Henikoff, S., Ahmad, K. & Malik, H. S. The centromere paradox: stable inheritance with rapidly evolving DNA. Science 293, 1098–1102 (2001).
Altemose, N. et al. Complete genomic and epigenetic maps of human centromeres. Science 376, eabl4178 (2022).
Logsdon, G. A. et al. The variation and evolution of complete human centromeres. Nature 629, 136–145 (2024).
Strauss, F. & Varshavsky, A. A protein binds to a satellite DNA repeat at three specific sites that would be brought into mutual proximity by DNA folding in the nucleosome. Cell 37, 889–901 (1984).
Vogel, B., Loschberger, A., Sauer, M. & Hock, R. Cross-linking of DNA through HMGA1 suggests a DNA scaffold. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, 7124–7133 (2011).
Kixmoeller, K., Allu, P. K. & Black, B. E. The centromere comes into focus: from CENP-A nucleosomes to kinetochore connections with the spindle. Open Biol. 10, 200051 (2020).
Bernard, P. et al. Requirement of heterochromatin for cohesion at centromeres. Science 294, 2539–2542 (2001).
Folco, H. D., Pidoux, A. L., Urano, T. & Allshire, R. C. Heterochromatin and RNAi are required to establish CENP-A chromatin at centromeres. Science 319, 94–97 (2008).
Olszak, A. M. et al. Heterochromatin boundaries are hotspots for de novo kinetochore formation. Nat. Cell Biol. 13, 799–808 (2011).
Jagannathan, M., Cummings, R. & Yamashita, Y. M. A conserved function for pericentromeric satellite DNA. eLife 7, e34122 (2018).
Nonaka, N. et al. Recruitment of cohesin to heterochromatic regions by Swi6/HP1 in fission yeast. Nat. Cell Biol. 4, 89–93 (2002).
Kawashima, S. A. et al. Shugoshin enables tension-generating attachment of kinetochores by loading Aurora to centromeres. Genes Dev. 21, 420–435 (2007).
Eckert, C. A., Gravdahl, D. J. & Megee, P. C. The enhancement of pericentromeric cohesin association by conserved kinetochore components promotes high-fidelity chromosome segregation and is sensitive to microtubule-based tension. Genes Dev. 21, 278–291 (2007).
Alkan, C. et al. Genome-wide characterization of centromeric satellites from multiple mammalian genomes. Genome Res. 21, 137–145 (2011).
Arora, U. P., Charlebois, C., Lawal, R. A. & Dumont, B. L. Population and subspecies diversity at mouse centromere satellites. BMC Genomics 22, 279 (2021).
Jagannathan, M., Warsinger-Pepe, N., Watase, G. J. & Yamashita, Y. M. Comparative analysis of satellite DNA in the Drosophila melanogaster species complex. G3 7, 693–704 (2017).
Chang, C. H. et al. Islands of retroelements are major components of Drosophila centromeres. PLoS Biol. 17, e3000241 (2019).
Gambogi, C. W. et al. Centromere innovations within a mouse species. Sci. Adv. 9, eadi5764 (2023).
DeBose-Scarlett, E. M. & Sullivan, B. A. Genomic and epigenetic foundations of neocentromere formation. Annu. Rev. Genet. 55, 331–348 (2021).
Guenatri, M., Bailly, D., Maison, C. & Almouzni, G. Mouse centric and pericentric satellite repeats form distinct functional heterochromatin. J. Cell Biol. 166, 493–505 (2004).
Iwata-Otsubo, A. et al. Expanded satellite repeats amplify a discrete CENP-A nucleosome assembly site on chromosomes that drive in female meiosis. Curr. Biol. 27, 2365–2373 (2017).
Wong, A. K., Biddle, F. G. & Rattner, J. B. The chromosomal distribution of the major and minor satellite is not conserved in the genus Mus. Chromosoma 99, 190–195 (1990).
Narayanswami, S. et al. Cytological and molecular characterization of centromeres in Mus domesticus and Mus spretus. Mamm. Genome 2, 186–194 (1992).
Miyanari, Y., Ziegler-Birling, C. & Torres-Padilla, M. E. Live visualization of chromatin dynamics with fluorescent TALEs. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 20, 1321–1324 (2013).
Akera, T., Trimm, E. & Lampson, M. A. Molecular strategies of meiotic cheating by selfish centromeres. Cell 178, 1132–1144 (2019).
El Yakoubi, W. & Akera, T. Condensin dysfunction is a reproductive isolating barrier in mice. Nature 623, 347–355 (2023).
