Thursday, March 5, 2026
No menu items!
HomeNatureStructural basis of RNA-guided transcription by a dCas12f–σE–RNAP complex

Structural basis of RNA-guided transcription by a dCas12f–σE–RNAP complex

  • Wiegand, T. et al. TnpB homologues exapted from transposons are RNA-guided transcription factors. Nature 631, 439–448 (2024).

    Article 
    ADS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Qi, L. S. et al. Repurposing CRISPR as an RNA-guided platform for sequence-specific control of gene expression. Cell 152, 1173–1183 (2013).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bikard, D. et al. Programmable repression and activation of bacterial gene expression using an engineered CRISPR-Cas system. Nucl. Acids Res. 41, 7429–7437 (2013).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Workman, R. E. et al. A natural single-guide RNA repurposes Cas9 to autoregulate CRISPR-Cas expression. Cell 184, 675–688.e619 (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wu, W. Y. et al. The miniature CRISPR-Cas12m effector binds DNA to block transcription. Mol. Cell 82, 4487–4502.e4487 (2022).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hoffmann, F. T. et al. Exapted CRISPR–Cas12f homologues drive RNA-guided transcription. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-026-10166-7 (2026).

  • deHaseth, P. L., Lohman, T. M., Burgess, R. R. & Record, M. T. Jr. Nonspecific interactions of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase with native and denatured DNA: differences in the binding behavior of core and holoenzyme. Biochemistry 17, 1612–1622 (1978).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lee, D. J., Minchin, S. D. & Busby, S. J. Activating transcription in bacteria. Ann. Rev. Microbiol. 66, 125–152 (2012).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Feklistov, A., Sharon, B. D., Darst, S. A. & Gross, C. A. Bacterial sigma factors: a historical, structural, and genomic perspective. Ann. Rev. Microbiol. 68, 357–376 (2014).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Paget, M. S. & Helmann, J. D. The sigma70 family of sigma factors. Genome Biol. 4, 203 (2003).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Campbell, E. A. et al. Crystal structure of Escherichia coli sigmaE with the cytoplasmic domain of its anti-sigma RseA. Mol. Cell. 11, 1067–1078 (2003).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhang, Y. et al. Structural basis of transcription initiation. Science 338, 1076–1080 (2012).

    Article 
    ADS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Casas-Pastor, D. et al. Expansion and re-classification of the extracytoplasmic function (ECF) sigma factor family. Nucl. Acids Res. 49, 986–1005 (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Mascher, T. Past, present, and future of extracytoplasmic function sigma factors: distribution and regulatory diversity of the third pillar of bacterial signal transduction. Ann. Rev. Microbiol. 77, 625–644 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Altae-Tran, H. et al. Diversity, evolution, and classification of the RNA-guided nucleases TnpB and Cas12. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 120, e2308224120 (2023).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sampson, T. R., Saroj, S. D., Llewellyn, A. C., Tzeng, Y. L. & Weiss, D. S. A CRISPR/Cas system mediates bacterial innate immune evasion and virulence. Nature 497, 254–257 (2013).

    Article 
    ADS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Huang, C. J., Adler, B. A. & Doudna, J. A. A naturally DNase-free CRISPR-Cas12c enzyme silences gene expression. Mol. Cell 82, 2148–2160.e2144 (2022).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gilbert, L. A. et al. Genome-scale CRISPR-mediated control of gene repression and activation. Cell 159, 647–661 (2014).

    Article 
    ADS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Takeda, S. N. et al. Structure of the miniature type V-F CRISPR-Cas effector enzyme. Mol. Cell 81, 558–570 e553 (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Xiao, R., Li, Z., Wang, S., Han, R. & Chang, L. Structural basis for substrate recognition and cleavage by the dimerization-dependent CRISPR-Cas12f nuclease. Nucl. Acids Res. 49, 4120–4128 (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hino, T. et al. An AsCas12f-based compact genome-editing tool derived by deep mutational scanning and structural analysis. Cell 186, 4920–4935.e4923 (2023).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wu, T. et al. An engineered hypercompact CRISPR-Cas12f system with boosted gene-editing activity. Nat. Chem. Biol. 19, 1384–1393 (2023).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Harrington, L. B. et al. Programmed DNA destruction by miniature CRISPR-Cas14 enzymes. Science 362, 839–842 (2018).

