Conceição, P., Kovacevic, M. & Mukhopadhyay, T. in Measuring Human Capital (ed. Barbara Fraumeni) 83–115 (Academic Press, 2021).
Raudsepp-Hearne, C. et al. Untangling the environmentalist’s paradox: why is human well-being increasing as ecosystem services degrade? Bioscience 60, 576–589 (2010).
Marcantonio, R., Javeline, D., Field, S. & Fuentes, A. Global distribution and coincidence of pollution, climate impacts, and health risk in the Anthropocene. PLoS ONE 16, e0254060 (2021).
Díaz, S. et al. Pervasive human-driven decline of life on Earth points to the need for transformative change. Science 366, eaax3100 (2019). This paper presents a synthesis of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) Global Assessment (IPBES 2019) formatted for a scientific audience.
Lawrence, M. et al. Global polycrisis: the causal mechanisms of crisis entanglement. Glob. Sustain. 7, e6 (2024).
Ellis, E. C. Land use and ecological change: a 12,000-year history. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 46, 1–33 (2021).
Human Development Report 2020: The Next Frontier: Human Development and the Anthropocene (UNDP, 2020). This Human Development Report connects human agency and empowerment to efforts to shape a planet where people and nature thrive together.
Human Development Report 2023–24: Breaking the Gridlock: Reimagining Cooperation in a Polarized World (UNDP, 2024).
Human Development Report 1990: Concept and Measurement of Human Development (UNDP, 1990).
Stewart, F. The human development approach: an overview. Oxf. Dev. Stud. 47, 135–153 (2019).
Sen, A. A decade of human development. J. Hum. Dev. 1, 17–23 (2000).
Klugman, J., Rodríguez, F. & Choi, H.-J. The HDI 2010: new controversies, old critiques. J. Econ. Inequal. 9, 249–288 (2011).
Biermann, F. in Trajectories in Environmental Politics (eds Hayes, G. et al.) 58–77 (Routledge, 2022).
Reisinger, A., Cowie, A. L., Geden, O. & Al Khourdajie, A. Science-based targets miss the mark. Commun. Earth Environ. 5, 383 (2024).
Cointe, B. & Guillemot, H. A history of the 1.5 °C target. WIREs Clim. Change 14, e824 (2023).
Fairhead, J., Leach, M. & Scoones, I. Green grabbing: a new appropriation of nature. The J. Peasant Stud. 39, 237–261 (2012).
Whyte, K. in Routledge Handbook of Critical Indigenous Studies (eds Hokowhitu, B. et al.) 52–64 (Routledge, 2020). This chapter hioghlights the need to build kin relationships to prevent further injustices against Indigenous peoples in responding to climate change.
Scheidel, A. et al. Global impacts of extractive and industrial development projects on Indigenous peoples’ lifeways, lands, and rights. Sci. Adv. 9, eade9557 (2023).
Bain, P. G., Hornsey, M. J., Bongiorno, R. & Jeffries, C. Promoting pro-environmental action in climate change deniers. Nat. Clim. Change 2, 600–603 (2012).
Hickman, C. et al. Climate anxiety in children and young people and their beliefs about government responses to climate change: a global survey. Lancet Planet. Health 5, e863–e873 (2021).
Williamson, K. A. & Thulin, E. Leveraging emotion-behavior pathways to support environmental behavior change. Ecol. Soc. 27, 27 (2022).
Hornsey, M. J. & Fielding, K. S. Understanding (and reducing) inaction on climate change. Soc. Issues Policy Rev. 14, 3–35 (2020).
Biermann, F. & Kim, R. E. The boundaries of the Planetary Boundary Framework: a critical appraisal of approaches to define a “safe operating space” for humanity. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 45, 497–521 (2020).
Patterson, J. et al. The political effects of emergency frames in sustainability. Nat. Sustain. 4, 841–850 (2021).
Whyte, K. Too late for indigenous climate justice: ecological and relational tipping points. WIREs Clim. Change 11, e603 (2020).
McHugh, L. H., Lemos, M. C. & Morrison, T. H. Risk? Crisis? Emergency? Implications of the new climate emergency framing for governance and policy. WIREs Clim. Change 12, e736 (2021).