Masumoto, H., Masukata, H., Muro, Y., Nozaki, N. & Okazaki, T. A human centromere antigen (CENP-B) interacts with a short specific sequence in alphoid DNA, a human centromeric satellite. J. Cell Biol. 109, 1963–1973 (1989).
Kixmoeller, K., Tarasovetc, E. V., Mer, E., Chang, Y. W. & Black, B. E. Centromeric chromatin clearings demarcate the site of kinetochore formation. Cell (in the press).
Brandle, F., Fruhbauer, B. & Jagannathan, M. Principles and functions of pericentromeric satellite DNA clustering into chromocenters. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 128, 26–39 (2022).
Matsuda, Y. & Chapman, V. M. In situ analysis of centromeric satellite DNA segregating in Mus species crosses. Mamm. Genome 1, 71–77 (1991).
Larsen, T. A., Goodsell, D. S., Cascio, D., Grzeskowiak, K. & Dickerson, R. E. The structure of DAPI bound to DNA. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 7, 477–491 (1989).
Wilson, W. D. et al. Binding of 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) to GC and mixed sequences in DNA: intercalation of a classical groove-binding molecule. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 111, 5008–5010 (1989).
Wilson, W. D. et al. DNA sequence dependent binding modes of 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI). Biochemistry 29, 8452–8461 (1990).
Hizver, J., Rozenberg, H., Frolow, F., Rabinovich, D. & Shakked, Z. DNA bending by an adenine–thymine tract and its role in gene regulation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 8490–8495 (2001).
Rohs, R. et al. The role of DNA shape in protein–DNA recognition. Nature 461, 1248–1253 (2009).
Joshi, R. et al. Functional specificity of a Hox protein mediated by the recognition of minor groove structure. Cell 131, 530–543 (2007).
Solomon, M. J., Strauss, F. & Varshavsky, A. A mammalian high mobility group protein recognizes any stretch of six A.T base pairs in duplex DNA. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 83, 1276–1280 (1986).
Radic, M. Z., Saghbini, M., Elton, T. S., Reeves, R. & Hamkalo, B. A. Hoechst 33258, distamycin A, and high mobility group protein I (HMG-I) compete for binding to mouse satellite DNA. Chromosoma 101, 602–608 (1992).
Huth, J. R. et al. The solution structure of an HMG-I(Y)–DNA complex defines a new architectural minor groove binding motif. Nat. Struct. Biol. 4, 657–665 (1997).
Colombo, D. F., Burger, L., Baubec, T. & Schubeler, D. Binding of high mobility group A proteins to the mammalian genome occurs as a function of AT-content. PLoS Genet. 13, e1007102 (2017).
Vignali, R. & Marracci, S. HMGA genes and proteins in development and evolution. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21, 654 (2020).
Chiappetta, G. et al. High level expression of the HMGI (Y) gene during embryonic development. Oncogene 13, 2439–2446 (1996).
Clift, D. et al. A method for the acute and rapid degradation of endogenous proteins. Cell 171, 1692–1706 (2017).
Federico, A. et al. Hmga1/Hmga2 double knock-out mice display a “superpygmy” phenotype. Biol. Open 3, 372–378 (2014).
Yoshida, S. et al. Prc1-rich kinetochores are required for error-free acentrosomal spindle bipolarization during meiosis I in mouse oocytes. Nat. Commun. 11, 2652 (2020).
Schuh, M. & Ellenberg, J. Self-organization of MTOCs replaces centrosome function during acentrosomal spindle assembly in live mouse oocytes. Cell 130, 484–498 (2007).
Vallot, A. et al. Tension-induced error correction and not kinetochore attachment status activates the SAC in an Aurora-B/C-dependent manner in oocytes. Curr. Biol. 28, 130–139 (2018).
Chmatal, L., Yang, K., Schultz, R. M. & Lampson, M. A. Spatial regulation of kinetochore microtubule attachments by destabilization at spindle poles in meiosis I. Curr. Biol. 25, 1835–1841 (2015).
Brunet, S. et al. Kinetochore fibers are not involved in the formation of the first meiotic spindle in mouse oocytes, but control the exit from the first meiotic M phase. J. Cell Biol. 146, 1–12 (1999).
Kitajima, T. S., Ohsugi, M. & Ellenberg, J. Complete kinetochore tracking reveals error-prone homologous chromosome biorientation in mammalian oocytes. Cell 146, 568–581 (2011).
