March Madness is here, and with it comes the opportunity to audition for a new job in the NBA for the players competing in the 2026 men’s NCAA tournament. It feels like there’s always a few prospects who shoot up the draft board after a strong tournament performance. Kon Knueppel wasn’t always considered a top-5 pick, but his breakout March vaulted him up the draft before he emerged as the NBA’s likely Rookie of the Year. Zach Edey wasn’t really considered a lottery pick until he led Purdue to the 2024 national championship game. Davion Mitchell exploded into a top-10 pick by powering Baylor to the 2021 national championship.
Who will move up the board this year? It could be anyone: 24 of the 30 projected first-round picks in this mock draft are playing in March Madness. The number would be even higher if not for injuries to North Carolina’s Caleb Wilson and Kentucky’s Jayden Quaintance. Only Washington with Hannes Steinbach, Baylor with Cameron Carr, and Stanford with Ebuka Okorie missed the NCAA tournament with a projected first-round pick. Mexican forward Karim Lopez, who is currently playing in the Australian NBL, is the only international prospect projected to be a first-rounder here. Check out my list of the 50 best players in the 2026 men’s NCAA tournament, which features many of the prospects projected in this mock draft.
Here’s our latest 2026 NBA mock draft. We simulated the lottery one time using Tankathon, and got a shocking winner. There’s more analysis on the stakes these players face in March after the table.
Pick |
Team |
Player |
Position |
School |
Age |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dallas Mavericks | Cameron Boozer | Forward | Duke | Freshman |
| 2 | Indiana Pacers | AJ Dybantsa | Wing | BYU | Freshman |
| 3 | Brooklyn Nets | Darryn Peterson | Guard | Kansas | Freshman |
| 4 | Chicago Bulls | Caleb Wilson | Forward | North Carolina | Freshman |
| 5 | Washington Wizards | Keaton Wagler | Guard | Illinois | Freshman |
| 6 | Sacramento Kings | Kingston Flemings | Guard | Houston | Freshman |
| 7 | Utah Jazz | Darius Acuff | Guard | Arkansas | Freshman |
| 8 | Atlanta Hawks | Mikel Brown Jr. | Guard | Louisville | Freshman |
| 9 | Memphis Grizzlies | Dailyn Swain | Forward | Texas | Junior |
| 10 | Milwaukee Bucks | Yaxel Lendeborg | Forward | Michigan | Senior |
| 11 | Portland Trail Blazers | Nate Ament | Wing | Tennessee | Freshman |
| 12 | Golden State Warriors | Aday Mara | Center | Michigan | Junior |
| 13 | Charlotte Hornets | Hannes Steinbach | Forward/Center | Washington | Freshman |
| 14 | Oklahoma City Thunder (via Sixers) | Brayden Burries | Guard | Arizona | Freshman |
| 15 | Oklahoma City Thunder (via Sixers) | Karim Lopez | Forward | NZ Breakers | Born 2007 |
| 16 | San Antonio Spurs | Koa Peat | Forward | Arizona | Freshman |
| 17 | Miami Heat | Cameron Carr | Wing | Baylor | Junior |
| 18 | Memphis Grizzlies | Jayden Quaintance | Center/Forward | Kentucky | Sophomore |
| 19 | Toronto Raptors | Patrick Ngongba | Center | Duke | Sophomore |
| 20 | Charlotte Hornets | Morez Johnson | Center/Forward | Michigan | Sophomore |
| 21 | Denver Nuggets | Thomas Haugh | Forward | Florida | Junior |
| 22 | Atlanta Hawks | Motiejus Krivas | Center | Arizona | Junior |
| 23 | Detroit Pistons | Bennett Stirtz | Guard | Iowa | Senior |
| 24 | Philadelphia 76ers | Braylon Mullins | Guard | UConn | Freshman |
| 25 | Los Angeles Lakers | Chris Cenac | Center | Houston | Freshman |
| 26 | New York Knicks | Labaron Philon | Guard | Alabama | Sophomore |
| 27 | Boston Celtics | Allen Graves | Forward | Santa Clara | Freshman |
| 28 | Minnesota Timberwolves (via Pistons) | Tyler Tanner | Guard | Vanderbilt | Sophomore |
| 29 | Cleveland Cavaliers | Joshua Jefferson | Forward | Iowa State | Senior |
| 30 | Dallas Mavericks (via OKC) | Ebuka Okorie | Guard | Stanford | Freshman |
Here are the biggest NBA draft themes to watch out for in March Madness.
