Plant materials and growth conditions
A. thaliana free1 mutant (a T-DNA insertion line) seeds and UBQ10::GFPâFREE1 transgenic seeds were provided by L. Jiang. All other transgenic A. thaliana lines were generated by transformation of corresponding constructs into the heterozygous free1 mutant background and subsequent genotyping of homozygous free1 from progeny. The vps2 mutant (a T-DNA insertion line) seeds were provided by Y. Cheng. The RHA1âmCherry marker line was gifted by L. Qu. Seeds were surface sterilized by ethanol and sown on half-strength Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium with 1.0% sucrose, 0.4% phytagel at pHâ5.8. MS was supplemented with NaCl or sorbitol as indicated. Plate media were stratified at 4â°C for 2âdays and transferred to a growth chamber under a long-day (16âhâ8âh light (22â°C)âdark (18â°C)) photoperiod.
Chemical and osmotic seedling treatments
Wortmannin-treated seedlings were prepared by soaking for 45âmin in liquid MS medium with wortmannin (Selleck, S2758) added at a final concentration of 33âμΠfrom a 33âmM stock solution in dimethyl sulfoxide. For hexanediol treatment, 1,6-hexanediol was added at a final concentration of 4% (w/v) to MS medium with wortmannin (as above) and incubated for 5âmin before imaging. For washout experiments, seedlings were incubated in half-strength MS medium with wortmannin (as above) without 1,6-hexanediol for 1âh before imaging.
For acute NaCl and sorbitol treatments, seedlings were soaked in liquid MS medium supplemented with 125âmM NaCl or 300âmM sorbitol for the indicated times before imaging. To measure germination and seedling survival rates, seeds were sown on MS plate medium supplemented with 125âmM NaCl or 300âmM sorbitol and grown at 22â°C under a long-day (16âhâ8âh light (22â°C)âdark (18â°C)) photoperiod for 10âdays.
Plasmid construction
To generate the constructs for in vitro protein expression, the coding sequences of FREE1 and FREE1 variants (FREE1(ÎIDR), FUS-IDRâFREE1, PTAPâFUS-IDRâFREE1, FUSm-IDRâFREE1 and FLOE1-IDRâFREE1) were amplified and inserted into the pET11-6ÃHis-MBP53 or pET11-6ÃHis vector. The coding sequences of VPS23A, VPS28A, VPS37A, TOL6, TOL9, LIP5 and BRO1 were amplified and inserted into the pRSFduet-6ÃHis-mCherry vector. All cloning was performed using the ClonExpress II One Step Cloning kit (Vazyme, C112).
To generate constructs for transient expression in A. thaliana protoplasts, the coding sequences of FREE1 and FREE1 variants (FREE1(ÎIDR), FUS-IDRâFREE1), and RHA1 were amplified and inserted into modified pBI221 vectors containing a GFP tag or an mCherry tag, respectively.
For complementation constructs, an approximately 1âkb FREE1 promoter region was amplified and inserted into the pCambia1300-N1-GFP vector to generate the pCambia1300-pFREE1-GFP construct. Moreover, the coding sequences of FREE1 and FREE1 variants (FREE1(ÎIDR), FUS-IDRâFREE1, PTAPâFUS-IDRâFREE1, FUSm-IDRâFREE1 and FLOE1-IDRâFREE1) were amplified and inserted into pCambia1300-pFREE1-GFP. All of the resulting constructs were introduced into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV3101 and transformed into the free1 heterozygous mutant using the floral dip method. In brief, A. tumefaciens GV3101 cells were collected and resuspended in a 5% sucrose solution containing 0.02% (v/v) silwet L-77. A. thaliana flower buds were dipped into the A. tumefaciens suspension for 2âmin and subsequently kept in the dark overnight before being transferred to the growth chamber.
For the b-isox precipitation assay, proteins were transiently expressed in Nicotiana benthamiana. The coding sequences of VPS23A, VPS28A, VPS37A, TOL6, TOL9, LIP5 and BRO1 were amplified and inserted into pCambia1300-N1-Flag vector. All of the constructs were introduced into the A. tumefaciens strain GV3101 and infiltrated into N. benthamiana leaves.
For yeast two-hybrid constructs, the coding sequences of FREE1 variants and VPS23A were amplified and inserted between the EcoRI and BamHI restriction sites of pGADT7 and pGBKT7 using the ClonExpress II One Step Cloning kit (Vazyme, C112). A list of all of the coding and primer sequences is provided in Supplementary Table 1.
