Tuesday, March 3, 2026
No menu items!
HomeNatureHow infighting led the Maya civilization to catastrophic collapse

How infighting led the Maya civilization to catastrophic collapse

The Four Heavens: A New History of the Ancient Maya David Stuart Princeton Univ. Press (2026)

Before the 1970s, ancient Maya history was impenetrable. The civilization’s grand ceremonial buildings and striking art, created in parts of Mesoamerica during the Classic Maya period (ad 150–900) had tantalized foreign visitors since the arrival of Spanish conquistadors in the sixteenth century. But no one, including several million twentieth-century speakers of Maya languages, could read the ancient Maya hieroglyphs.

Epigrapher David Stuart embraced this challenge while still a child, living with his archaeologist parents in a small village in Mexico’s Yucatán Peninsula, where he learnt to speak the local Yucatec Maya language. He began working with Mayanist Linda Schele to understand the inscriptions of the ancient city-state of Palenque in Chiapas, on the peninsula’s western side.

At 12 years old, he presented his first paper at an international conference in Palenque in 1978. At 18, he became the youngest person to be awarded a MacArthur Fellowship. Today, he is a professor of Mesoamerican art and writing based in the United States and one of the world’s leading specialists on the ancient Maya.

In The Four Heavens, Stuart relates the history of the Maya civilization for non-specialist readers, more than two decades after the last book to attempt this demanding task. To do so, he draws on fresh archaeological discoveries and translations of Maya writings from the twenty-first century. The book’s title is a reference to Maya cosmology, which divided the sky into four ‘sides’, determined by the Sun’s daily and annual movements.

Stuart takes aim at outdated views of the Maya as “quintessential noble savages living in remote cities in the jungle” under the control of impersonal rulers and priests who were “more interested in esoteric knowledge than the concerns of the real world”. Instead, he portrays the Maya as living in a world that consisted of numerous vivid royal courts intertwined by marriages, temporary alliances and warfare, in addition to religion.

Warring dynasties

For example, in the early 1950s, leading scholar Eric Thompson “idealized” the Maya, Stuart notes, and regarded them as a theocracy: time worshippers with an immensely sophisticated calendar and a deeply spiritual outlook. In Thompson’s view, stated in 1972, their puzzling inscriptions were not “syllabic, or alphabetic, in part or in whole” — unlike Egyptian hieroglyphs, which had been deciphered in the 1820s.

Thompson might have been influenced in part by cold war politics. He rejected the pioneering 1950s theory by Russian linguist Yuri Knorosov that the ancient Maya script was partly syllabic — an idea that Knorosov had gleaned from a sketch of symbols made by a Yucatec Maya in the 1560s in a confused conversation with a Spanish friar.

Rectangular stone slate with Maya carved drawings found in the tomb of King Pakal from the Temple of the Inscriptions, Palenque.

Sarcophagus lid from the tomb of Pakal.Credit: Fine Art Images/Heritage Images/Getty

From the 1980s onwards, however, the assessment of the ancient Maya civilization as mainly theocratic changed radically. By then, the Maya script was beginning to be deciphered — partly through phonetic elements. Scholars such as Michael Coe, author of The Maya (1966) and Breaking the Maya Code (1992), observed that these inscriptions showed their rulers to be obsessed with war. “The highest goal of these lineage-proud dynasts was to capture the ruler of a rival city-state in battle,” wrote Coe, “to torture and humiliate him (sometimes for years), and then subject him to decapitation following a ball game which the prisoner was always destined to lose.”

Wars and shifting political alliances are a substantial part of Stuart’s book, too, along with religion. “Maya history is a narrative of many localized ‘fits and starts’ within dynasties, usually instigated by a disruptive war,” he writes. Also prevalent in the book are the names of many Maya settlements, such as Chichén Itzá, Copán, Palenque and Yaxchilán, and rulers, such as Pakal the Great (of Palenque) and Shield Jaguar (of Yaxchilán). Some of these names will be familiar to modern visitors to Mesoamerica, but Stuart also includes many that are not as well known.

Dates are another theme, deciphered using the complex but well-understood Maya calendar. It is made up of three interlocking circular systems. The centre ring contains the numerals 1 to 13, which are then linked to two further rings of 20 named days and 19 named months. The full cycle takes 52 years to complete. Many of the dates on Maya inscriptions are surprisingly precise for records of the ancient world: for example, “a certain royal individual” died on 25 October 726, was buried in his pyramid on 28 October and his heir succeeded him to the throne on 7 January 727.

Although Stuart admits that some readers might find such details “a bit dry or tedious”, on balance the Maya synthesis of down-to-earth facts with fantastical elements in their buildings, art and hieroglyphs should intrigue us all. Interpreting these details will ensure decades more work for Mayanists.

Cosmic perspectives

Consider the sarcophagus lid of Pakal at Palenque in present-day Mexico — perhaps the most famous of all Maya inscriptions. Excavated in 1952 by archaeologist Alberto Ruz Lhuillier from the crypt of the Temple of the Inscriptions, the sarcophagus was gradually deciphered over the course of several decades.

RELATED ARTICLES

Most Popular

Recent Comments