Thursday, September 25, 2025
No menu items!
HomeNatureThe geoeconomic turn in decarbonization

The geoeconomic turn in decarbonization

  • Scholten, D., Bazilian, M., Overland, I. & Westphal, K. The geopolitics of renewables: new board, new game. Energy Policy 138, 111059 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Blondeel, M., Bradshaw, M. J., Bridge, G. & Kuzemko, C. The geopolitics of energy system transformation: a review. Geogr. Compass 15, e12580 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Binz, C., Tang, T. & Huenteler, J. Spatial lifecycles of cleantech industries—the global development history of solar photovoltaics. Energy Policy 101, 386–402 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lewis, J. I. Green industrial policy after Paris: renewable energy policy measures and climate goals. Glob. Environ. Polit. 21, 42–63 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Nahm, J. Trailing—or Governing—the Market? Two Decades of Industrial Policy for China’s Solar Sector. Working Paper No. 1 (UC Institute on Global Conflict and Cooperation, 2023); https://ucigcc.org/publication/trailing-or-governing-the-market-two-decades-of-industrial-policy-for-chinas-solar-sector/.

  • Meckling, J. & Nahm, J. When do states disrupt industries? Electric cars in Germany and the United States. Rev. Int. Polit. Econ. 25, 505–529 (2018).

  • Meckling, J., Galeazzi, C., Shears, E., Xu, T. & Anadon, L. D. Energy innovation funding and institutions in major economies. Nat. Energy 7, 876–885 (2022).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Carley, S. Energy programs of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. Rev. Policy Res. 33, 201–223 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • MacNeil, R. Between innovation and industrial policy: how Washington succeeds and fails at renewable energy. Prometheus 34, 173–189 (2017).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Lewis, J. I. The rise of renewable energy protectionism: emerging trade conflicts and implications for low carbon development. Glob. Environ. Polit. 14, 10–35 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • IPCC Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change (eds Shukla, P. R. et al.) (Cambridge, Univ. Press, 2022).

  • Way, R., Ives, M. C., Mealy, P. & Farmer, J. D. Empirically grounded technology forecasts and the energy transition. Joule 6, 2057–2082 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • World Energy Outlook 2024 (IEA, 2024).

  • Nemet, G. How Solar Energy Became Cheap: A Model for Low-Carbon Innovation (Routledge, 2019).

  • McNerney, J., Farmer, J. D., Redner, S. & Trancik, J. E. Role of design complexity in technology improvement. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 9008–9013 (2011).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Trancik, J. E. Scale and innovation in the energy sector: a focus on photovoltaics and nuclear fission. Environ. Res. Lett. 1, 014009 (2006).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sweerts, B., Detz, R. J. & van der Zwaan, B. Evaluating the role of unit size in learning-by-doing of energy technologies. Joule 4, 967–970 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Nahm, J. & Steinfeld, E. S. Scale-up nation: China’s specialization in innovative manufacturing. World Dev. 54, 288–300 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lewis, J. I. The climate risk of green industrial policy. Curr. Hist. 123, 14–19 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Naughton, B. The Rise of China’s Industrial Policy, 1978 to 2020 (Universidad Nacional Autónomica de México, Facultad de Economía, 2021).

  • Energy Technology Perspectives 2024 (IEA, 2024).

  • Global Critical Minerals Outlook 2024 (IEA, 2024).

  • Green, F. Green New Deals in comparative perspective. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Clim. Change https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.885 (2024).

  • Meckling, J. & Allan, B. B. The evolution of ideas in global climate policy. Nat. Clim. Change 10, 434–438 (2020).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Meckling, J. A new path for U.S. climate politics: choosing policies that mobilize business for decarbonization. Ann. Am. Acad. Pol. Soc. Sci. 685, 82–95 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Helm, D. Net Zero: How We Stop Causing Climate Change (HarperCollins, 2020).

  • Segerson, K. et al. A cautious approach to subsidies for environmental sustainability. Science 386, 28–30 (2024).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zysman, J. & Huberty, M. Can Green Sustain Growth? (Stanford Business Books, 2014).

  • Aiginger, K. & Ketels, C. Industrial policy reloaded. J. Ind. Compet. Trade 24, 7 (2024).

