Statistics and reproducibility
Unless otherwise noted, representative images depict one of three biological replicates.
Bacterial and phage growth and culture conditions
E. coli was routinely grown in LB medium at 37â°C unless otherwise stated. Phages were propagated and handled as described previously4.
Plasmid and strain construction
Primers, strains and plasmids are listed in Supplementary Tables 2, 3 and 4, respectively. In all cases, when plasmids were used as PCR templates, PCR samples were treated with DpnI at 37â°C for 1âh to eliminate the plasmid template before transformation. Finished DNA constructs were transformed into DH5α and verified with Sanger and/or long-read sequencing (Primordium) before transformation into the wild-type MG1655 background. For phage assays, the cmdTAC operon was present in low-copy pCD1 (Chloramphenicol-resistant (Cmr), pSC101 origin of replication) and expressed from its native promoter (Pnative). To construct the variant pCV49 (cmdT*AC) by site-directed mutagenesis, complementary primers containing the Y to A mutation (CV109 and CV110) were used to amplify pCD2 for 15 cycles with KAPA DNA polymerase. pCV39 was constructed using the same primer set with pCD4 as the plasmid template.
Low-copy, Pnative–cmdTANT-3ÃHAC (pCV43) was engineered using primers CV127 and CV128 to amplify pCD2 such that amplicon ends were located downstream of the CmdA start codon. A synthetic DNA fragment with three YPYDVPDYA codons plus GGGSGGG linker codons (3ÃHA tag, CV115) with ends complementary to the PCR-amplified vector was then ligated to this vector amplicon by Gibson assembly. Pnative–cmdTACNT-Flag (pCV44) (NT Flag indicates an N-terminal Flag tag) was constructed by amplification of pCD2 with outward facing and 5â²-phosphorylated primers CV120 and CV122 which included DYKDDDDK codons followed by intramolecular blunt-end ligation with T4 DNA ligase. To construct Pnative–cmdTCT-FlagAC, primers CD41 and CD42 were used to amplify pCD2 and primers CD43 and CD44 were used to amplify C-terminally Flag-tagged (CT-Flag) CmdT sequence from pCD10 (see below for pCD10 construction) which was then ligated using Gibson assembly. To construct Pnative–cmdTCT-FlagANT-3ÃHACNT-His6 (pCV42), first, a His6 epitope tag encoding fragment was added to cmdC on pCD2 by the intramolecular blunt-end ligation strategy using primers CV120 and CV122. Next, primers CD41 and CD42 were used to amplify this plasmid and primers CD43 and CD44 were used to amplify CT-Flag cmdT from pCD10 which was then assembled using Gibson assembly. Finally, to insert three tandem HA tags onto the N terminus of CmdA, this intermediate construct was amplified by PCR with CV123 and CV124 such that amplicon ends were located downstream of the CmdA ATG start codon. The synthetic DNA fragment CV115 (HA tag) was used as a PCR template with primers CV125 and CV126 which was then ligated to the vector amplicon by Gibson assembly to produce pCV42.
To construct pCV45 used for the deletion of alt.-3 from T4, complimentary oligonucleotides CV118 and CV119 with pCAS9 compatible overhanging sites were annealed by slow cooling from 98â°C in the presence of 50âmM NaCl to form a duplex spacer insert. pCAS9 and the annealed oligonucleotide were incubated with T4 DNA ligase and BsaI-v2 (NEB) in a one-pot reaction.
For pBAD30 constructs (kanamycin-resistant (Kmr), medium-copy p15a origin), primers CD5 and CD6 were used to amplify and linearize pBAD30. Insert fragments were amplified with the relevant primers (CD7-10, CD13-15, CD20-21, CD30-33, CD38-40) using T4 genomic DNA, plasmid DNA, or MG1655 genomic DNA as a template. pBAD-cmdTNT-HISA (pCD19) was created using PCR site-directed mutagenesis of pCD4 using primers CD45 and CD46. pBAD-cmdTNT-HIS (âcmdA, pCD9) was created by using primers CV1 and CV2 (which exclude the open reading frame of cmdA) to amplify pCD19. This PCR amplicon was intramolecularly ligated with T4 DNA ligase. In some experiments, pAJM677 (Kmr, p15A origin), a variant of pBAD, was used to express CmdTA due to its higher expression after induction with arabinose and tighter repression (pCV41). To engineer pCV41, pAJ677 was amplified and linearized with primers CV113 and CV114. The insert containing cmdTA was amplified from pCD4 with primers CV116 and CV117. Plasmid and insert fragments were ligated by Gibson Assembly. To add the 3ÃHA tag to cmdA in this context, pCV41 was used as a PCR template with primers CV127 and CV128, and this amplicon was ligated to CV115 fragment by Gibson assembly. Anhydrotetracycline inducible (Ptet) pIF (carbenicillin-resistant (Cbr), low-copy pSC101 origin) and pKVS45 (Cbr, p15A origin) constructs were similarly constructed by PCR amplification of the vectors using primers CD24 and CD25 and inserts (CD26-29, CD36-37), followed by Gibson assembly.