Bennett, E. M. et al. Bright spots: seeds of a good Anthropocene. Front. Ecol. Environ. 14, 441–448 (2016).
Barrett, S. Climate treaties and approaching catastrophes. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 66, 235–250 (2013).
Chinn, S., Hart, P. S. & Soroka, S. Politicization and polarization in climate change news content, 1985–2017. Sci. Commun. 42, 112–129 (2020).
Hornung, J. Social identities in climate action. Climate Action 1, 4 (2022).
Barfuss, W., Donges, J. F., Vasconcelos, V. V., Kurths, J. & Levin, S. A. Caring for the future can turn tragedy into comedy for long-term collective action under risk of collapse. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 12915–12922 (2020).
Adger, W. N., Barnett, J., Heath, S. & Jarillo, S. Climate change affects multiple dimensions of well-being through impacts, information and policy responses. Nat. Hum. Behav. 6, 1465–1473 (2022).
Bietti, L. M., Tilston, O. & Bangerter, A. Storytelling as adaptive collective sensemaking. Top. Cogn. Sci. 11, 710–732 (2019).
Solnit, R. & Young-Lutunatabua, T. Not Too Late: Changing the Climate Story from Despair to Possibility (Haymarket Books, 2023).
Shi, J., Visschers, V. H. M. & Siegrist, M. Public perception of climate change: the importance of knowledge and cultural worldviews. Risk Anal. 35, 2183–2201 (2015).
Pascual, U. et al. Diverse values of nature for sustainability. Nature 620, 813–823 (2023). This article presents a synthesis on nature values, their plurality and the methods to assess them, based on the IPBES values assessment.
Vlasceanu, M. et al. Addressing climate change with behavioral science: A global intervention tournament in 63 countries. Sci. Adv. 10, eadj5778 (2024).
Shrum, T. R. The salience of future impacts and the willingness to pay for climate change mitigation: an experiment in intergenerational framing. Clim. Change 165, 18 (2021).
Lima, P. A. B. et al. More than moral motivations: the moderating role of human capabilities on the relationship between personal norms and pro-environmental behavior. J. Clean. Prod. 425, 139034 (2023).
McAfee, D., Doubleday, Z. A., Geiger, N. & Connell, S. D. Everyone loves a success story: optimism inspires conservation engagement. Bioscience 69, 274–281 (2019).
Flusberg, S. J., Holmes, K. J., Thibodeau, P. H., Nabi, R. L. & Matlock, T. The psychology of framing: how everyday language shapes the way we think, feel, and act. Psychol. Sci. Publ. Int. 25, 105–161 (2024).
Bjork-James, C., Checker, M. & Edelman, M. Transnational social movements: environmentalist, Indigenous, and agrarian visions for planetary futures. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 47, 583–608 (2022).
Jayasuriya, U. & Watene, K. Just transitions as relationship-building. J. Glob. Ethics 20, 171–178 (2024).
Grix, M. & Watene, K. Communities and climate change: why practices and practitioners matter. Ethics Int. Aff. 36, 215–230 (2022).
Morris, J. D. K. & Ruru, J. Giving voice to rivers: legal personality as a vehicle for recognising Indigenous peoples’ relationships to water? Aust. Indig. Law Rev. 14, 49–62 (2010).
Yap, M. & Yu, E. in Routledge Handbook of Indigenous Wellbeing (eds Fleming, C. & Manning M.) 261–280 (Routledge, 2019).
Watene, K. in Intercultural Philosophy and Environmental Justice Between Generations: Indigenous, African, Asian, and Western Perspectives (eds Abe, H., Fritsch, M. & Wenning, M.) 17–32 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2024).
Fisk, J. J. et al. Cultivating sovereignty in parks and protected areas: Sowing the seeds of restorative and transformative justice through the #LANDBACK movement. Parks Stewardship Forum https://doi.org/10.5070/p537354734 (2021).
Sen, A. Commodities and Capabilities (North-Holland, 1985).
Sen, A. Development as Freedom (Oxford Univ. Press, 1999).
New Threats To Human Security In The Anthropocene: Demanding Greater Solidarity (UNDP, 2022).
Sen, A. The ends and means of sustainability. J. Hum. Dev. Cap. 14, 6–20 (2013). This paper argues for a freedom and capability-based understanding of sustainability, thereby moving beyond mere basic needs.