In vitro protein expression and purification
All fusion proteins were expressed and purified from Escherichia coli (Rosetta) cell extracts on a Ni-NTA column. In brief, protein expression was induced by 0.4âmM isopropyl-β-d-1-thiogalactopyranoside at 18â°C overnight. Cells were collected by centrifugation and resuspended in lysis buffer (40âmM Tris-HCl pHâ7.4, 500âmM NaCl, 10% glycerol). The suspension was sonicated for 30âmin (2âs on, 4âs off, SCIENTZ) and centrifuged at 13,000g for 30âmin at 4â°C. The supernatant was incubated with Ni-NTA agarose for 20âmin, washed and eluted with 40âmM Tris-HCl pHâ7.4, 500âmM NaCl and 500âmM imidazole (Sangon). Proteins were further purified by gel-filtration chromatography (Superdex-200; GE Healthcare) and stored in 40âmM Tris-HCl pHâ7.4, 50 or 500âmM NaCl, 1âmM dithiothreitol on ice or at â80â°C.
In vitro phase-separation assay
The solubility tag MBP was cleaved using TEV protease for 30âmin to induce LLPS. Protein concentrations were determined by measuring absorbance at 280ânm using a NanoDrop ND-1000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Proteins were diluted to various salt (50â500âmM NaCl) and protein (0.05â20âμÎ) concentrations in 384-well plates (Greiner Bio One, 781090) and observed using the Zeiss LSM880 confocal laser-scanning microscope equipped with a Ã63 objective.
To quantify the partition coefficient of VPS proteins by FREE1 condensates, regions of interest of equivalent size were analysed in the Fiji implementation of ImageJ to calculate the VPS signal intensity inside and outside FREE1 condensates. The partition coefficient was defined as intracondensate fluorescence intensity divided by the fluorescence intensity of the extracondensate solution.
FRAP analysis
FRAP analysis was performed on the Olympus Fluoview FV-1000 confocal laser-scanning microscope. Condensates were photobleached using a 488ânm Ar-laser pulse at maximum intensity. Time-lapse recordings of intensity changes were analysed using the Fiji implementation of ImageJ.
Transient expression in A. thaliana protoplasts
A. thaliana mesophyll protoplasts were isolated from 3-week-old Col-0 plants as previously described54. In brief, leaf slices from the middle part of a leaf were incubated in enzyme solution (20âmM MES pHâ5.7, 1.5% (w/v) cellulase R10, 0.4% (w/v) macerozyme R10, 0.4âM mannitol and 20âmM KCl) for 3âh. The suspension was centrifuged and washed twice with W5 solution (2âmM MES pHâ5.7, 154âmM NaCl, 125âmM CaCl2 and 5âmM KCl). Plasmids were transformed into protoplasts using the PEG-calcium-mediated method (40% PEG3350). The transfected protoplasts were incubated at 22â°C for 16âh in WI solution (0.5âM mannitol, 4âmM MES pHâ5.7 and 20âmM KCl) and observed under the Zeiss LSM880 confocal laser-scanning microscope equipped with a Ã63 objective. The colocalization coefficient was defined as the ratio of VPS23 fluorescence intensity relative to FREE1 fluorescence intensity in the same condensate. Data analysis was performed in the Fiji implementation of ImageJ.
b-isox precipitation
The precipitation of ESCRT proteins by b-isox was performed as described previously. In brief, 0.5âg of fine powder ground from tobacco leaves was lysed in extraction buffer (10âmM Tris-Cl pHâ7.5, 150âmM NaCl, 5âmM MgCl2, 20âmM β-mercaptoethanol, 0.5% NP-40; 10% glycerol, 1à protease inhibitor cocktail). The cell lysate was then clarified by centrifugation. Then, 500âµl protein extract was incubated with 30âµM b-isox at 4â°C for 1âh and centrifuged. The precipitate was washed twice with ice-cold extraction buffer and boiled in SDS loading buffer (100âmM Tris-HCl pHâ7.4, 4% SDS, 0.2% bromophenol blue, 20% glycerol, 5% β-mercaptoethanol). For precipitation of FREE1, ten-day-old A. thaliana Col-0 seedlings were used. For precipitation of other ESCRT proteins, each Flag-tagged protein was transiently expressed and resulting tobacco cells were used for precipitation.