To construct the gp23 expression plasmid pCD16, primers CD16 and CD17 or CD18 and CD19 were used to amplify the high-copy origin from pUC19 (pMB1* origin) and pBAD30 without its origin, respectively. These fragments were assembled using Gibson assembly to create a high-copy inducible vector. Subsequently, the backbone was amplified by PCR using primers CD5 and CD6 and gp23 was amplified by PCR from T4 genomic DNA using primers CD34 and CD35. The two fragments were ligated using Gibson assembly.
Plaque and phage assays
Overnight cultures of indicated strains were mixed 1:80 with melted LB with 0.5% agar and then overlaid on plates containing LB with 1.2% agar. For plaque assays done with induction of an arabinose-inducible promoter, base layer plates contained 0.2% w/w arabinose. A tenfold dilution series of the indicated phage was spotted onto plates and the plates grown at 30â°C overnight and plaque-forming units (PFU) were enumerated. log10(protection) (Fig. 1c) was measured as âlog10 EOP, where EOP is the ratio PFUexperimental/PFUcontrol, where the subscript indicates the conditions. Unless otherwise noted, experiments were performed in biological triplicate and representative images are shown.
To measure survival of strains infected with T4, overnight cultures were diluted to OD600 0.1. Cultures were grown to OD600 0.3 and then adjusted to ~3âÃâ107 colony-forming units (CFUs) in a 1âml volume in a 1.7âml Eppendorf tube. Cells were infected with T4 at an MOI of 10 and incubated at 37â°C with rotation. At 0 and 18âmin post-infection, cells were pelleted and washed twice with PBS to remove excess phages. One-hundred microlitres of tenfold dilutions were spread onto LB agar plates with chloramphenicol or kanamycin and CFUs were quantified. Survival was measured as CFUâmlâ1 at 18âmin post-infection divided by CFUâmlâ1 at 0âmin post-infection. To combat progeny phages in the empty vector strain inhibiting CFU formation, all samples were plated with ~107 âchloramphenicol-treated, chloramphenicol-sensitive companion plating cells (MG1655).
ECOI assays were conducted by diluting overnight cultures to OD600 0.1 in 20âml LB. Cultures were grown until they reached OD600 0.3â0.4 at which point they were infected with T4 at an MOI of 0.1. After 20âmin, 1âml was pelleted and washed twice with PBS. One-hundred microlitres of tenfold dilutions were mixed with 50âµl of indicator strain and 3âml LB 0.5% agar and overlayed onto LB plates. To control for unadsorbed phages, a âompC strain (OmpC is the receptor for T4) was assayed in parallel. CFUs were enumerated and ECOI was calculated as PFUâmlâ1 of the cmdTAC-containing strain divided by PFUâmlâ1 of empty vector, after subtracting PFUâmlâ1 of the âompC control experiment from each value.
To determine burst size, cell cultures of empty vector and CmdTAC-containing strains were grown in LBâ+â20âµgâmlâ1 chloramphenicol in a water bath at 37â°C until OD600 measured 0.5. l-Tryptophan was then added to 20âµgâmlâ1 to each culture to assist adsorption of T4. One hundred microlitres of a 107âPFUâmlâ1 T4 stock were added to 9.9âml of each culture and incubated without shaking for 2âmin to allow adsorption. Next, for each culture, 100âµl T4-infected culture from this adsorption flask was added to 9.9âml LBâ+â20âµgâmlâ1 chloramphenicol (flask A). Flask A was again diluted 1:10 into flask B, and again 1:10 into flask C. Five hundred microlitres from flask A was added to 200âµl ice-cold chloroform and vortexed for 10âs. Viable PFUs from this chloroform-treated sample represent unadsorbed phage (adsorption control). Next, 100âµl from each flask A (time 0 sample) or the adsorption control was mixed with 3.5âml LB 0.5% agar maintained at 50â°C to which was added 50âµl of an overnight culture of indicator strain. This mixture was vortexed briefly and overlayed onto LBâ+â20âµgâmlâ1 chloramphenicol + 1.2% agar plates. All flasks were then left to incubate in a shaking water bath at 30â°C. After 60âmin, 100âµl from flask C of the empty vector strain and flask A of the +cmdTAC strain were overlayed with indicator strain on agar plates. After overnight incubation at 37â°C, plaques were enumerated, and normalized to the adsorption control. Burst size was recorded as the number of plaques from each plate multiplied by their dilution factor, and then divided by the number of plaques at time 0.