Ellis, E. C. Ecology in an anthropogenic biosphere. Ecol. Monogr. 85, 287–331 (2015).
Ellis, E. C. The Anthropocene condition: evolving through social-ecological transformations. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 379, 20220255 (2024).
Hill, K., Barton, M. & Hurtado, A. M. The emergence of human uniqueness: characters underlying behavioral modernity. Evol. Anthropol. 18, 187–200 (2009).
Moran, E. F. Human Adaptability: An Introduction to Ecological Anthropology (Routledge, 2022).
Henrich, J. & Muthukrishna, M. The origins and psychology of human cooperation. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 72, 207–240 (2021).
Henrich, J. et al. A cultural species and its cognitive phenotypes: implications for philosophy. Rev. Phil. Psychol. 14, 349–386 (2023).
Carballo, D. M. & Feinman, G. M. Cooperation, collective action, and the archeology of large-scale societies. Evol. Anthropol. 25, 288–296 (2016).
Bliege Bird, R. & Nimmo, D. Restore the lost ecological functions of people. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 1050–1052 (2018). This piece provides an anthropological perspective on human roles in shaping and sustaining thriving ecosystems.
Brondízio, E. S. et al. Locally based, regionally manifested, and globally relevant: Indigenous and local knowledge, values, and practices for nature. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 46, 481–509 (2021). This paper synthesizes Indigenous and local knowledges, values, and practices that sustain nature.
Leach, M., Stirling, A. C. & Scoones, I. Dynamic Sustainabilities: Technology, Environment, Social Justice (Taylor & Francis, 2010).
Leach, M. et al. Equity and sustainability in the Anthropocene: a social–ecological systems perspective on their intertwined futures. Glob. Sustain. 1, e13 (2018).
Arponen, V. P. J., Ohlrau, R. & Kerig, T. The capability approach and archaeological interpretation of transformations: on the role of philosophy for archaeology. Open Archaeol. https://doi.org/10.1515/opar-2024-0013 (2024).
Ostrom, E., Burger, J., Field, C. B., Norgaard, R. B. & Policansky, D. Revisiting the commons: local lessons, global challenges. Science 284, 278–282 (1999).
DeFries, R. et al. Planetary opportunities: a social contract for global change science to contribute to a sustainable future. Bioscience 62, 603–606 (2012).
Lafond, F. et al. How well do experience curves predict technological progress? A method for making distributional forecasts. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 128, 104–117 (2018).
Coccia, M. & Wang, L. Evolution and convergence of the patterns of international scientific collaboration. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 2057–2061 (2016).
Ritchie, H. Not the End of the World: How We Can Be the First Generation to Build a Sustainable Planet (Little, Brown, 2024). This book reviews recent progress in addressing global challenges towards a future where people and nature thrive together.
Easterly, W. Institutions: top down or bottom up? Am. Econ. Rev. 98, 95–99 (2008).
Fouquet, R. Historical energy transitions: speed, prices and system transformation. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 22, 7–12 (2016).
Le Fanu, J. The Rise And Fall Of Modern Medicine (Little, Brown, 2011).
Kruk, M. E. et al. High-quality health systems in the Sustainable Development Goals era: time for a revolution. Lancet Glob. Health 6, e1196–e1252 (2018).
Hafner‐Burton, E. M. & Tsutsui, K. Human rights in a globalizing world: the paradox of empty promises. Am. J. Sociol. 110, 1373–1411 (2005).
Garcés-Velástegui, P. Varieties of development: on the plurality of political economies and how to harness it. J. Int. Dev. 36, 268–287 (2024).
Schelling, T. C. Micromotives and Macrobehavior (W. W. Norton, 1978).
Constantino, S. M. et al. Scaling up change: a critical review and practical guide to harnessing social norms for climate action. Psychol. Sci. Publ. Int. 23, 50–97 (2022).
Boyd, R. & Richerson, P. J. Large-scale cooperation in small-scale foraging societies. Evol. Anthropol. 31, 175–198 (2022).
Wilson, D. S., Hayes, S. C., Biglan, A. & Embry, D. D. Evolving the future: toward a science of intentional change. Behav. Brain Sci. 37, 395–416 (2014).