Immunoblot analysis
To prepare total protein extracts, A. thaliana seedlings were ground in liquid nitrogen and lysed with extraction buffer (40âmM HEPES-KOH at pHâ7.5, 1âmM EDTA, 10âmM KCl, 0.4âM sucrose with 1 Ã cOmplete Protease Inhibitor Cocktail). Debris was removed by centrifugation at 12,000g for 30âmin. Protein samples were separated by 10% SDSâPAGE and transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane. Primary antibodies were used against FREE1, Flag (Merck, F1804, 1:2,000), GFP (Roche, 11814460001, 1:7,000), tubulin (Sigma-Aldrich, T5168, 1:2,000), ubiquitin (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, sc-8017; 1:1,000) or His-tag (Sangon, D110002, 1:1,000). The horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated secondary antibodies goat anti-Mouse (CWBIO, CW0102, dilute at 1:10,000) and goat anti-rabbit (CWBIO, CW0103, 1:10,000) were used for protein detection by chemiluminescence (ChemiDoc, LAS4000).
Confocal microscopy
Confocal imaging was performed using the Zeiss LSM880 or Olympus Fluoview FV-1000 microscope equipped with Ã63/1.4âNA oil and Ã60/1.2âNA water-immersion objectives. GFP was excited at 488ânm and detected between 490ânm and 530ânm or between 500ânm and 544ânm. mCherry and DiIC18 were excited at 561ânm and detected at 579â650ânm or 570â670ânm.
Cell culture and transfection
Maintenance of cell lines and transfection were performed as described previously55. COS-7 and HEK293T cells were maintained in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS at 37â°C in 5% CO2. Transfection was performed using X-tremeGENE HP (Roche, 28088300) according to the manufacturerâs protocols.
Lentiviral transduction
For lentiviral transduction, HEK293T cells were transfected with pFUGW (together with VSVG and psPAX2 plasmids). Viruses were harvested at 60â72âh post transfection, and the viral supernatant was centrifuged at 600âg for 5âmin to remove cell debris. The indicated cells were infected with the viral supernatant diluted with fresh medium (30% viral supernatant) containing 10âµg mlâ1 polybrene.
Immunofluorescence microscopy and quantification
After being infected with indicated lentiviruses for 72âh, the cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 15âmin at room temperature and used for imaging. For super-resolution microscopy, imaging experiments were performed using the Nikon combined confocal A1/SIM/STORM system with four excitation/imaging lasers (405, 488 and 561ânm from Coherent, 647ânm from MPBC) and a CFI Apo SR TIRF Ã100/1.49âNA oil-immersion objective. Images were acquired using an Andor EMCCD camera (iXON 897). Data analyses were performed using the NIS-Elements AR (Nikon) software. All SIM images were acquired as z-stack images.
TEM and immuno-gold labelling in mammalian cells
COS-7 cells were fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde for 1âh at room temperature and washed three times (15âmin each) with 0.1âM PB. Post-fixation staining was performed with 1% osmium tetroxide (SPI, 1250423) for 30âmin on ice. Cells were washed three times (for 15âmin each) with ultrapure water and placed in 1% aqueous uranyl acetate (EMS, 22400) at 4â°C overnight. The samples were then washed three times (15âmin each) with ultrapure water, dehydrated in a cold-graded ethanol series (50%, 70%, 80%, 90%, 100%, 100%, 100%; 2âmin each), and infiltrated with EPON 812 resin using 1:1 (v/v) resin and ethanol for 8âh, 2:1 (v/v) resin and ethanol for 8âh, 3:1 (v/v) resin and ethanol for 8âh, pure resin 2 à 8âh. After a final infiltration with fresh resin, the samples were polymerized at 60â°C for 48âh. Embedded samples were sliced into 75-nm-thick sections and stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate (C1813156) before imaging on the HT-7800 120âkV transmission electron microscope (Hitachi High-Technologies).
Immuno-gold labelling was performed as described previously56 with some modifications. In brief, COS-7 cells were incubated in 2% paraformaldehyde and 0.01% glutaraldehyde in PB buffer at 4â°C overnight and then washed with chilled PB/glycine. Cells were next scraped from the bottom of plastic dishes into 1% gelatine, centrifuged at 1,000ârpm for 2âmin and resuspended in 12% gelatine at 37â°C for 10âmin. The gelatineâcell mixture was then solidified on ice for 15âmin. Small blocks (about 0.5âmm3) were cut and immersed in 2.3âM sucrose overnight at 4â°C. Then, 70-nm-thick cryosections were prepared at â120â°C with an ultramicrotome (Leica, EM FC7). After the sections were thawed at room temperature, immunolabelling was performed using rabbit anti-GFP antibodies followed by the immune-gold secondary antibody. The sections were then treated with methyl cellulose/uranyl acetate and subsequently imaged using the HT-7800 120âkV transmission electron microscope (Hitachi High-Technologies).