Growth curves
For measuring growth during T4 infection, overnight cultures of +cmdTAC and empty vector cells were back-diluted 1:200 in 96-well plates and infected with T4 at the indicated MOIs. Cultures were grown at 37â°C with orbital shaking on a plate reader (Biotek) for 6âh. For ectopic expression of Gp23 and Gp31 with CmdTAC, overnight cultures were back-diluted to OD600 of 0.05 in M9Lâ+â0.2% w/w glucose + 100ângâmlâ1 anhydrotetracycline (aTc) and grown for 3âh at 37â°C to pre-induce Gp31. Cultures were then pelleted and resuspended at an OD600 of 0.05 in fresh M9Lâ+â0.2% w/w glucose + 100ângâmlâ1 aTc or M9Lâ+â0.2% w/w glucose + 100ângâmlâ1 aTc. Cultures were grown at 37â°C with orbital shaking on a plate reader for 12âh.
RNA extraction following phage infection
Overnight cultures of +cmdTAC and empty vector cells were back-diluted and grown at 37â°C to OD600 between 0.2 and 0.3 before being infected with T4 at a MOI of 10. RNA was extracted from cells at multiple timepoints post-infection as previously described44. In brief, 1âml of cells was mixed with 1âml of boiling lysis buffer (SDS 2%, 4âmM EDTA pH 8) and incubated at 100â°C for 5âmin before flash freezing in liquid nitrogen. Two millilitres of acid-buffered phenol solution (pH 4.3, Sigma) heated to 67â°C was added to thawed samples, vortexed, and then incubated at 67â°C for 2âmin. Samples were spun down at 20,000g for 10âmin and hot phenol extraction repeated on the collected aqueous layer. A third extraction was then done using 2âml of acid-buffered phenol-chloroform solution (Ambion). RNA from the final extraction was then precipitated at â20â°C for at least 1âh or at â80â°C overnight with 1à volume isopropanol, 1/10à volume 3âM sodium acetate (pH 5.5, Thermo Fisher), and 1/100à volume GlycoBlue. RNA was pelleted by centrifugation at 4â°C and 20,000g for 30âmin. Pellets were washed twice with 800âml of ice-cold 70% ethanol, air-dried, and resuspended in 90âμl RNAse-free H2O (Thermo Fisher).
To remove DNA, 10âμl of 10à Turbo DNase buffer (Ambion) and 2âμl of Turbo DNase I (Ambion) was added to each sample and incubated at 37â°C for 20âmin. An additional 2âμl of Turbo DNase I was then added, and samples again incubated at 37â°C for 20âmin. RNA was extracted from this digest by precipitation with 3à volume ethanol, 1/10à volume 3âM sodium acetate (pH 5.5), and 1/100à volume GlycoBlue. Pelleting and washing were performed the same as described above. RNA yield was verified using a NanoDrop spectrophotometer.
RNA extraction from non-infected cells
Cells were grown until desired conditions and then 900âμl of culture was mixed with 100âμl of stop solution (5% acid phenol, 95% ethanol) and inverted to mix. Samples were then spun down at 13,000g for 30âs, the supernatant removed, and pellets flash frozen in liquid nitrogen. To each pellet, 400âμl of TRIzol Reagent (Invitrogen) heated to 65â°C was added and mixed using a thermomixer for 10âmin at 65â°C and 2,000 rpm before freezing at â80â°C for at least 10âmin. Samples were thawed and then centrifuged at 20,000g for 5âmin at 4â°C to pellet any debris and the TRIzol solution moved to a new tube. RNA was purified using the Direct-zol RNA Miniprep kit (Zymo Research) following manufactureâs protocol including optional on-column DNAse treatment. RNA yield was verified using a NanoDrop spectrophotometer.
Immuno-northern blotting
Novex 6% TBE-urea gels in 1à TBE buffer (Invitrogen) were pre-run at 180âV for at least 50âmin prior to sample loading. Each RNA sample was mixed with equal volume of Novex 2à TBE-urea sample buffer (Invitrogen), heated at 90â°C for 10âmin, and then placed on ice for 2â3âmin just before loading. Gels were run at 180âV for 30â50âmin depending on expected product length. Gels were removed from casing and incubated in 40âml 1à TBE with added 4âμl of SYBR Gold stain (Thermo Fisher) for 10âmin. Gels were imaged on a ChemiDoc MP imaging system (Bio-Rad) set for SYBR Gold imaging. RNA was transferred from the gel to a Hybond-N+ nylon membrane (Cytiva) via semi-dry transfer at 0.38âA for 90âmin. After transfer, RNA was bound to the membrane by exposure to 120,000âμJ of UV radiation in a Stratalinker UV Crosslinker. Membranes were then incubated with shaking in 0.2% iBlock (Invitrogen) in 1à PBST for 10âmin at room temperature or overnight at 4â°C. Primary antibody treatment was done with Poly/Mono-ADP Ribose rabbit antibody (Cell Signaling Technologies) diluted 1:1,000 in 0.2% iBlock + 1à PBST either for 2âh at room temperature or overnight at 4â°C with shaking. Following primary antibody treatment, membranes were washed 3 times for 10âmin each with 1à PBST. For secondary antibody treatment, membranes were incubated for 1âh with shaking at room temperature with goat anti-rabbit IgG (Hâ+âL) secondary antibody, HRP (Invitrogen) diluted 1:1,000 in 0.2% iBlock + 1à PBST. Membranes were then again washed 3 times for 10âmin each in 1à PBST. Signal was developed using SuperSignal West Femto maximum sensitivity substrate (Thermo Fisher) and imaged on a ChemiDoc MP imaging system set for chemiluminescence detection. Dot blots were conducted identically except 250âng DNA or 1âµg RNA were spotted on membranes.