  • Bordoff, J. & O’Sullivan, M. L. The age of energy insecurity: how the fight for resources is upending geopolitics. Foreign Aff. 102, 104 (2023).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Lebdioui, A. Survival of the Greenest: Economic Transformation in a Climate-conscious World Elements in Development Economics (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2024).

  • Surana, K., Doblinger, C., Anadon, L. D. & Hultman, N. Effects of technology complexity on the emergence and evolution of wind industry manufacturing locations along global value chains. Nat. Energy 5, 811–821 (2020).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Steffen, B., Matsuo, T., Steinemann, D. & Schmidt, T. S. Opening new markets for clean energy: the role of project developers in the global diffusion of renewable energy technologies. Bus. Polit. 20, 553–587 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hochstetler, K. Political Economies of Energy Transition: Wind and Solar Power in Brazil and South Africa (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2020).

  • Haraguchi, N., Cheng, C. F. C. & Smeets, E. The importance of manufacturing in economic development: has this changed? World Dev. 93, 293–315 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Harrison, A., Martin, L. A. & Nataraj, S. Green industrial policy in emerging markets. Annu. Rev. Resour. Econ. 9, 253–274 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Collins, M. Energy in the era of competitive decarbonization. Forum Q. J. 143, 12–15 (2025).

  • Ding, J. Technology and the Rise of Great Powers: How Diffusion Shapes Economic Competition (Princeton, Univ. Press, 2024).

  • Matsuo, T. & Schmidt, T. S. Managing tradeoffs in green industrial policies: the role of renewable energy policy design. World Dev. 122, 11–26 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Huberty, M. & Zysman, J. An energy system transformation: framing research choices for the climate challenge. Res. Policy 39, 1027–1029 (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Schmidt, T. S. & Sewerin, S. Measuring the temporal dynamics of policy mixes—an empirical analysis of renewable energy policy mixes’ balance and design features in nine countries. Res. Policy https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.03.012 (2018).

  • Grubb, M. et al. Induced innovation in energy technologies and systems: a review of evidence and potential implications for CO2 mitigation. Environ. Res. Lett. 16, 043007 (2021).

  • Stechemesser, A. et al. Climate policies that achieved major emission reductions: global evidence from two decades. Science 385, 884–892 (2024).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rogge, K. S. & Reichardt, K. Policy mixes for sustainability transitions: an extended concept and framework for analysis. Res. Policy 45, 1620–1635 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Malhotra, A. & Schmidt, T. S. Accelerating low-carbon innovation. Joule 4, 2259–2267 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Criscuolo, C. & Lalanne, G. A new approach for better industrial strategies. J. Ind. Compet. Trade 24, 6 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pegels, A. & Altenburg, T. Latecomer development in a “greening” world: introduction to the special issue. World Dev. 135, 105084 (2020).

  • Pless, J. Are Complementary Policies Substitutes? Evidence from R&D subsidies in the UK. Working Paper (MIT, 2023).

  • Rodrik, D. Green industrial policy. Oxf. Rev. Econ. Policy 30, 469–491 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Vogt-Schilb, A., Meunier, G. & Hallegatte, S. When starting with the most expensive option makes sense: optimal timing, cost and sectoral allocation of abatement investment. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 88, 210–233 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Acemoglu, D., Aghion, P., Bursztyn, L. & Hemous, D. The environment and directed technical change. Am. Econ. Rev. 102, 131–166 (2012).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Meckling, J. & Biber, E. A policy roadmap for negative emissions using direct air capture. Nat. Commun. 12, 2051 (2021).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Noll, B., Steffen, B. & Schmidt, T. S. Domestic-first, climate second? Global consequences of the Inflation Reduction Act. Joule 8, 1869–1873 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kuznetsov, Y. & Sabel, C. F. in Making Innovation Policy Work: Learning from Experimentation (eds Dutz, M. A., Kuznetsov, Y., Lasagabaster, E. & Pilat, D.) 35–48 (OECD and World Bank, 2014).

  • Allan, B. B. & Nahm, J. Strategies of green industrial policy: how states position firms in global supply chains. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055424000364 (2024).

  • Amsden, A. H. Asia’s Next Giant: South Korea and Late Industrialization (Oxford Univ. Press, 1989).