Expression of FREE1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
FREE1 ORFs were amplified and inserted into a pRS416 yeast expression vector containing the GAP1 promotor sequence (pAM199). Vectors were transformed into SEY6210 wild-type cells (yAM007) and grown in SDCA medium (0.17% yeast nitrogen base without amino acids and ammonium sulphate, 0.5% ammonium sulphate, 0.5% casamino acids, 2% glucose, 100âμM l-histidine, 100âμM l-tryptophan) overnight. Cells were then diluted into fresh SDCA medium and grown for 4âh. Before imaging, vacuolar membranes were stained for 15âmin in medium containing 160âμM FM4-64 dye, washed twice and chased for a further 30âmin in fresh medium. Imaging was performed on the SpinSR10 spinning-disc confocal microscope, and the recorded images were deconvoluted using the Cellsens software (Olympus).
Dot blot for PI3P-binding assay
PI3P lipids (Avanti Polar Lipids, 850187P) were spotted onto nitrocellulose membranes (Millipore) at the indicated concentrations (2%, 200âpmol; 1%, 100âpmol; 0.5%, 50âpmol; 0.1%, 10âpmol; 0.05%, 5âpmol). These membranes were then blocked in 5â10âml blocking buffer (3% BSA in PBS-T buffer) for 1âh at room temperature, incubated with 10ânM of the indicated GFP-tagged protein (in blocking buffer) for 1âh at room temperature and washed three times (5âmin each) with PBS-T buffer. GFP fluorescence was detected using the ChemiDoc imaging system (Bio-Rad).
Membrane flotation assay
SUVs were prepared as described previously55. In brief, lipids were mixed as POPC:POPS:cholesterol:PtdIns(3)P:PE at a molar ratio of 62:10:25:1:1 in trichloromethane. The lipids were dried under a nitrogen stream and further dried for 1âh at 37â°C. The lipid film was then hydrated using Tris buffer (40âmM Tris HCl, pHâ7.4, 150âmM NaCl) and subjected to 10 cycles of freezing in liquid nitrogen and thawing in a 42â°C water bath. Liposomes were extruded through a 400ânm pore size polycarbonate film to produce the SUVs. Proteins (100ânM) were then added to the SUV solution and incubated for 5âmin at room temperature. To remove unbound protein, a membrane flotation procedure was then performed. For each 120âμl SUVâprotein solution, 480âμl 50% OptiPrep was added. The mixture was overlaid with 480âμl 30% OptiPrep and 90âμl Tris buffer (40âmM Tris HCl, pHâ7.4, 50âmM NaCl). After centrifugation at 100,000g for 2âh, 60âμl of the top fraction containing the protein-bound SUVs was collected. To ensure equal loading of SUVs, 1âμl of the top fraction was used to measure the PC concentration using the Phospholipid C Kit (Wako, 433-36201). The top fraction as well as the total fraction were boiled in SDS loading buffer and used for immunoblot analyses.
Yeast two-hybrid assay
The yeast two-hybrid assay was performed using the Matchmaker Gold Y2H system according to the manufacturerâs instructions (Clontech). In brief, the constructs were co-transformed pairwise into yeast strain AH109 and cultured on SD/âTrpâLeu medium for 3âdays. The interaction was analysed by spreading transformed cells (103â107 cells per ml) onto selective SD/âTrpâLeuâHisâAde medium supplemented with 5âmM 3-amino-1,2,4-triazole (3-AT).
TEM analysis of plant samples
Observation of ILVs by TEM was performed as previously described. In brief, root tips from five-day-old A. thaliana seedlings or germinated seeds were subjected to high-pressure freezing (EM PACT2, Leica) and substituted by acetone containing 0.4% uranyl acetate at â85â°C overnight in an AFS freeze-substitution unit (Leica). Next, the samples were infiltrated with increasing concentrations of HM20 (33â66â100%), embedded and ultraviolet polymerized for 48â72âh. Ultrathin sections were cut on the Leica UC7 ultramicrotome. Ultrathin section on grids were observed using the 80âkV Hitachi H-7650 transmission electron microscope (Hitachi High-Technologies) equipped with a charge-coupled device camera.