Who’s No. 1? The race for the top pick is still wide open
BYU’s A.J. Dybantsa, Duke’s Cameron Boozer, and Kansas’ Darryn Peterson have been vying for the No. 1 pick since the start of the season, and it still feels like we’re no closer to knowing who will actually be the first pick in June’s draft. March Madness should go a long way towards determining it regardless of which team eventually wins the draft lottery on May 10.
I’ve been a Boozer guy from the start. He powered his team to literally every championship possible at the high school level, and his impact on winning has carried over seamlessly at Duke this season. If you replaced Boozer with an average ACC power forward, I think Duke finishes fourth or fifth in the conference. Instead, Duke lost two games by a combined four points all year, and enters March Madness as a frontrunner to win it all. Boozer isn’t just the best freshman in the country: he’s by far the best player in the country despite being one of the youngest in the sport with a July 2007 birthday.
Boozer has the “chess master” gene players like Luka Doncic and Nikola Jokic possess. Give him the ball, and your team is going to get a good shot on offense pretty much every time. Yes, Boozer has some limitations with his lack of athletic explosiveness and troubles finishing over length. There are no perfect players, but Boozer’s absurd production and resume of winning at a young age makes him the safest bet to turn into an elite NBA player.
What about Dybantsa and Peterson?
- I’d bet on Dybantsa eventually going No. 1 overall. He passes the eye test with flying colors as a huge wing with the elite athleticism and advanced scoring tools scouts dream about. I love Dybantsa’s bend and flexibility when attacking off the bounce: he’s not even a little bit stiff, and it gives him so many counters when his initial path to the basket is shut off. His playmaking has been better than expected, and I’m interested to see if that continues to be true when he’s outside of BYU’s system. He’s a pretty decent outside shooter right now, and should certainly continue to improve moving forward. I’m not totally sold on what else Dybantsa brings to a team other than scoring. His defensive playmaking numbers are disturbingly bad for someone with his physicality. Does that show a lack of motor? A lack of feel? Or is it the fault BYU’s schemes? Ideally, a team will surround Dybantsa with dirty work guys and let him get all the glory as a scorer. The great thing about players like Jayson Tatum and Cooper Flagg is that they do the dirty work in addition to carrying the scoring burden. I feel like Dybantsa is a cut below those guys entering the draft. Dybantsa is obviously an awesome prospect, but I don’t see him being a clear-cut No. 1 overall pick.
- Darryn Peterson looked like Gen-Z Kobe Bryant coming out of high school. He hasn’t lived up to that billing at Kansas due to a bizarre set of injury circumstances that included “traumatic” cramping and multiple soft tissue strains in his lower body. Peterson just doesn’t look as explosive athletically as he did in high school, but he still put up awesome per-possession scoring numbers in an off-ball role by showing off his elite shotmaking. His freshman tape looks more like Richard Hamilton or Tre Johnson than anything else, bending defenses by darting around screens and splashing shots all over the floor. The fact that his shooting touch and outside volume both look better than expected is an encouraging sign for his star upside if he can regain his physical gifts. I had Peterson at No. 2 for most of the year, but at this point I’m tempted to slide him down to No. 4. Part of that is because North Carolina’s Caleb Wilson looked awesome before his season-ending thumb injury. Part of it is because Peterson just didn’t meet our expectations this season. I wouldn’t be shocked if he totally exploded in March Madness, because he’s got the talent. If the Jayhawks can advance to the second weekend, a likely matchup with Boozer and Duke would be must-see TV.