For agarose immuno-northern blots, 0.8âg of agarose was melted in 66.7âml of H2O and allowed to cool to 65â°C. 8âml of 0.2âM (10Ã) 3-(N-morpholino)propanesulfonic acid (MOPS) buffer, 5.4âml of formaldehyde and 5âµl of 10âmgâmlâ1 ethidium bromide were added to the agarose, and a 14Ã12âcm gel was cast and allowed to cool. 4âµg RNA were added to 17âµl sample buffer (2âµl 10à MOPS, 4âµl formaldehyde, 10âµl de-ionized formamide, and 1âµl ethidium bromide) and samples were denatured at 80â°C for 10âmin then cooled on ice for 5âmin. Prior to sample loading, the empty gel was run at 115âV for 5âmin. 2âµl of loading dye (50% glycerol, bromophenol blue and xylene cyanol) were added to each RNA sample. Samples were then electrophoresed at 100âV for 80âmin in 1à MOPS buffer. The gel was visualized before soaking in H2O for 10âmin followed by a 20-minute equilibration in transfer buffer (3âM NaCl, 0.01âN NaOH). RNA was transferred onto Hybond-N+ nylon membrane by upward capillary transfer at room temperature for 75âmin in transfer buffer. Immunoblotting was performed as described above. All immunoblotting experiments were performed in at least biological duplicate.
RNA immunoprecipitation and sequencing
Cells were collected and RNA collected as described above for infected cells. rRNA was removed using a previously described ribosomal RNA subtraction method46. rRNA-depleted RNA was then fragmented using sonication. For each sample to be sonicated, 4 μg of RNA was added to 100âμl 1à TE buffer (Sigma) in a 1.5âml TPX microtube (Diagenode) and incubated on ice for 15âmin. Tubes were then placed in a Bioruptor 300 sonicator water bath chilled to 4â°C for 60 cycles of 30âs on, 30âs off at high power setting. Every ten cycles tubes were briefly spun down in a microcentrifuge to ensure all liquid stayed below the water line in the sonicator. Each sample was then brought to a total volume of 200âμl with RNAse-free water and then precipitated at â20â°C for at least 1âh or at â80â°C overnight with 600âμl 100% ethanol, 20âμl of 3âM sodium acetate (pH 5.5), and 2âμl GlycoBlue. RNA was pelleted by centrifugation at 4â°C and 21,000g for 30âmin. Pellets were washed twice with 800âml of ice-cold 70% ethanol, air-dried, and resuspended in 90âμl RNAse-free H2O.
ADP ribose RNA immunoprecipitation was based on a methylated RNA immunoprecipitation sequencing (MeRIP-seq) protocol for low-input samples47. One-hundred microlitres of Dynabeads Protein G beads were washed 3 times in IP buffer (150âmM NaCl, 10âmMâpH 7.5 Tris-HCl, 0.1% NP-40 substitute). Ten microlitres of Poly/Mono-ADP Ribose rabbit antibody (Cell Signaling Technologies) was added to washed beads resuspended in 500âμl IP buffer and then incubated overnight at 4â°C with end-to-end rotation. Following incubation, antibody conjugated beads were washed twice with IP buffer and then resuspended in 500âμl IP buffer with 20 μg fragmented, rRNA-depleted RNA and 5âμl Superase-In RNAse inhibitor and incubated overnight at 4â°C with end-to-end rotation. Samples were then washed twice with 1âml IP buffer, twice with 1âml low-salt wash (50âmM NaCl, 10âmMâpH 7.5 Tris-HCl, 0.1% NP-40 substitute), and twice with 1âml high-salt wash (500âmM NaCl, 10âmMâpH 7.5 Tris-HCl, 0.1% NP-40 substitute). For each wash, beads were incubated in the wash solution for 10âmin at 4â°C with end-to-end rotation. After the final wash, beads were incubated in 200âμl RLT buffer from the Qiagen RNeasy kit for 2âmin at room temperature with end-to-end rotation. Supernatant was separated from the beads using a magnetic rack, transferred to a new tube, and mixed with 200âμl of 100% ethanol. This mixture was passed through a RNeasy MiniElute spin column by centrifugation at 20,000g at 4â°C for 1âmin. Spin columns were then washed once with 500âμl RNeasy RPE buffer and once with 500âμl 80% ethanol with each spin done at 20,000g for 1âmin at 4â°C. Columns were then spun at 20,000g for 5âmin to remove residual ethanol. RNA was eluted from the column in 15âμl RNAse-free H2O with a spin at 20,000g for 5âmin at 4â°C. RNA yield and integrity was verified using a NanoDrop spectrophotometer and a Novex 6% TBE-urea gel (Invitrogen), respectively.