Amor, D. J., Kalitsis, P., Sumer, H. & Choo, K. H. Building the centromere: from foundation proteins to 3D organization. Trends Cell Biol. 14, 359–368 (2004).
Vermaak, D. & Malik, H. S. Multiple roles for heterochromatin protein 1 genes in Drosophila. Annu. Rev. Genet. 43, 467–492 (2009).
Risteski, P., Jagric, M., Pavin, N. & Tolic, I. M. Biomechanics of chromosome alignment at the spindle midplane. Curr. Biol. 31, R574–R585 (2021).
Ye, A. A. et al. Aurora A kinase contributes to a pole-based error correction pathway. Curr. Biol. 25, 1842–1851 (2015).
Lampson, M. A. & Grishchuk, E. L. Mechanisms to avoid and correct erroneous kinetochore-microtubule attachments. Biology 6, 1 (2017).
Fry, K. & Salser, W. Nucleotide sequences of HS-α satellite DNA from kangaroo rat Dipodomys ordii and characterization of similar sequences in other rodents. Cell 12, 1069–1084 (1977).
Plohl, M., Mestrovic, N., Bruvo, B. & Ugarkovic, D. Similarity of structural features and evolution of satellite DNAs from Palorus subdepressus (Coleoptera) and related species. J. Mol. Evol. 46, 234–239 (1998).
Plohl, M., Luchetti, A., Mestrovic, N. & Mantovani, B. Satellite DNAs between selfishness and functionality: structure, genomics and evolution of tandem repeats in centromeric (hetero)chromatin. Gene 409, 72–82 (2008).
Melters, D. P. et al. Comparative analysis of tandem repeats from hundreds of species reveals unique insights into centromere evolution. Genome Biol. 14, R10 (2013).
Parker, S. C., Hansen, L., Abaan, H. O., Tullius, T. D. & Margulies, E. H. Local DNA topography correlates with functional noncoding regions of the human genome. Science 324, 389–392 (2009).
Brand, C. L. & Levine, M. T. Functional diversification of chromatin on rapid evolutionary timescales. Annu. Rev. Genet. 55, 401–425 (2021).
Postnikov, Y. V. & Bustin, M. Functional interplay between histone H1 and HMG proteins in chromatin. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1859, 462–467 (2016).
Chardon, F. et al. CENP-B-mediated DNA loops regulate activity and stability of human centromeres. Mol. Cell 82, 1751–1767 (2022).
Jagannathan, M. & Yamashita, Y. M. Defective satellite DNA clustering into chromocenters underlies hybrid incompatibility in Drosophila. Mol. Biol. Evol. 38, 4977–4986 (2021).
Foti, D. et al. Lack of the architectural factor HMGA1 causes insulin resistance and diabetes in humans and mice. Nat. Med. 11, 765–773 (2005).
Mestrovic, N., Plohl, M., Mravinac, B. & Ugarkovic, D. Evolution of satellite DNAs from the genus Palorus–experimental evidence for the “library” hypothesis. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15, 1062–1068 (1998).
Hasson, D. et al. The octamer is the major form of CENP-A nucleosomes at human centromeres. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 20, 687–695 (2013).
Wong, A. K. & Rattner, J. B. Sequence organization and cytological localization of the minor satellite of mouse. Nucleic Acids Res. 16, 11645–11661 (1988).
Horz, W. & Altenburger, W. Nucleotide sequence of mouse satellite DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 9, 683–696 (1981).
Packiaraj, J. & Thakur, J. DNA satellite and chromatin organization at mouse centromeres and pericentromeres. Genome Biol. 25, 52 (2024).
Langmead, B. & Salzberg, S. L. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods 9, 357–359 (2012).
Hon, T. et al. Highly accurate long-read HiFi sequencing data for five complex genomes. Sci. Data 7, 399 (2020).
Schindelin, J. et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 676–682 (2012).
Kumon, T. et al. Parallel pathways for recruiting effector proteins determine centromere drive and suppression. Cell 184, 4904–4918 (2021).
Clift, D., So, C., McEwan, W. A., James, L. C. & Schuh, M. Acute and rapid degradation of endogenous proteins by Trim-Away. Nat. Protoc. 13, 2149–2175 (2018).
Grenfell, A. W. et al. A versatile multivariate image analysis pipeline reveals features of Xenopus extract spindles. J. Cell Biol. 213, 127–136 (2016).
Dudka, D., Akins, R. B. & Lampson, M. A. FREEDA: an automated computational pipeline guides experimental testing of protein innovation. J. Cell Biol. 222, e202212084 (2023).