Darius Acuff is a legendary college player. Will it translate to the NBA?
Acuff has become the most polarizing prospect in the draft. It’s easy to see why so many people love him. The Arkansas point guard has been one of the most productive players in the country as a freshman, averaging 23 points, 6.5 assists, and 3.2 rebounds per game on 51 percent shooting on twos, 44.5 percent shooting on threes, and 80 percent shooting from the foul line. He’s had some ridiculous performances along the way, like putting up 49 points on 27 field goal attempts on Alabama in Feb. or 30 points and 11 assists on his Wario Tyler Tanner and Vanderbilt in the SEC title game. I ranked him as the sixth best player in the NCAA tournament, and that might be underselling him.
Acuff’s biggest believers think he can translate like Jalen Brunson or Damian Lillard as a smaller guard with nuclear offensive ability. There’s a chance it happens: he’s been a deadly pull-up shooter from deep, he has awesome touch on floaters, his passing vision is pretty great, and he’s able to ignite his team in transition. It just feels like having the same offensive impact as Lillard (a top-75 player ever) or Brunson (a top-10 player today) is a high bar to clear. If he only meets it 85 percent of the way or so, his deficiencies will come into greater focus.
I think Acuff is the single worst defender in this class. Part of that is because he shoulders such a huge burden offensively. The other part of it is because he has bad tools and doesn’t give much effort. I feel like Acuff spends most of his energy defensively trying to switch onto an easier assignment. He is currently incapable of containing the ball at the point of attack, and he doesn’t make many plays in the passing lanes either. Acuff enters the tournament with a block rate of 1.0 and a steal rate of 1.3. Here’s the list of the players who have ever been drafted with such poor defensive playmaking numbers. It’s not encouraging.
Brunson currently grades out in the 8th percentile of defensive EPM, and he’s still a great player. Keyonte George ranks as the second-worst defensive player in the league by EPM, and he’s still had a very good season for the Utah Jazz. Brunson is a 98th percentile offensive player, and his team mortgaged the future to get big wings around him like OG Anunoby and Mikal Bridges to provide more defensive support. We haven’t seen George’s impact on winning yet even though his per-game numbers are excellent offensively. Similarly small guards with poor defense like Ja Morant and Trae Young don’t have any trade value on their current contracts.
I just worry Acuff needs to meet a really high bar offensively to make up for his bad defense. What if he’s not really a 44.5 percent three-point shooter? What if all of his tough floater looks don’t go in as often against NBA rim protectors? There’s also the pesky issue that no one wants a small guard these days. I wanted to put Acuff at No. 5 to Washington, but went with Keaton Wagler because I can’t see them pairing Young and Acuff in the backcourt. Would the Jazz really even want him next to George? Would the Hawks want another small guard after getting out of the Trae Young business for only a salary dump? He doesn’t seem like a Memphis type of player. The Bucks already have two nice “Moneyball” finds at guard in Kevin Porter Jr. and Ryan Rollins, and they need defense and rebounding.
Acuff is super fun to watch, and he’s obviously really good at basketball. He’s just entering the league at a time when no one wants one position defenders, let alone zero position defenders like him. I have him rated as a solid first-round pick, but he scares me inside the top-10. I can’t wait to see what he does in this tournament, because he feels specifically tailored to have an iconic March performance. If it happens, some team (probably the Sacramento Kings) will go for the offensive upside and worry about the other side of the ball later.
Which NBA prospects can cement their draft stock in March Madness?
- Keaton Wagler, G, Illinois: I identified the Illini as a Final Four sleeper months ago. They received a favorable path through the bracket, but would likely have to go through No. 2 Houston and then No. 1 Florida to win the regional. Wagler’s star turn has been one of the best stories in the country this year, but it feels like he’s cooled off a little lately. He can certify his top-10 status by leading his team on a deep March run that shows off his knockdown shooting off the dribble, playmaking, and high feel for the game.