    Article 
    ADS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Yang, H., Gao, P., Rajashankar, K. R. & Patel, D. J. PAM-dependent target dna recognition and cleavage by C2c1 CRISPR-Cas endonuclease. Cell 167, 1814–1828 (2016).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhang, H., Li, Z., Xiao, R. & Chang, L. Mechanisms for target recognition and cleavage by the Cas12i RNA-guided endonuclease. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 27, 1069–1076 (2020).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sternberg, S. H., Redding, S., Jinek, M., Greene, E. C. & Doudna, J. A. DNA interrogation by the CRISPR RNA-guided endonuclease Cas9. Nature 507, 62–67 (2014).

    Article 
    ADS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Liu, B., Hong, C., Huang, R. K., Yu, Z. & Steitz, T. A. Structural basis of bacterial transcription activation. Science 358, 947–951 (2017).

    Article 
    ADS 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chen, J. et al. E. coli TraR allosterically regulates transcription initiation by altering RNA polymerase conformation. eLife https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.49375 (2019).

  • Fang, C. et al. Structures and mechanism of transcription initiation by bacterial ECF factors. Nucl. Acids Res. 47, 7094–7104 (2019).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lin, W. et al. Structural basis of ECF-sigma-factor-dependent transcription initiation. Nat. Commun. 10, 710 (2019).

    Article 
    ADS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Li, L., Fang, C., Zhuang, N., Wang, T. & Zhang, Y. Structural basis for transcription initiation by bacterial ECF sigma factors. Nat. Commun. 10, 1153 (2019).

    Article 
    ADS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bae, B., Feklistov, A., Lass-Napiorkowska, A., Landick, R. & Darst, S. A. Structure of a bacterial RNA polymerase holoenzyme open promoter complex. eLife https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.08504 (2015).

  • Lin, W. et al. Structural basis of mycobacterium tuberculosis transcription and transcription inhibition. Mol. Cell 66, 169–179.e168 (2017).

    Article 
    ADS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Marin-Gonzalez, A., Vilhena, J. G., Perez, R. & Moreno-Herrero, F. A molecular view of DNA flexibility. Q. Rev. Biophys. 54, e8 (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Nudler, E. RNA polymerase active center: the molecular engine of transcription. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 78, 335–361 (2009).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Geszvain, K., Gruber, T. M., Mooney, R. A., Gross, C. A. & Landick, R. A hydrophobic patch on the flap-tip helix of E.coli RNA polymerase mediates sigma(70) region 4 function. J. Mol. Biol. 343, 569–587 (2004).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Minakhin, L. et al. Bacterial RNA polymerase subunit omega and eukaryotic RNA polymerase subunit RPB6 are sequence, structural, and functional homologs and promote RNA polymerase assembly. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 892–897 (2001).

    Article 
    ADS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ghosh, P., Ishihama, A. & Chatterji, D. Escherichia coli RNA polymerase subunit ω and its N-terminal domain bind full-length β′ to facilitate incorporation into the α2β subassembly. Eur. J. Biochem. 268, 4621–4627 (2001).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bu, F. et al. Cryo-EM structure of Porphyromonas gingivalis RNA polymerase. J. Mol. Biol. 436, 168568 (2024).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lane, W. J. & Darst, S. A. The structural basis for promoter −35 element recognition by the group IV sigma factors. PLoS Biol. 4, e269 (2006).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Li, J. et al. Structure of the transcription open complex of distinct sigma(I) factors. Nat. Commun. 14, 6455 (2023).

    Article 
    ADS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rohs, R. et al. The role of DNA shape in protein–DNA recognition. Nature 461, 1248–1253 (2009).

    Article 
    ADS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Feklistov, A. & Darst, S. A. Structural basis for promoter-10 element recognition by the bacterial RNA polymerase sigma subunit. Cell 147, 1257–1269 (2011).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lim, H. M., Lee, H. J., Roy, S. & Adhya, S. A “master” in base unpairing during isomerization of a promoter upon RNA polymerase binding. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 14849–14852 (2001).

    Article 
    ADS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bayley, D. P., Rocha, E. R. & Smith, C. J. Analysis of cepA and other Bacteroides fragilis genes reveals a unique promoter structure. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 193, 149–154 (2000).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chen, S., Bagdasarian, M., Kaufman, M. G. & Walker, E. D. Characterization of strong promoters from an environmental Flavobacterium hibernum strain by using a green fluorescent protein-based reporter system. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73, 1089–1100 (2007).

    Article 
    ADS 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Feng, Y., Zhang, Y. & Ebright, R. H. Structural basis of transcription activation. Science 352, 1330–1333 (2016).

