOAA Global Monitoring Laboratory https://doi.org/10.15138/P8XG-AA10 (2024).
Dlugokencky, E. J. et al. Atmospheric methane levels off: temporary pause or a new steady-state? Geophys. Res. Lett. 30, 1992 (2003).
Nisbet, E. G. et al. Very strong atmospheric methane growth in the 4 years 2014–2017: implications for the Paris Agreement. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 33, 318–342 (2019).
Saunois, M. et al. The global methane budget 2000–2017. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 12, 1561–1623 (2020).
Lan, X. et al. Improved constraints on global methane emissions and sinks using δ13C-CH4. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 35, e2021GB007000 (2021).
Schaefer, H. et al. A 21st-century shift from fossil-fuel to biogenic methane emissions indicated by 13CH4. Science 352, 80–84 (2016).
Turner, A. J., Frankenberg, C., Wennberg, P. O. & Jacob, D. J. Ambiguity in the causes for decadal trends in atmospheric methane and hydroxyl. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 5367–5372 (2017).
Basu, S. et al. Estimating emissions of methane consistent with atmospheric measurements of methane and δ13C of methane. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 22, 15351–15377 (2022).
Keeling, C. D., Chin, J. F. S. & Whorf, T. P. Increased activity of northern vegetation inferred from atmospheric CO2 measurements. Nature 382, 146–149 (1996).
Graven, H. D. et al. Enhanced seasonal exchange of CO2 by northern ecosystems since 1960. Science 341, 1085–1089 (2013).
Zeng, N. et al. Agricultural Green Revolution as a driver of increasing atmospheric CO2 seasonal amplitude. Nature 515, 394–397 (2014).
Forkel, M. et al. Enhanced seasonal CO2 exchange caused by amplified plant productivity in northern ecosystems. Science 351, 696–699 (2016).
Thoning, K. W., Tans, P. P. & Komhyr, W. D. Atmospheric carbon dioxide at Mauna Loa Observatory: 2. Analysis of the NOAA GMCC data, 1974–1985. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 94, 8549–8565 (1989).
McKain, K. et al. NOAA Global Greenhouse Gas Reference Network Flask-Air PFP Sample Measurements of CO2, CH4, CO, N2O, H2, SF6 and isotopic ratios collected from aircraft vertical profiles [Data set]. Version: 2023-08-11. NOAA Global Monitoring Laboratory https://doi.org/10.15138/39HR-9N34 (2023).
Rantanen, M. et al. The Arctic has warmed nearly four times faster than the globe since 1979. Commun. Earth Environ. 3, 168 (2022).
Bintanja, R. et al. Strong future increases in Arctic precipitation variability linked to poleward moisture transport. Sci. Adv. 6, eaax6869 (2020).
Lin, X. et al. Recent methane surges reveal heightened emissions from tropical inundated areas. Nat. Commun. 15, 10894 (2024).
Koffi, E. N., Bergamaschi, P., Alkama, R. & Cescatti, A. An observation-constrained assessment of the climate sensitivity and future trajectories of wetland methane emissions. Sci. Adv. 6, eaay4444 (2020).
Descals, A. et al. Unprecedented fire activity above the Arctic Circle linked to rising temperatures. Science 378, 532–537 (2022).
Zheng, B. et al. Record-high CO2 emissions from boreal fires in 2021. Science 379, 912–917 (2023).
Shen, L. et al. National quantifications of methane emissions from fuel exploitation using high resolution inversions of satellite observations. Nat. Commun. 14, 4948 (2023).
van Marle, M. J. E. et al. Historic global biomass burning emissions for CMIP6 (BB4CMIP) based on merging satellite observations with proxies and fire models (1750–2015). Geosci. Model Dev. 10, 3329–3357 (2017).
Segers, A., Steinke, T. & Houweling, S. Description of the CH4 Inversion Production Chain, CAMS (Copernicus Atmospheric Monitoring Service) Report (2022); https://atmosphere.copernicus.eu/sites/default/files/2022-10/CAMS255_2021SC1_D55.5.2.1-2021CH4_202206_production_chain_CH4_v1.pdf.
Xi, Y., Peng, S., Ciais, P. & Chen, Y. Future impacts of climate change on inland Ramsar wetlands. Nat. Clim. Change 11, 45–51 (2021).
Xi, Y. et al. Gridded maps of wetlands dynamics over mid-low latitudes for 1980–2020 based on TOPMODEL. Sci. Data 9, 347 (2022).
Bernard, J. et al. Assessing the time variability of GIEMS-2 satellite-derived surface water extent over 30 years. Front. Remote Sens. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsen.2024.1399234 (2024).