  • Mazzucato, M. & Rodrik, D. Industrial Policy with Conditionalities: A Taxonomy and Sample Cases (UCL Institute for Innovation and Public Purpose, 2023).

  • Meckling, J. & Strecker, J. Green bargains: leveraging public investment to advance climate regulation. Clim. Policy https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2022.2149452 (2022).

  • Bulfone, F., Ergen, T. & Kalaitzake, M. No strings attached: corporate welfare, state intervention, and the issue of conditionality. Compet. Change 27, 253–276 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Schmitz, L., Seidl, T. & Wuttke, T. The costs of conditionality. IPCEIs and the constrained politics of EU industrial policy. Compet. Change https://doi.org/10.1177/10245294251320675 (2025).

  • Gaikwad, N., Genovese, F. & Tingley, D. Creating climate coalitions: mass preferences for compensating vulnerability in the world’s two largest democracies. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055422000223 (2022).

  • Meckling, J. & Nahm, J. Strategic state capacity: how states counter opposition to climate policy. Comp. Polit. Stud. 55, 493–523 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Finnegan, J. J., Lipscy, P. Y., Meckling, J. & Metz, F. The institutional sources of economic transformation: explaining variation in energy transitions. J. Politics https://doi.org/10.1086/735439 (2025).

  • Beckfield, J. & Evrard, D. A. The social impacts of supply-side decarbonization. Annu. Rev. Sociol 49, 155–175 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Juhász, R. & Lane, N. The political economy of industrial policy. J. Econ. Perspect. 38, 27–54 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Meckling, J. & Benkler, A. State capacity and varieties of climate policy. Nat. Commun. 15, 9942 (2024).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Allan, B., Lewis, J. I. & Oatley, T. Green industrial policy and the global transformation of climate politics. Glob. Environ. Polit. 21, 1–19 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Thurbon, E., Kim, S.-Y., Tan, H. & Mathews, J. A. Developmental Environmentalism: State Ambition and Creative Destruction in East Asia’s Green Energy Transition (Oxford Univ. Press, 2023).

  • McNamara, K. R. Transforming Europe? The EU’s industrial policy and geopolitical turn. J. Eur. Public Policy https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2023.2230247 (2023).

  • Allan, B. B. Industrial policy and the green state: forging a world after growth. Rev. Int. Stud. 50, 888–897 (2024).

  • Wei, Y., Ang, Y. Y. & Jia, N. The promise and pitfalls of government guidance funds in China. China Q. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741023000280 (2023).

  • Geddes, A., Schmidt, T. S. & Steffen, B. The multiple roles of state investment banks in low-carbon energy finance: an analysis of Australia, the UK and Germany. Energy Policy 115, 158–170 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Storper, M., Nicholas Ziegler, J., Botelho, A. J. J. & Ornston, D. On Mariana Mazzucato’s Mission Economy: a Moonshot Guide to Changing Capitalism, London, Allen Lane, 2021. Socioecon. Rev. 20, 1501–1511 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Victor, D. G. & Carlton, E. K. Technology to solve global problems: an emerging consensus for green industrial policy? Environ. Res. Lett. 18, 091006 (2023).

  • Evans, P. Embedded Autonomy. States and Industrial Transformation (Princeton Univ. Press, 1995).

  • Schmitz, H., Johnson, O. & Altenburg, T. Rent management—the heart of green industrial policy. New Polit. Econ. 20, 812–831 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Markard, J. & Hoffmann, V. H. Analysis of complementarities: framework and examples from the energy transition. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 111, 63–75 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dugoua, E. & Dumas, M. Coordination dynamics between fuel cell and battery technologies in the transition to clean cars. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 121, e2318605121 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Anadón, L. D. Missions-oriented RD&D institutions in energy between 2000 and 2010: a comparative analysis of China, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Res. Policy 41, 1742–1756 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Block, F. Swimming against the current: the rise of a hidden developmental state in the United States. Polit. Soc. 36, 169–206 (2008).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Mealy, P. & Teytelboym, A. Economic complexity and the green economy. Res. Policy 51, 103948 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kupzok, N. & Nahm, J. The decarbonization bargain: how the decarbonizable sector shapes climate politics. Perspect. Polit. 22, 1203–1223 (2024).