GUV preparation
GUVs were generated by the electroformation method57 with modifications58. The lipid mixture contained 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-glycero-3-phosphocholine (POPC, Avanti Polar Lipids) and 1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phospho-(1â²-myo-inositol-3â²-phosphate) (PI(3)P, Avanti Polar Lipids,) at a 9:1 molar ratio. Vesicles were fluorescently labelled by addition of 0.4âmol% membrane dye (DiIC18, Sigma-Aldrich). Lipid films were deposited onto indium-tin-oxide-coated glass plates (PGO) using glass syringes and 4âmM lipid stocks in chloroform, maintained for 1âh under vacuum and subsequently assembled into a chamber with a 2âmm Teflon spacer. The chamber was held together by binder clips, filled with 170âmM sucrose solution (Osmomat 3000 basic, Gonotec) connected to a function generator and an alternating current of 3.5âV and 10âHz frequency was applied for approximately 2âh at 30â°C. GUVs were carefully collected, concentrated by sedimentation following a 1:10 dilution in isosmotic glucose solution and stored at room temperature until use.
GUV wetting and ILV formation assays
FREE1 condensates were generated by TEV cleavage of MBP from FREE1-MBP in 96-well high-content imaging plates coated by applying and drying a 1% polyvinyl alcohol (146â186âkDa, Sigma-Aldrich) solution in water before use. To quantify FREE1 condensateâGUV contact angles, GUVs were added 1â2âmin after micrometre-sized FREE1 condensates had formed in an iso-osmotic solution (40âmM Tris-HCl pHâ8.0, 50âmM NaCl, 1âmM dithiothreitol). Confocal sections of condensate-GUV contacts were used to measure all three angles at the three-phase contact line and to compute the Youngâs contact angle (Extended Data Fig. 7b). For membrane fission assays, GUVs and the isosmotic TEV solution were first mixed before addition of FREE1âMBP and immediate imaging by confocal microscopy (Olympus Fluoview FV-1000) as described above.
Computer simulations
The computational model incorporates three fluid phases: a fluid inside the vesicle and two immiscible fluids surrounding the vesicle. The vesicle was modelled as a fluidic inextensible membrane with bending stiffness. The model includes the fluid motion of each of the three fluid phases coupled to the motion of the membrane. Membrane mechanics are governed by out of plane bending stiffness κ and in-plane stretching elasticity. To solve the coupled physical system, we developed a numerical model based on the combination of the three-phase fluid model for wetting59 and the elastic shell model60 (further details are provided in Supplementary Note 1).
The stretching resistance of the membrane was assumed to be large enough that the membrane stretches locally less than 3%. An initially elongated membrane (Extended Data Fig. 7d) was put in contact with a half circular condensate with surface tension Ïβγ (Supplementary Note 1), where the excess membrane area was set to allow for the condensate to be fully enclosed. Owing to the capillary forces of the condensate, both the membrane and droplet mutually remodel. The simulation model captures the full interaction of membrane bending stiffness, fluid motions and wetting deformations, enabling it to characterize intermediate shapes and time scales of the process.
Theory of condensate-mediated membrane scission
To understand the conditions under which membrane necks close, the stability of such necks and the timing of their scission, the energy of the system E(Rne), which depends on the radius of the neck Rne, was considered. This energy includes contributions corresponding to the bending energy of the membrane (of which the properties are affected by the presence of the condensate), the wetting and surface tension energies of the condensate and the line tension of the three-phase contact line (Supplementary Note 2). The force on the closed neck was calculated as \(f={\left.\frac{{\rm{d}}E\left({R}_{{\rm{ne}}}\right)}{{\rm{d}}{R}_{{\rm{ne}}}}\right|}_{{R}_{{\rm{ne}}}=0}\). For fâ<â0, the force acts to expand the neck, giving rise to either lens-like morphologies or endocytosis-like morphologies with wide necks (Fig. 4a). For 0ââ¤âfââ¤âfâ, the force constricts the neck into a closed form, but is not large enough to induce scission. Finally, for fâ>âfââââ25âpN, strong constriction causes scission of the neck.
Statistics and reproducibility
Sample sizes are chosen as widely used in the field. Biological and technical replicates were performed as described in the Methods for each experiment and conform to standards in the field. Exact n numbers for each experiment are provided in each figure legend. No data were excluded from analysis. Randomization of samples was performed. Seedlings from different plates were collected. Blinding was not deemed necessary in our study because we made no a priori assumptions on the response of the different samples to the experimental treatment, samples were all treated in parallel and all samples treated were always measured. Cells used in this study have been tested negative for mycoplasma contamination.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.