Zhang, X. et al. Global annual wetland dataset at 30 m with a fine classification system from 2000 to 2022. Sci. Data 11, 310 (2024).
Collins, W. J. et al. AerChemMIP: quantifying the effects of chemistry and aerosols in CMIP6. Geosci. Model Dev. 10, 585–607 (2017).
Zhao, Y. et al. On the role of trend and variability in the hydroxyl radical (OH) in the global methane budget. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 20, 13011–13022 (2020).
Stevenson, D. S. et al. Trends in global tropospheric hydroxyl radical and methane lifetime since 1850 from AerChemMIP. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 20, 12905–12920 (2020).
IPCC Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis (eds Masson-Delmotte, V. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2021).
Wang, Y. & Jacob, D. J. Anthropogenic forcing on tropospheric ozone and OH since preindustrial times. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 103, 31123–31135 (1998).
McDuffie, E. E. et al. A global anthropogenic emission inventory of atmospheric pollutants from sector- and fuel-specific sources (1970–2017): an application of the Community Emissions Data System (CEDS). Earth Syst. Sci. Data 12, 3413–3442 (2020).
Claxton, T. et al. A synthesis inversion to constrain global emissions of two very short lived chlorocarbons: dichloromethane, and perchloroethylene. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 125, e2019JD031818 (2020).
East, J. D. et al. Interpreting the seasonality of atmospheric methane. Geophys. Res. Lett. 51, e2024GL108494 (2024).
Vautard, R., Yiou, P. & Ghil, M. Singular-spectrum analysis: a toolkit for short, noisy chaotic signals. Physica D 58, 95–126 (1992).
Dlugokencky, E. J., Steele, L. P., Lang, P. M. & Masarie, K. A. The growth rate and distribution of atmospheric methane. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 99, 17021–17043 (1994).
Stekhoven, D. J. & Bühlmann, P. MissForest—non-parametric missing value imputation for mixed-type data. Bioinformatics 28, 112–118 (2012).
Crippa, M. et al. GHG Emissions of All World Countries: 2021 Report (Publications Office of the European Union, 2021); https://doi.org/10.2760/173513.
O’Rourke, P. et al. CEDS v_2021_02_05 release emission data. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4509372 (2021).
Guimberteau, M. et al. ORCHIDEE-MICT (v8.4.1), a land surface model for the high latitudes: model description and validation. Geosci. Model Dev. 11, 121–163 (2018).
van der Werf, G. R. et al. Global fire emissions estimates during 1997–2016. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 9, 697–720 (2017).
Hauglustaine, D. A. et al. Interactive chemistry in the Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique general circulation model: description and background tropospheric chemistry evaluation. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 109, D04314 (2004).
Hauglustaine, D. A., Balkanski, Y. & Schulz, M. A global model simulation of present and future nitrate aerosols and their direct radiative forcing of climate. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 14, 11031–11063 (2014).
Shen, L. et al. A machine-learning-guided adaptive algorithm to reduce the computational cost of integrating kinetics in global atmospheric chemistry models: application to GEOS-Chem versions 12.0.0 and 12.9.1. Geosci. Model Dev. 15, 1677–1687 (2022).
China Statistical Yearbook 2021 (China Statistics Press, 2021).
Global Modeling and Assimilation Office (GMAO). MERRA-2 tavg1_2 d_flx_Nx: 2d,1-hourly, time-averaged, single-level, assimilation, surface flux diagnostics V5.12.4. GSFC DAAC https://doi.org/10.5067/7MCPBJ41Y0K6 (2021).
Beck, H. E. et al. MSWEP: 3-hourly 0.25° global gridded precipitation (1979–2015) by merging gauge, satellite, and reanalysis data. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 21, 589–615 (2017).
Beck, H. E. et al. MSWEP V2 global 3-hourly 0.1° precipitation: methodology and quantitative assessment. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 100, 473–500 (2019).
Zhang, Z., Zimmermann, N. E., Kaplan, J. O. & Poulter, B. Modeling spatiotemporal dynamics of global wetlands: comprehensive evaluation of a new sub-grid TOPMODEL parameterization and uncertainties. Biogeosciences 13, 1387–1408 (2016).
Colligan, T., Poulter, B. & Colin, Q. LPJ-EOSIM L2 global simulated monthly wetland methane flux V001, distributed by NASA EOSDIS Land Processes Distributed Active Archive Center. Earth Data https://doi.org/10.5067/Community/LPJ-EOSIM/LPJ_EOSIM_L2_MCH4E.001 (2024).
Messina, P. et al. Global biogenic volatile organic compound emissions in the ORCHIDEE and MEGAN models and sensitivity to key parameters. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 16, 14169–14202 (2016).