Pre- and post-immunoprecipitation RNA (50â100âng) was then used to make RNA-seq libraries using the NEBNext Ultra II RNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina following the manufacturerâs protocol for use with rRNA-depleted formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded RNA. Paired-end sequencing of the libraries was performed on a Singular G4 machine at the MIT BioMicroCenter. FASTQ files were then mapped to the MG1655 genome (NC_00913.2), the T4 genome (NC_000866), and the plasmid pKVS45-CmdTAC as previously described44,48.
Library preparation for RNA-seq
Cells were collected and RNA collected as described above for infected cells. rRNA was removed using a previously described ribosomal RNA subtraction method46. One-hundred nanograms of each rRNA-depleted RNA sample was then used to make RNA-seq libraries using the NEBNext Ultra II RNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina following the manufacturerâs protocol for use with purified mRNA or rRNA-depleted RNA. Paired-end sequencing of the libraries was performed on an Illumina NextSeq 5000 machine at the MIT BioMicroCenter. FASTQ files were then mapped to the MG1655 genome (NC_00913.2), the T4 genome (NC_000866), and the plasmid pKVS45-CmdTAC, as previously described44,48.
Co-immunoprecipitation and LCâMS/MS
Overnight cultures of +cmdTAC and +cmdTA/Flag-C or +cmdT-Flag/AC cells were back-diluted in 250âml LB and grown at 37â°C to an OD600 of 0.3 and then for +cmdTAC and +cmdTA/Flag-C samples infected with T4 at an MOI of 10. At 0âmin for all samples and 15âmin post-infection for +cmdTAC and +cmdTA/Flag-C cultures 64âml of sample was pelleted by centrifugation at 7,500g for 5âmin. Pellets were decanted and resuspended in 1âml of lysis buffer (25âmM Tris-HCL, 150âmM NaCl, 1âmM EDTA, 5% glycerol, 1% Triton X-100) supplemented with 1âμlâmlâ1 Ready-Lyse Lysozyme (Fischer Scientific), 1âμlâmlâ1 benzonase (Sigma), and cOmplete Protease Inhibitor Cocktail (Roche) and then flash frozen in liquid nitrogen. Samples were kept in liquid nitrogen until all timepoints were collected. Samples were subjected to two freeze-thaw cycles in liquid nitrogen to ensure complete lysis of cells. Additional lysis buffer was added to samples as needed to normalize sample concentrations by OD600. Samples were spun at 20,000g for 10âmin at 4â°C to pellet any debris. For each sample, 50âμl of Pierce Anti-DYKDDDDK magnetic agarose beads was mixed with 450âμl lysis buffer and then collected to the side of the tube using a magnetic rack. Beads were then washed twice with 500âμl lysis buffer. After the final wash, beads were mixed with 1âml of sample and incubated for 20âmin at room temperature on an end-to-end rotor. After incubation, beads were washed in wash buffer (1à PBS, 150âmM NaCl) twice and then once with MilliQ H2O.
On-bead reduction, trypsin digest, and LCâMS/MS were done by the MIT Biopolymers and Proteomics Core as previously described42. In brief, proteins were reduced for 1âh at 56â°C with 10âmM dithiothreitol (Sigma) and then alkylated for 1âh at 25â°C in the dark with 20âmM iodoacetamide (Sigma). Proteins were digested with modified trypsin (Promega) overnight in 100âmM, pH 8 ammonium bicarbonate at a 1:50 enzyme:substrate ratio. Formic acid (99.9%, Sigma) was added to stop trypsin digest. Digested peptides were desalted using Pierce Peptide Desalting Spin Columns (Thermo) then lyophilized. Peptides were separated on a PepMap RSLC C18 column (Thermo) over 90âmin by reverse phase HPLC (Thermo Ultimate 3000) before nano-electrospray with an Orbitrap Exploris 480 mass spectrometer (Thermo). Mass spectrometer run was done in data-dependent mode. Full scan parameters were resolution of 120,000 across 375â1600âm/z and maximum IT 25âms. This was followed by MS/MS for as many precursor ions in a two second cycle with a resolution of 30,000, dynamic exclusion of 20âs, and a NCE of 28. Detected peptides were mapped to MG1655, plasmid, and T4 protein sequences and the abundance of proteins were estimated by number of spectrum counts/molecular mass to normalize for protein sizes. The ratio of spectral counts between the Flag pulldowns and untagged pulldowns at each timepoint were used to generate the data in the figures with a pseudocount added to each count.