  • Driscoll, D. Comparative green advantage: growth regimes and public investment in renewable energy R&D. JCMS J. Common Mark. Stud. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13485 (2023).

  • Christophers, B. The Price Is Wrong: Why Capitalism Won’t Save the Planet (Verso Books, 2024).

  • Jaffe, A. M. et al. Green innovation of state-owned oil and gas enterprises in BRICS countries: a review of performance. Clim. Policy 23, 1167–1181 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kelsey, N. Industry type and environmental policy: industry characteristics shape the potential for policymaking success in energy and the environment. Bus. Polit. 20, 615–642 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Turnheim, B. & Sovacool, B. K. Forever stuck in old ways? Pluralising incumbencies in sustainability transitions. Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit. 35, 180–184 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sovacool, B. K., Turnheim, B., Martiskainen, M., Brown, D. & Kivimaa, P. Guides or gatekeepers? Incumbent-oriented transition intermediaries in a low-carbon era. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 66, 101490 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Puente, I. & Schneider, B. R. Business and development: how organization, ownership and networks matter. Rev. Int. Polit. Econ. 27, 1354–1377 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Meckling, J. & Hughes, L. Global interdependence in clean energy transitions. Bus. Polit. 20, 467–491 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Meckling, J. Making industrial policy work for decarbonization. Glob. Environ. Polit. 21, 134–147 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hansen, S. T. & Moe, E. Renewable energy expansion or the preservation of national energy sovereignty? Norwegian renewable energy policy meets resource nationalism. Polit. Geogr. 99, 102760 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Mehling, M. A. Good Spillover, Bad Spillover? Industrial Policy, Trade, and the Political Economy of Decarbonization. Harvard Project on Climate Agreements. Discussion Paper ES 2024-12 (2024).

  • Campbell, K. M. & Sullivan, J. Competition without catastrophe. Foreign Affairs 98, 96–110 (2019).

  • Babić, M. & Mertens, D. Decarbonization under geoeconomic distress? Energy shocks, carbon lock‐ins, and Germany’s pathway toward net zero. Regul. Gov. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12634 (2024).

  • Milner, H. V. & Solstad, S. U. Technological change and the international system. World Polit. 73, 545–589 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rodrik, D. Don’t fret about green subsidies. Project Syndicate https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/green-subsidies-justified-on-economic-environmental-and-moral-grounds-by-dani-rodrik-2024-05 (2024).

  • Hale, T. & Urpelainen, J. When and how can unilateral policies promote the international diffusion of environmental policies and clean technology? J. Theor. Polit. 27, 177–205 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Falkner, R. The Paris Agreement and the new logic of international climate politics. Int. Aff. 92, 1107–1125 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Driesen, D. M., Mehling, M. A. & Popp, D. Industrial policy, populism and the political economy of climate action. Nat. Clim. Change 14, 414–416 (2024).

  • Aisbett, E., Raynal, W., Steinhauser, R. & Jones, B. International green economy collaborations: chasing mutual gains in the energy transition. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 104, 103249 (2023).

  • Oberthür, S., Hermwille, L. & Rayner, T. A sectoral perspective on global climate governance: analytical foundation. Earth Syst. Gov. 8, 100104 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Victor, D. G., Geels, F. W. & Sharpe, S. Accelerating the Low Carbon Transition: The Case for Stronger, More Targeted and Coordinated International Action (Brookings Institution, Washington DC, 2019).

  • Hoekman, B. M. & Nelson, D. Industrial policy and international cooperation. World Trade Review 24, 136–152 (2025).

  • Aiginger, K. & Rodrik, D. Rebirth of industrial policy and an agenda for the twenty-first century. J. Ind. Compet. Trade 20, 189–207 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Helveston, J. P., He, G. & Davidson, M. R. Quantifying the cost savings of global solar photovoltaic supply chains. Nature 612, 83–87 (2022).

  • Pancotti, E. & Tucker, T. Tariffs are a necessary backstop of the clean energy transition. J. Policy Anal. Manage. 44, 323–328 (2024).