Benati, G. & Guerriero, C. Climate change and state evolution. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2020893118 (2021).
Butzer, K. W. Collapse, environment, and society. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 3632–3639 (2012).
Strunz, S., Marselle, M. & Schröter, M. Leaving the “sustainability or collapse” narrative behind. Sustain. Sci. 14, 1717–1728 (2019).
Haldon, J., Eisenberg, M., Mordechai, L., Izdebski, A. & White, S. Lessons from the past, policies for the future: resilience and sustainability in past crises. Environ. Syst. Decis. 40, 287–297 (2020).
Tainter, J. A. Archaeology of overshoot and collapse. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 35, 59–74 (2006).
Ostrom, E., Janssen, M. A. & Anderies, J. M. Going beyond panaceas. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 15176–15178 (2007).
Tong, S., Samet, J. M., Steffen, W., Kinney, P. L. & Frumkin, H. Solidarity for the Anthropocene. Environ. Res. 235, 116716 (2023).
Sen, A. The Idea of Justice (Harvard Univ. Press, 2009).
Territories of Life: 2021 Report (ICCA Consortium, 2021).
Garnett, S. T. et al. A spatial overview of the global importance of Indigenous lands for conservation. Nat. Sust. 1, 369–374 (2018).
Fletcher, M.-S., Hamilton, R., Dressler, W. & Palmer, L. Indigenous knowledge and the shackles of wilderness. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2022218118 (2021).
Ellis, E. C. et al. People have shaped most of terrestrial nature for at least 12,000 years. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2023483118 (2021).
Gordon, J. D., Fagan, B., Milner, N. & Thomas, C. D. Floristic diversity and its relationships with human land use varied regionally during the Holocene. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 8, 1459–1471 (2024).
Levis, C. et al. Contributions of human cultures to biodiversity and ecosystem conservation. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 8, 866–879 (2024).
Sanderson, E. W., Walston, J. & Robinson, J. G. From bottleneck to breakthrough: urbanization and the future of biodiversity conservation. Bioscience 68, 412–426 (2018).
Hickel, J. The contradiction of the sustainable development goals: Growth versus ecology on a finite planet. Sustain. Dev. 27, 873–884 (2019).
Chen, D. & Pensini, P. The development of the zero-sum beliefs between nature and humanity scale. J. Environ. Psychol. 94, 102247 (2024).
Davidai, S. & Tepper, S. J. The psychology of zero-sum beliefs. Nat. Rev. Psychol. 2, 472–482 (2023).
Sanyé-Mengual, E., Secchi, M., Corrado, S., Beylot, A. & Sala, S. Assessing the decoupling of economic growth from environmental impacts in the European Union: a consumption-based approach. J. Clean. Prod. 236, 117535 (2019).
Hussain, A. & Dey, S. Revisiting environmental Kuznets curve with HDI: new evidence from cross-country panel data. J. Environ. Econ. Policy 10, 324–342 (2021).
Andre, P., Boneva, T., Chopra, F. & Falk, A. Globally representative evidence on the actual and perceived support for climate action. Nat. Clim. Change 14, 253–259 (2024).
Hausfather, Z. & Moore, F. C. Net-zero commitments could limit warming to below 2 °C. Nature 604, 247–248 (2022).
Givens, J. E., Huang, X. & Jorgenson, A. K. Ecologically unequal exchange: a theory of global environmental injustice. Sociol. Compass 13, e12693 (2019).
Dorninger, C. et al. Global patterns of ecologically unequal exchange: Implications for sustainability in the 21st century. Ecol. Econ. 179, 106824 (2021).
Barnes, P. W. et al. Ozone depletion, ultraviolet radiation, climate change and prospects for a sustainable future. Nat. Sustain. 2, 569–579 (2019).
Grace, M. K. et al. Testing a global standard for quantifying species recovery and assessing conservation impact. Conserv. Biol. 35, 1833–1849 (2021).
Langhammer, P. F. et al. The positive impact of conservation action. Science 384, 453–458 (2024).
Schwarzenbach, R. P., Egli, T., Hofstetter, T. B., von Gunten, U. & Wehrli, B. Global water pollution and human health. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 35, 109–136 (2010).
Fowler, D. et al. A chronology of global air quality. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 378, 20190314 (2020).