In vitro transcription and translation
In vitro transcriptionâtranslation assays were conducted using the PURExpress kit (NEB) according to the manufacturerâs protocol with a 2-h incubation at 37â°C. Each reaction was supplemented with 1âUâµlâ1 Riboguard RNase inhibitor (LGC Biosearch Technologies), with or without 1âmM NAD+ and protein eluants as indicated. When supplying mRNA as a translation template, primers were used to amplify the DHFR gene using PCR from the PURExpress control DHFR plasmid. The PCR amplicon was purified using the DNA Clean & Concentrator Kit (Zymogen). Then, mRNA was synthesized from the PCR template by incubating 300âng DNA with 200 U T7 RNA polymerase, 0.5âmM NTPs, and 5âmM DTT in a final reaction volume of 40âµl at 37â°C for 4.5âh. The resulting RNA was purified from the reaction using the RNA Clean and Concentrator Kit (Zymogen) with on-column DNase I treatment. Pure mRNA was then treated with CmdT or control mock purified protein in 1à ADPr buffer (20âmM Tris-HCl pH 8.0 and 150âmM NaCl) with 1âmM NAD+ and 1âUâµlâ1 Riboguard at 37â°C for 2âh. RNA was again purified as before, and 1âµg was supplied in the PURExpress reaction for 4âh at 37â°C. From this reaction, 2.5âµl was then denatured in Laemmli buffer and run on a 8â16% polyacrylamide gel by SDSâPAGE and stained with either Brilliant Blue R250 or Coomassie Fluor Orange (Molecular Probes) and visualized on a Bio-Rad ChemiDoc MP imager.
Protein immunoblotting
Cell cultures were grown overnight and diluted 1:200 in fresh LB containing the appropriate antibiotics. Cultures were grown at 37â°C to mid-exponential phase and then treated with T4 at an MOI of 10, or the appropriate inducers as dictated by the experiment. At various timepoints, cells were pelleted, flash frozen and subsequently resuspended in Laemmli buffer with 2.5% 2-mercaptoethanol in a volume normalized to culture turbidity (100âµl OD600â1 mlâ1). Samples were run by standard SDSâPAGE on 12% polyacrylamide gels. Transfer onto 0.2âµm PVDF membranes was done at 90âV for 40âmin for CmdAâHA, and otherwise was done at 100âV for 60âmin. Membranes were blocked in Tris-buffered saline with 0.05% Tween-20 (TBST) and 5% non-fat milk for 60âmin at room temperature and incubated with primary monoclonal antibody (1:1,000 rabbit anti-Flag or anti-HA, Cell Signaling Technologies) overnight at 4â°C. Membranes were washed with TBST and incubated with HRP-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (Invitrogen) in blocking buffer for 60âmin at room temperature. Membranes were again washed and incubated with SuperSignal West Femto Maximum Sensitivity Substrate (Thermo Scientific) before exposure on a Bio-Rad ChemiDoc MP imager. Membranes were stained with Brilliant blue R250 as a loading control. To quantify band intensity, we used the gel analysis tool in ImageJ. Pixel intensity from the antibody signal was normalized to pixel intensity of total protein stain.
For immunoblots, membrane chemiluminescence was imaged directly followed by imaging of pre-stained molecular weight markers. Images were aligned, as shown in Supplementary Fig. 1, to relate chemiluminescent bands to molecular weight markers, as shown in main figures.
Non-denaturing blots were performed by lysing cells with a buffer composed of 50% BPER-II (Thermo Scientific), 0.1âmgâmlâ1 lysozyme, cOmplete protease inhibitor (Sigma-Aldrich), 6 U DNase I (NEB) and 3âµl RNase A (NEB) in volumes normalized to OD600 of culture samples. Samples were incubated until clear at room temperature and then spun at max speed in a table-top centrifuge for 5âmin to pellet insoluble material. Native loading dye (6Ã; 600âmM Tris-HCl, 50% glycerol, 0.02% bromophenol blue) was added to samples and loaded onto a 12% polyacrylamide Mini-Protean TGX pre-cast gel (Bio-Rad, does not contain SDS). Samples were electrophoresed in 25âmM Tris, 192âmM glycine running buffer at 75âV for 90âmin. Transfer was conducted onto 0.2âµm PVDF membranes as described in this section at 100âV for 1âh at 4â°C. Blots were processed as described above. Blots shown are representative images of at least two biological replicates.
T4 genome engineering and evolution
The evolution of T4 on cmdTAC-containing cells was performed as described previously49 for four rounds, resulting in the alt.-3 C-terminal extensions in all five replicates. To generate alt.-3 mutants for further evolution experiments, T4 stock was overlayed onto strains containing Cas9 and spacers directed toward alt.-3 or a control plasmid with no spacer (ML4233 and ML4234). The number of plaques formed on the spacer-containing strain was compared to the control to determine whether there was any selection imposed by the spacer. Despite attempting eight potential spacers, no selection was observed. To mitigate this, we repeated the experiment with T4 âagt âbgt (DNA contains non-glucosylated, 5-hydroxymethyl cytosine) on an E. coli âmcrA âmcrBC background required for viability of T4 âagt âbgt. This T4 formed fewer plaques in the presence of the alt.-3 spacer, suggesting that selection for alt.-3 mutants was imposed in this condition. The alt.-3 region was amplified by PCR and Sanger sequenced from plaques that were able to form on the spacer-containing strain. Of those plaques, we isolated a strain that harboured a mutation encompassing nearly the entire open reading frame of alt.-3. The T4 âalt.-3 strain was propagated in the presence of the spacer and stored as a stock at 4â°C. Evolution of this T4 strain on cmdTAC-containing cells was conducted the same as before, for 17 rounds, without observing mutations that increased plaquing ability.