    Article 
    ADS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Murakami, K. S., Masuda, S. & Darst, S. A. Structural basis of transcription initiation: RNA polymerase holoenzyme at 4 Å resolution. Science 296, 1280–1284 (2002).

    Article 
    ADS 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zuo, Y. & Steitz, T. A. Crystal structures of the E. coli transcription initiation complexes with a complete bubble. Mol. Cell 58, 534–540 (2015).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Murakami, K. S., Masuda, S., Campbell, E. A., Muzzin, O. & Darst, S. A. Structural basis of transcription initiation: an RNA polymerase holoenzyme-DNA complex. Science 296, 1285–1290 (2002).

    Article 
    ADS 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hubbard, B. P. et al. Continuous directed evolution of DNA-binding proteins to improve TALEN specificity. Nat. Methods 12, 939–942 (2015).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Feklistov, A. RNA polymerase: in search of promoters. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1293, 25–32 (2013).

    Article 
    ADS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Velappan, N., Sblattero, D., Chasteen, L., Pavlik, P. & Bradbury, A. R. M. Plasmid incompatibility: more compatible than previously thought. Protein Eng. Des. Sel. 20, 309–313 (2007).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Punjani, A., Rubinstein, J. L., Fleet, D. J. & Brubaker, M. A. cryoSPARC: algorithms for rapid unsupervised cryo-EM structure determination. Nat. Methods 14, 290–296 (2017).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bepler, T. et al. Positive-unlabeled convolutional neural networks for particle picking in cryo-electron micrographs. Nat. Methods 16, 1153–1160 (2019).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Tan, Y. Z. et al. Addressing preferred specimen orientation in single-particle cryo-EM through tilting. Nat. Methods 14, 793–796 (2017).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sanchez-Garcia, R. et al. DeepEMhancer: a deep learning solution for cryo-EM volume post-processing. Commun. Biol. 4, 874 (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pettersen, E. F. et al. UCSF Chimera–a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 25, 1605–1612 (2004).

    Article 
    ADS 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Abramson, J. et al. Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with AlphaFold 3. Nature 630, 493–500 (2024).

    Article 
    ADS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Emsley, P., Lohkamp, B., Scott, W. G. & Cowtan, K. Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 486–501 (2010).

    Article 
    ADS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Afonine, P. V. et al. Real-space refinement in PHENIX for cryo-EM and crystallography. Acta Crystallogr. D 74, 531–544 (2018).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • McWilliam, H. et al. Analysis Tool Web Services from the EMBL-EBI. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, W597–600 (2013).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Robert, X. & Gouet, P. Deciphering key features in protein structures with the new ENDscript server. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, W320–324 (2014).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kerpedjiev, P., Hammer, S. & Hofacker, I. L. Forna (force-directed RNA): simple and effective online RNA secondary structure diagrams. Bioinformatics 31, 3377–3379 (2015).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pettersen, E. F. et al. UCSF ChimeraX: structure visualization for researchers, educators, and developers. Protein Sci. 30, 70–82 (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Grantz, J. M. et al. The platelet and plasma proteome and targeted lipidome in postpartum dairy cows with elevated systemic inflammation. Sci. Rep. 14, 31240 (2024).

    Article 
    ADS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lee, Y. et al. Proteomics-based models of gene expression and cellular control of cotton fiber development. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.02.05.636703 (2025).

  • Demichev, V., Messner, C. B., Vernardis, S. I., Lilley, K. S. & Ralser, M. DIA-NN: neural networks and interference correction enable deep proteome coverage in high throughput. Nat. Methods 17, 41–44 (2020).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • UniProt, C. UniProt: the Universal Protein Knowledgebase in 2025. Nucleic Acids Res. 53, D609–D617 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Katoh, K., Kuma, K., Toh, H. & Miyata, T. MAFFT version 5: improvement in accuracy of multiple sequence alignment. Nucl. Acids Res. 33, 511–518 (2005).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Camacho, C. et al. BLAST+: architecture and applications. BMC Bioinf. 10, 421 (2009).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chamberlain, S. A. & Szocs, E. Taxize: taxonomic search and retrieval in R. F1000Res 2, 191 (2013).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Schoch, C. L. et al. NCBI Taxonomy: a comprehensive update on curation, resources and tools. Database https://doi.org/10.1093/database/baaa062 (2020).

  • Xu, S. et al. Ggtree: a serialized data object for visualization of a phylogenetic tree and annotation data. Imeta 1, e56 (2022).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • RELATED ARTICLES

    Most Popular

    Recent Comments