IPCC. Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change Summary for Policymakers (eds Shukla, P. R. et al.) (IPCC, 2022).
IPBES. Global Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES secretariat, 2019).
Way, R., Ives, M. C., Mealy, P. & Farmer, J. D. Empirically grounded technology forecasts and the energy transition. Joule 6, 2057–2082 (2022).
Stoddard, I. et al. Three decades of climate mitigation: Why haven’t we bent the global emissions curve? Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 46, 653–689 (2021).
Caldeira, K. & Wickett, M. E. Oceanography: anthropogenic carbon and ocean pH. Nature 425, 365–365 (2003).
MacLeod, M., Arp, H. P. H., Tekman, M. B. & Jahnke, A. The global threat from plastic pollution. Science 373, 61–65 (2021).
Wang, F. et al. Emerging contaminants: a one health perspective. Innovation https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xinn.2024.100612 (2024).
Salomon, A. K. et al. Disrupting and diversifying the values, voices and governance principles that shape biodiversity science and management. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 378, 20220196 (2023).
Kimmerer, R. W. Braiding Sweetgrass: Indigenous Wisdom, Scientific Knowledge and the Teachings of Plants (Milkweed Editions, 2013).
Watene, K. & Yap, M. Culture and sustainable development: indigenous contributions. J. Glob. Ethics 11, 51–55 (2015). This paper demonstrates how the contributions of Indigenous philosophies and practices shape how the Sustainable Development Goals are grounded, designed and implemented.
Gainsburg, I., Roy, S. & Cunningham, J. L. An examination of how six reasons for valuing nature are endorsed and associated with pro-environmental behavior across 12 countries. Sci. Rep. 13, 8484 (2023).
Clayton, S. in The Virtues of Sustainability (ed. Kawall, J.) 3–26 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2021).
Nowak-Olejnik, A., Schirpke, U. & Tappeiner, U. A systematic review on subjective well-being benefits associated with cultural ecosystem services. Ecosyst. Serv. 57, 101467 (2022).
Himes, A. et al. Why nature matters: a systematic review of intrinsic, instrumental, and relational values. Bioscience 74, 25–43 (2023). This is a comprehensive review of intrinsic, instrumental and relational values of nature expressed in the sustainability literature.
Mayer, F. S. & Frantz, C. M. The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of individuals’ feeling in community with nature. J. Environ. Psychol. 24, 503–515 (2004).
Woroniecki, S. et al. Nature unsettled: how knowledge and power shape ‘nature-based’ approaches to societal challenges. Global Environ. Change 65, 102132 (2020).
Richardson, M., Hamlin, I., Elliott, L. R. & White, M. P. Country-level factors in a failing relationship with nature: nature connectedness as a key metric for a sustainable future. Ambio 51, 2201–2213 (2022).
Clayton, S. D. in The Oxford Handbook of Environmental and Conservation Psychology (ed. Clayton, S. D.) 164–180 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2012).
Pritchard, A., Richardson, M., Sheffield, D. & McEwan, K. The relationship between nature connectedness and eudaimonic well-being: a meta-analysis. J. Happiness Stud. 21, 1145–1167 (2020).
Mackay, C. M. L. & Schmitt, M. T. Do people who feel connected to nature do more to protect it? A meta-analysis. J. Environ. Psychol. 65, 101323 (2019).
Ives, C. D. et al. Human–nature connection: a multidisciplinary review. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 26–27, 106–113 (2017).
Capaldi, C. A., Dopko, R. L. & Zelenski, J. M. The relationship between nature connectedness and happiness: a meta-analysis. Front. Psychol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00976 (2014).
Hartig, T., Mitchell, R., de Vries, S. & Frumkin, H. Nature and health. Annu. Rev. Public Health 35, 207–228 (2014).
Soto-Navarro, C. A. et al. Towards a multidimensional biodiversity index for national application. Nat. Sustain. 4, 933–942 (2021).
Jax, K. et al. Caring for nature matters: a relational approach for understanding nature’s contributions to human well-being. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 35, 22–29 (2018).
Jimenez, M. P. et al. Associations between nature exposure and health: a review of the evidence. Int. J. Env. Res. Public Health 18, 4790 (2021).
