Rossi, M. et al. Adaptive introgression of a visual preference gene. Science 383, 1368–1373 (2024).
Fontsere, C., de Manuel, M., Marques-Bonet, T. & Kuhlwilm, M. Admixture in mammals and how to understand its functional implications. Bioessays 41, e1900123 (2019).
Fontaine, M. C. et al. Extensive introgression in a malaria vector species complex revealed by phylogenomics. Science 347, 1258524 (2015).
Jones, M. R. et al. Adaptive introgression underlies polymorphic seasonal camouflage in snowshoe hares. Science 360, 1355–1358 (2018).
Hibbins, M. & Hahn, M. Distinguishing between histories of speciation and introgression using genomic data. Bull. Soc. Syst. Biol. https://doi.org/10.18061/bssb.v3i1.9227 (2024).
Schumer, M. et al. Natural selection interacts with recombination to shape the evolution of hybrid genomes. Science 360, 656–660 (2018).
Edelman, N. B. & Mallet, J. Prevalence and adaptive impact of introgression. Annu. Rev. Genet. 55, 265–283 (2021).
Harrison, R. G. & Larson, E. L. Hybridization, introgression, and the nature of species boundaries. J. Hered. 105, 795–809 (2014).
Mayr, E. Animal Species and Evolution (Harvard Univ. Press, 1963).
Bravo, G. A. et al. Embracing heterogeneity: coalescing the Tree of Life and the future of phylogenomics. PeerJ 7, e6399 (2019).
Li, G., Figueiró, H. V., Eizirik, E. & Murphy, W. J. Recombination-aware phylogenomics reveals the structured genomic landscape of hybridizing cat species. Mol. Biol. Evol. 36, 2111–2126 (2019).
Foley, N. M. et al. Karyotypic stasis and swarming influenced the evolution of viral tolerance in a species-rich bat radiation. Cell Genomics 4, 100482 (2024).
Christmas, M. J. et al. Evolutionary constraint and innovation across hundreds of placental mammals. Science 380, eabn3943 (2023).
Noor, M. A., Grams, K. L., Bertucci, L. A. & Reiland, J. Chromosomal inversions and the reproductive isolation of species. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 12084–12088 (2001).
Nachman, M. W. & Payseur, B. A. Recombination rate variation and speciation: theoretical predictions and empirical results from rabbits and mice. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 367, 409–421 (2012).
Edelman, N. B. et al. Genomic architecture and introgression shape a butterfly radiation. Science 366, 594–599 (2019).
Burbrink, F. T., DeBaun, D., Foley, N. M. & Murphy, W. J. Recombination-aware phylogenomics. Trends Ecol. Evol. 9, 900–912 (2025).
Coyne, J. A. & Orr, H. A. Speciation (Sinauer Associates, 2004).
Adrion, J. R., Galloway, J. G. & Kern, A. D. Predicting the landscape of recombination using deep learning. Mol. Biol. Evol. 37, 1790–1808 (2020).
Foley, N. M. et al. A genomic timescale for placental mammal evolution. Science 380, eabl8189 (2023).
Pathak, S. & Stock, A. D. The X chromosomes of mammals: karylogical homology as revealed by banding techniques. Genetics 78, 703–714 (1974).
Graves, J. A. M. Evolution of vertebrate sex chromosomes and dosage compensation. Nat. Rev. Genet. 17, 33–46 (2016).
Lahn, B. T. & Page, D. C. Four evolutionary strata on the human X chromosome. Science 286, 964–967 (1999).
Rieseberg, L. H. Chromosomal rearrangements and speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16, 351–358 (2001).
Haenel, Q., Laurentino, T. G., Roesti, M. & Berner, D. Meta-analysis of chromosome-scale crossover rate variation in eukaryotes and its significance to evolutionary genomics. Mol. Ecol. 27, 2477–2497 (2018).
Carneiro, M. et al. The genomic architecture of population divergence between subspecies of the European rabbit. PLoS Genet. 10, e1003519 (2014).