Radiolabel incorporation assays
Overnight cultures of +cmdTAC and +cmdT*AC cells were back-diluted in LBâ+â20âµgâmlâ1 chloramphenicol and grown at 37â°C to an OD600 between 0.2 and 0.3. An aliquot of each culture was collected before T4 infection at an MOI of 10 and again at each indicated timepoint (tâ=â10, 20, 30, 40âmin post-infection). Each collected sample was incubated with EasyTag EXPRESS-35S protein labelling mix (Perkin Elmer) at 23âµCiâmlâ1 for 2âmin at 37â°C. Labelling was chased with an unlabelled cysteine/methionine mixture at 5âmM and then samples precipitated in 13% w/v ice-cold TCA. Samples were pelleted by centrifugation at 16,000g for 10âmin at 4â°C, washed twice with 500âµl ice-cold acetone, and then resuspended in resuspension buffer (100âmM Tris pH 11.0, 3% w/v SDS). Samples were run on 4â20% SDSâPAGE gels (Bio-Rad), the gels incubated in Gel-Dry Drying Solution (Invitrogen) for 10âmin, and then dried on a vacuum gel dryer for 2âh at 80â°C. Dried gels were exposed to a phosphorimaging screen overnight before imaging on an Amersham Typhoon imager.
Protein purification
Five millilitres of cultures of ML4207 and ML4232 were grown overnight at 37â°C in LBâ+â0.2% glucose. The following day, 5âml of each culture was washed of glucose twice and used to inoculate 495âml of LBâ+â25âµgâmlâ1 kanamycin. After 1âh of additional growth, arabinose was added to a final concentration of 0.2%. Cultures were grown an additional 95âmin, pelleted, washed with H2O, again pelleted, and flash frozen in liquid N2. The following day, cell pellets were resuspended in 4âml lysis buffer (50âmM Tris pH 7.5, 500âmM NaCl, 0.05% Tween-20, EDTA-free protease inhibitor, 0.5âmM PMSF, 0.5âmgâmlâ1 lysozyme, 5âmM imidazole, and 5% glycerol) on ice. Cells were then lysed by sonication in a Bioruptor 300 for two rounds of 10 cycles each, high setting, 30âs on/30âs off. One millilitre of Ni-NTA agarose resin (Qiagen, 0.5âml bed volume) was equilibrated in lysis buffer. Cell lysate was clarified by centrifugation then incubated with the Ni resin for 1âh at 4â°C with gentle rocking. The following steps were conducted at 4â°C. The resin was then passed through a 10âml chromatography column and then washed 5à with 2.5âml of wash buffer (same as lysis buffer but without lysozyme, and imidazole at 20âmM). Protein was then eluted 5à with 2.5âml elution buffer (wash buffer with imidazole concentration at 300âmM). Eluted proteins were buffer-exchanged into Tris pH 7.4 using Micro Bio-Spin chromatography columns (Bio-Rad) and concentrated using Amicon Ultra 0.5âml centrifugal filters with a 3-kDa cutoff.
In vitro ADP-ribosylation by CmdT
A typical reaction was assembled on ice as follows. To a buffer composed of 20âmM Tris-HCl pH 8.0 and 150âmM NaCl, we added 1âUâµlâ1 Riboguard RNase inhibitor, 1âmM NAD+ (NEB), 4âµg of DNA or RNA oligonucleotide, and protein at the concentrations indicated. The reactions were then incubated in a thermocycler at 37â°C. To stop the reaction, an equal volume of 2à 6âM urea sample buffer (Novex) was added. RNA was denatured at 95â°C for 10âmin and then immediately placed on ice. One microgram of RNA samples were then subject to electrophoresis in 15% polyacrylamide TBE-urea gels at 180âV for 75âmin. Gels were stained both with SYBR Gold and with a concentrated solution of 0.2% methylene blue in 0.1à TBE buffer for 15âmin, de-stained with several changes of H2O and imaged.
In vitro ADP ribose RNA pulldown
Twenty micrograms of total RNA were ADP-ribosylated with CmdT as described above with 0.25âmM 6-Biotin-17-NAD+ (Cayman Chemical) for 4âh at 37â°C and then continued at 4â°C overnight. Two control reactions were set up identically except with mock purified protein, or with standard NAD+ in place of 6-Biotin-17-NAD+. Ten micrograms of each reaction were kept at â80â°C as the pre-pulldown sample. The remaining 10âµg were incubated with streptavidin conjugated superparamagnetic beads (Dynabeads MyOne Streptavidin C1) following the manufacturerâs protocol. RNA was stripped from the beads by addition of 0.5âml Trizol and incubation at 25â°C for 15âmin on a thermomixer at 1,000ârpm. Beads were then precipitated with a magnet and 100âµl of chloroform were added. The phases were separated by centrifugation at 14,000g for 15âmin. Finally, the aqueous phase was purified using the RNA Clean and Concentrate Kit (Zymogen). Pre- and post-pulldown samples were electrophoresed on a 6% TBE-urea gel for 45âmin, stained with SYBR Gold and imaged. The samples from pre- and post-pulldown reactions containing 6-Biotin-17-NAD+ and CmdT were subject to RNA-seq as described in this section, but without rRNA depletion.