Díaz, S. et al. Assessing nature’s contributions to people. Science 359, 270–272 (2018). This paper introduces the concept of nature’s contributions to people.
Pedersen, S., Stevis, D. & Kalfagianni, A. What is planetary justice. Environ. Polit. 33, 1137–1145 (2024).
Betley, E. C. et al. Assessing human well-being constructs with environmental and equity aspects: a review of the landscape. People Nat. 5, 1756–1773 (2023).
Leach, M. & Fairhead, J. Naturekind: Language, Culture and Power Beyond the Human (Princeton Univ. Press, 2025).
Pustorino, P. in Introduction to International Human Rights Law 223–233 (T.M.C. Asser Press, 2023).
Boyd, D. R. The Right to Healthy Environment: User Guide (United Nations Human Rights, 2024).
Pereira, L. M. et al. Developing multiscale and integrative nature–people scenarios using the Nature Futures Framework. People Nat. 2, 1172–1195 (2020). This article presents the Nature Futures Framework, a flexible tool to support the development of scenarios and models of desirable futures.
Marris, E. Wild Souls: Freedom and Flourishing in the Non-Human World (Bloomsbury, 2021).
Haraway, D. Anthropocene, Capitalocene, Plantationocene, Chthulucene: making kin. Env. Hum. 6, 159–165 (2015).
Van Lange, P. A. M. A broader mind: concern with other humans, equality, and animals. Curr. Opin. Behav. Sci. 42, 109–113 (2021).
Nussbaum, M. C. Creating Capabilities: The Human Development Approach (Harvard Univ. Press, 2011).
Balogun, K., Weru, K. & Shen, X. “Freedom from want”: a critical reflection in the face of the Anthropocene. J. Hum. Dev. Capab. 24, 274–283 (2023).
Measuring What Matters: Australia’s First Wellbeing Framework (Australian Government, 2023).
The Living Standards Framework 2021 (New Zealand Treasury, 2021).
Soga, M. & Gaston, K. J. Global synthesis reveals heterogeneous changes in connection of humans to nature. One Earth 6, 131–138 (2023).
Truong, M.-X. A. & Clayton, S. Technologically transformed experiences of nature: a challenge for environmental conservation. Biol. Conserv. 244, 108532 (2020).
Reed, G. et al. There is no word for ‘nature’ in our language: rethinking nature-based solutions from the perspective of Indigenous peoples located in Canada. Clim. Change 177, 32 (2024).
Soga, M. & Gaston, K. J. Do people who experience more nature act more to protect it? A meta-analysis. Biol. Conserv. 289, 110417 (2024).
Beery, T. et al. Disconnection from nature: expanding our understanding of human–nature relations. People Nat. 5, 470–488 (2023).
Kunming–Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (Convention on Biological Diversity, 2022).
Mace, G. M. Whose conservation? Science 345, 1558–1560 (2014). This article recounts a recent history of nature perceptions and derived goals of nature conservation.
Zhang, J. & Fu, B. Eco-civilization: a complementary pathway rooted in theory and practice for global sustainable development. Ambio 52, 1882–1894 (2023).
Díaz, S. et al. Set ambitious goals for biodiversity and sustainability. Science 370, 411–413 (2020).
Milner-Gulland, E. J. Don’t dilute the term nature positive. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 6, 1243–1244 (2022).
Obura, D. O. et al. Achieving a nature- and people-positive future. One Earth 6, 105–117 (2023). This perspective argues for bending the curve of biodiversity decline by integrating actions on nature with the economic and societal determinants of biodiversity trends.
Fox, M.-J. V. & Erickson, J. D. Design and meaning of the genuine progress indicator: A statistical analysis of the U.S. fifty-state model. Ecol. Econ. 167, 106441 (2020).
Obura, D. O. et al. Integrate biodiversity targets from local to global levels. Science 373, 746–748 (2021).
Stirling, A. “Opening up” and “closing down”: power, participation, and pluralism in the social appraisal of technology. Sci. Technol. Human Values 33, 262–294 (2008).
Chilvers, J. & Kearnes, M. (eds) Remaking Participation 314 (Routledge, 2016). This book assesses recent efforts to facilitate public engagement in science, innovation and environmental issues, drawing lessons for the future.