- Nate Ament, F, Tennessee: Ament struggled with his efficiency out of the gates, but hit his stride in conference play. He was considered the No. 4 recruit in the country behind the ‘big three’ entering the year and will probably get the benefit of the doubt from teams based off that pedigree. He can still have some really ugly games when he’s not making shots because his finishing is shaky, he’s not strong enough to play through contact, and his three-ball only finished at 33 percent. Ament theoretically has great tools as a 6’10 wing with two-way upside, but he’s not actually a great player yet. Tennessee just always feels like it’s in a rock fight, so it’s fair to point out his team context does him no favors. If he’s really going to be a top-10 pick this year, let’s see him have at least one big scoring night and complete two-way performance in March.
- Braylon Mullins, G, UConn: I had Mullins pretty low at No. 24 in this mock, but he could easily become a lottery pick with a strong tournament performance for UConn. I’ve been waiting for him to breakout all year, but it hasn’t really happened save for a great effort in the Big East tournament semifinals against a lousy Georgetown team. I like the idea of Mullins as a high-volume three-point shooter with soft touch who competes defensively. A preseason ankle injury and subsequent concussion did him no favors this year. I keep waiting to be solid on him based off his skill set and high school reputation, but he keeps leaving me wanting more. He can change that perception in March.
Who are the most important players in March Madness?
- Patrick Ngongba, C, Duke: Ngongba missed the ACC tournament with a sore foot, and Duke definitely needs him in the lineup to win it all. The sophomore center’s defensive paint protection, playmaking, and soft scoring touch have made him an outstanding complement next to Cam Boozer this season. I’m higher on Ngongba than consensus and would take him in the top-10, I think. I just wish he kicked a little more ass on the glass and played with more of a mean streak. He’ll have plenty of opportunities to prove himself as Duke chases a natty.
- Aday Mara, C, Michigan: Zach Edey and Donovan Clingan’s matchup in the 2024 national championship game started a size obsessed for the top teams in college basketball, and Mara is proof of it. After not being able to earn Mick Cronin’s trust in his first two years at UCLA, he transferred to Michigan and blossomed as a 7’3 big man who excels in drop coverage defensively and has excellent passing ability for his size. The Wolverines are in national championship-or-bust mode, and to do it, Mara needs to be one of the best players on the floor in every game. He can answer some questions about his toughness and physicality inside in this run, and I’d also like to see his shooting touch continue to improve, and for him to look more mobile defensively.
- Brayden Burries, G, Arizona: Arizona is a wagon, and Burries might be emerging into their best player at the most important time. I’ve liked him since I saw him at the McDonald’s Game, but I’ve always been a tad tepid because he’s so old for his grade, turning 21 years old as a freshman during Final Four weekend. Burries strikes me as a guard who is solid everywhere but spectacular nowhere. His burst as a driver is good not great, his shooting is reliable but amazing, his defense is capable but nothing special, etc. I’d feel much better about him as a lottery pick if he balls out in this tournament.
What are the best team fits in this mock draft?
Here’s five team fits I really like:
- Kingston Flemings to the Kings: Quick-twitch driver and playmaker who adds value on both ends at a position of need for Sacramento. Okay, every position is a position of need for the Kings.
- Yaxel Lendeborg to the Bucks: Long, strong, skilled, and versatile. He could really help out Giannis should the Greek superstar return to Milwaukee next year.
- Morez Johnson to the Hornets: Adds toughness, rebounding, a high motor, and maybe some shooting potential. The Hornets might be the East’s team of the future, but they could still stand to beef up the front court.
- Motiejus Krivas to the Hawks: Nasty rim protector for a team with underwhelming rim protection.
- Joshua Jefferson to the Cavs: Feels like a plug-and-play front court guy for a contender with his high-feel, rebounding, and playmaking.
What are you looking forward to in March from a draft perspective?
Do you like your team’s pick? Hate it? Sound off in the comments.