  • Davidson, M., Karplus, V., Lewis, J. I., Nahm, J. & Wang, A. Risks of decoupling from China on low-carbon technologies. Science 377, 1266–1269 (2022).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hughes, L. & Meckling, J. The politics of renewable energy trade: the US–China solar dispute. Energy Policy 105, 256–262 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hanson, G. H. & Slaughter, M. J. How commerce can save the climate: the case for a green free trade agreement. Foreign Aff. 102, 119 (2023).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Wu, M. & Salzman, J. The next generation of trade and environment disputes: the rise of green industrial policy. Northwest. Univ. Law Rev. 108, 401–474 (2014).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Bradlow, B. H. & Kentikelenis, A. Globalizing green industrial policy through technology transfers. Nat. Sustain. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-024-01336-4 (2024).

  • Quitzow, R. et al. The COVID-19 crisis deepens the gulf between leaders and laggards in the global energy transition. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 74, 101981 (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bandara, P., Ray, R., Lu, J. & Gallagher, K. P. Developing countries locked out of low-carbon technology trade. Science 388, 248–250 (2025).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • BP Energy Outlook 2024 (BP, 2024); https://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/business-sites/en/global/corporate/pdfs/energy-economics/energy-outlook/bp-energy-outlook-2024.pdf.

  • Deese, B. The case for a clean energy Marshall Plan: how the fight against climate change can renew American leadership. Foreign Aff. 103, 106 (2024).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Colgan, J. D. & Miller, N. L. The rewards of rivalry: US–Chinese competition can spur climate progress. Foreign Aff. 101, 108 (2022).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Nedopil, C. China Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) Investment Report 2023 (Griffith Asia Institute, 2024).

  • Nahm, J. Collaborative Advantage: Forging Green Industries in the New Global Economy (Oxford Univ. Press, 2021).

  • Simpson, N. P., Jacobs, M. & Gilmour, A. Taking Stock of Just Energy Transition Partnerships. ODI Policy Brief (ODI Global, 2023).

  • Mehling, M. In the Vortex of Great Power Competition: Climate, Trade, and Geostrategic Rivalry in U.S.–China–EU Relations (Harvard Project on Climate Agreements, 2025).

  • Goldthau, A. & Westphal, K. How the energy transition will reshape geopolitics. Nature 569, 29–31 (2019).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Moore, S. Climate Action in the Age of Great Power Rivalry: What Geopolitics Means for the Climate (Kleinman Center for Energy Policy, 2024).

  • Pegels, A. & Lütkenhorst, W. Is Germany’s energy transition a case of successful green industrial policy? Contrasting wind and solar PV. Energy Policy 74, 522–534 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pegels, A. Green Industrial Policy in Emerging Countries (Routledge, 2014).

  • Campbell, K. M. & Doshi, R. Underestimating China: why America needs a new strategy of allied scale to offset Beijing’s enduring advantages. Foreign Aff. 104, 66–81 (2025).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Meckling, J., Kelsey, N., Biber, E. & Zysman, J. Winning coalitions for climate policy: green industrial policy builds support for carbon regulation. Science 249, 1170–1171 (2015).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Meckling, J., Sterner, T. & Wagner, G. Policy sequencing toward decarbonization. Nat. Energy 2, 918–922 (2017).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Linsenmeier, M., Mohommad, A. & Schwerhoff, G. Policy sequencing towards carbon pricing among the world’s largest emitters. Nat. Clim. Change 12, 1107–1110 (2022).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Keohane, R. O. & Victor, D. G. Cooperation and discord in global climate policy. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 570–575 (2016).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Evenett, S. et al. Industrial Policy Since the Great Financial Crisis. Working Paper (International Monetary Fund, 2025).

  • Juhász, R., Lane, N., Oehlsen, E. & Pérez, V. C. The Who, What, When, and How of Industrial Policy: A Text-Based Approach Working Paper (NBER, 2023).

  • Renewables 2007: Global Status Report (REN21, 2007).

  • A Climate for Recovery: The Colour of Stimulus Goes Green (HSBC, 2009).

  • Nahm, J. M., Miller, S. M. & Urpelainen, J. G20’s US $14-trillion economic stimulus reneges on emissions pledges. Nature 603, 28–31 (2022).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • RELATED ARTICLES

    Most Popular

    Recent Comments