Rametsteiner, E., Pülzl, H., Alkan-Olsson, J. & Frederiksen, P. Sustainability indicator development—science or political negotiation. Ecol. Indic. 11, 61–70 (2011). This piece evaluates sustainability indicators and contends that their development is both a process of scientific knowledge and political norm creation.
Turnhout, E., Hisschemöller, M. & Eijsackers, H. Ecological indicators: between the two fires of science and policy. Ecol. Indic. 7, 215–228 (2007).
Nowotny, H., Scott, P. B. & Gibbons, M. T. Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty (Wiley, 2001). This book examines the social contract between science and society and proposes that socially robust knowledge is a pre-condition for scientific progress.
Waldmüller, J. M., Yap, M. & Watene, K. Remaking the Sustainable Development Goals: relational Indigenous epistemologies. Policy Soc. 41, 471–485 (2022).
Hogan, M. J. et al. Consulting with citizens in the design of wellbeing measures and policies: lessons from a systems science application. Soc. Indic. Res. 123, 857–877 (2015).
Block, S. et al. 2024 Environmental Performance Index (Yale Center for Environmental Law and Policy, 2024).
Bertram, C. et al. Feasibility of peak temperature targets in light of institutional constraints. Nat. Clim. Change 14, 954–960 (2024).
UNEP-WCMC. The World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA). Protected Planet www.protectedplanet.net (2025).
Palomo, I. et al. Incorporating the social–ecological approach in Protected Areas in the Anthropocene. Bioscience 64, 181–191 (2014).
Percent of Country Held by Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities (LandMark, 2024); https://landmarkmap.org/data-methods/national-level-data-sources.
Garibaldi, L. A. et al. Working landscapes need at least 20% native habitat. Conserv. Lett. 14, e12773 (2021).
Mohamed, A. et al. Securing nature’s contributions to people requires at least 20%–25% (semi-)natural habitat in human-modified landscapes. One Earth 7, 59–71 (2024).
Freire-González, J., Padilla Rosa, E. & Raymond, J. L. World economies’ progress in decoupling from CO2 emissions. Sci. Rep. 14, 20480 (2024).
Erb, K.-H., Matej, S., Haberl, H. & Gingrich, S. Sustainable land systems in the Anthropocene: navigating the global land squeeze. One Earth 7, 1170–1186 (2024).
Poore, J. & Nemecek, T. Reducing food’s environmental impacts through producers and consumers. Science 360, 987–992 (2018).
Environmental Rule of Law: Tracking Progress and Charting Future Directions (United Nations Environment Programme, 2023).
Meyfroidt, P. et al. Ten facts about land systems for sustainability. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2109217118 (2022).
Soga, M. & Gaston, K. J. Cross-country variation in people’s connection to nature. One Earth 8, 101194 (2025). This article presents a recent international assessment of individual relationships with nature.
Nisbet, E. K., Zelenski, J. M. & Murphy, S. A. Happiness is in our nature: exploring nature relatedness as a contributor to subjective well-being. J. Happiness Stud. 12, 303–322 (2011).
Ma, D. et al. Global expansion of human–wildlife overlap in the 21st century. Sci. Adv. 10, eadp7706 (2024).
Li, B. V., Wu, S., Pimm, S. L. & Cui, J. The synergy between protected area effectiveness and economic growth. Curr. Biol. 34, 2907–2920.e5 (2024).
Smith, C. S. et al. Beyond despair: leveraging ecosystem restoration for psychosocial resilience. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 122, e2307082121 (2025). This perspective argues for ecosystem restoration as a contributor to community and psychosocial well-being based on transforming human–nature relationships.
Lenzen, M. et al. International trade drives biodiversity threats in developing nations. Nature 486, 109 (2012).
Anderson, E. P. et al. Understanding rivers and their social relations: a critical step to advance environmental water management. WIREs Water 6, e1381 (2019).
Best, J. Anthropogenic stresses on the world’s big rivers. Nat. Geosci. 12, 7–21 (2019).
Oviedo-Vargas, D. et al. Advancing freshwater science with sensor data collected by community scientists. Front. Ecol. Environ. 22, e2748 (2024).
Pörtner, H.-O. et al. Overcoming the coupled climate and biodiversity crises and their societal impacts. Science 380, eabl4881 (2023).