HPLC analysis of ribonucleosides
Ten micrograms each of no-U and no-C RNA oligonucleotides (Fig. 4d) were subjected to ADP-ribosylation as described above. Controls were included in which purified CmdT was replaced by a mock purification, or in which NAD+ was omitted. Next, samples were split and treated with either 100 U Nuclease P1 (NEB) and 10 U antarctic phosphatase, or, the same with the addition of 1 U Phosphodiesterase I from Crotalus adamanteus venom (SVPD, Millipore Sigma). Reactions were incubated in digest buffer (25âmM Tris-HCl pH 7.6, 50âmM NaCl2, 1âmM ZnCl2, and 10âmM MgCl2) at 37â°C for 3.5âh in a total volume of 110âµl. One-hundred microlitres of digested and dephosphorylated nucleosides (10âµg) were injected onto a Vydac C18 4.6 Ã250âmm reverse phase silica column (218TP54) equilibrated with 90% buffer A (0.1âM triethylammonium acetate (TEAA), pH 7.0)/10% buffer B (0.1âM TEAA, 20% acetonitrile, pH 7.0). HPLC was run with a mobile phase gradient composed of buffer A and B, 10â60% B from 1â21âmin and 60â97% B from 21â26âmin at a flow rate of 1âmlâminâ1. Analytes were measured at A254. On a replicate run, samples without SVPD treatment were collected as fractions and relevant fractions were lyophilized. The samples were then resuspended in digest buffer, and again incubated for 3.5âh with 10âU antarctic phosphatase and 1âU SVPD and analysed by HPLC as described above.
Mass spectrometry of modified nucleosides
Fractions collected from HPLC analysis were dried in a speed-vac and resuspended in 200âµl of 50% acetonitrile in 0.1% formic acid. The fractions, or a buffer blank, were directly infused by syringe pump into a Thermo Q Exactive with an API source and electrospray ionization probe at a flow rate of 5âµlâminâ1. The instrument was operated in positive ion mode. MS/MS was conducted at collision energies of both 25 and 40 CE. Instrument parameters were as follows: spray voltage, 3.8âkV; capillary tube temperature, 280â°C; sheath gas, 20; auxiliary gas, 5; sweep gas, 5.
Bioinformatic analyses
The CmdT sequence logo was generated from the CmdT hmm file from DefenseFinder50 using skylign.org.
Hidden Markov model profiles of CmdT and CmdC were downloaded from DefenseFinder50 and searched against the RefSeq non-redundant protein database using hmmscan and default parameters. Protein hits were then identified in all available RefSeq bacterial genomes and CmdTAC was called if both CmdT and CmdC were present within two proteins of each other in the genome. CmdA was not included in calling as it both has higher sequence variability and is often unannotated in clearly homologous systems. All datasets were downloaded in July 2023. The complete taxonomic lineage of RefSeq genomes was created and filtered to include bacteria of current interest (genera with greater than 1,000 sequenced genomes). A taxonomic relationship of these genera was produced with NCBI Common Tree, and presence/absence was recorded from the taxonomic profiles of the CmdT/C hmmscan.
Structural predictions
Protein homology was assessed using HHpred51. Predictions of the structures of individual components and CmdTAC as a complex were done using AlphaFold252 with the multimer module and default parameters on the reduced database with 1 prediction generated per model. Structural homology searches based on the AlphaFold2-predicted structures of CmdT and CmdC were done using Foldseek53 and the top hit for each search used for subsequent analyses. Electrostatics modelling was done using the coulombic function in ChimeraX. All predicted structure visualization was done using ChimeraX.
RNA-seq and RIP-seq read mapping
FASTQ files for each sample were trimmed using cutadapt54 (version 1.15) and then mapped to the E. coli MG1655 genome (NC_00913.2), the T4 genome (NC_000866), and the plasmid pKVS45-CmdTAC using bowtie255 (version 2.3.4.1) with the following arguments: -D 20, -I 40, -X 300, -R 3, -N 0, -L 20, -i S,1,0.50. Sam files generated from bowtie2 mapping were then converted to bam files using samtools56 (version 1.7) and then further converted to numpy arrays using the genomearray3 python library57 for use in downstream analyses. For in vivo RIPâseq analyses only highly expressed transcripts as determined by transcripts with an RNA TPM for both replicates greater than or equal to the minimum mean TPM of any T4 transcript were used. For statistical comparisons of TPM ratios between RNA types a Welchâs t-test was used.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.