Christmas, M. J. et al. Genetic barriers to historical gene flow between cryptic species of alpine bumblebees revealed by comparative population genomics. Mol. Biol. Evol. 38, 3126–3143 (2021).
Hibbins, M. S. & Hahn, M. W. Phylogenomic approaches to detecting and characterizing introgression. Genetics 220, iyab173 (2022).
Schierup, M. H. & Hein, J. Consequences of recombination on traditional phylogenetic analysis. Genetics 156, 879–891 (2000).
Brashear, W. A., Bredemeyer, K. R. & Murphy, W. J. Genomic architecture constrained placental mammal X chromosome evolution. Genome Res. 31, 1353–1365 (2021).
Kruger, A. N. et al. A neofunctionalized X-linked ampliconic gene family is essential for male fertility and equal sex ratio in mice. Curr. Biol. 29, 3699–3706 (2019).
Davis, B. W. et al. Mechanisms underlying mammalian hybrid sterility in two feline interspecies models. Mol. Biol. Evol. 32, 2534–2546 (2015).
Kaelin, C. B. et al. Ancestry dynamics and trait selection in a designer cat breed. Curr. Biol. 34, 1506–1518 (2024).
Jamieson, A. et al. Limited historical admixture between European wildcats and domestic cats. Curr. Biol. 33, 4751–4760 (2023).
Ai, H., Huang, L. & Ren, J. Genetic diversity, linkage disequilibrium and selection signatures in Chinese and Western pigs revealed by genome-wide SNP markers. PLoS ONE 8, e56001 (2013).
Darlington, C. D. & Mather, K. Elements of Genetics (George Allen & Unwin Ltd, 1949).
Thompson, M. J. & Jiggins, C. D. Supergenes and their role in evolution. Heredity 113, 1–8 (2014).
Berdan, E. L., Flatt, T., Kozak, G. M., Lotterhos, K. E. & Wielstra, B. Genomic architecture of supergenes: connecting form and function. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 377, 20210192 (2022).
Jay, P., Jeffries, D., Hartmann, F. E., Véber, A. & Giraud, T. Why do sex chromosomes progressively lose recombination?. Trends Genet. 40, 564–579 (2024).
Lenormand, T. & Roze, D. Y recombination arrest and degeneration in the absence of sexual dimorphism. Science 375, 663–666 (2022).
Loda, A., Collombet, S. & Heard, E. Gene regulation in time and space during X-chromosome inactivation. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 23, 231–249 (2022).
Sauteraud, R. et al. Inferring genes that escape X-chromosome inactivation reveals important contribution of variable escape genes to sex-biased diseases. Genome Res. 31, 1629–1637 (2021).
Bansal, P., Kondaveeti, Y. & Pinter, S. F. Forged by DXZ4, FIRRE, and ICCE: How tandem repeats shape the active and inactive X chromosome. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 7, 328 (2019).
Westervelt, N. & Chadwick, B. P. Characterization of the ICCE repeat in mammals reveals an evolutionary relationship with the DXZ4 macrosatellite through conserved CTCF binding motifs. Genome Biol. Evol. 10, 2190–2204 (2018).
Bredemeyer, K. R. et al. Rapid macrosatellite evolution promotes X-linked hybrid male sterility in a feline interspecies cross. Mol. Biol. Evol. 38, 5588–5609 (2021).
Guo, J. et al. The adult human testis transcriptional cell atlas. Cell Res. 28, 1141–1157 (2018).
Larson, E. L., Kopania, E. E. K. & Good, J. M. Spermatogenesis and the evolution of mammalian sex chromosomes. Trends Genet. 34, 722 (2018).
Sinnott-Armstrong, N., Naqvi, S., Rivas, M. & Pritchard, J. GWAS of three molecular traits highlights core genes and pathways alongside a highly polygenic background. eLife 10, e58615 (2020).
Rice, W. Sex chromosomes and the evolution of sexual dimorphism. Evolution 38, 735–742 (1984).
Chakrabarty, A., Chakraborty, S., Nandi, D. & Basu, A. Multivariate genetic architecture reveals testosterone-driven sexual antagonism in contemporary humans. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 121, e2404364121 (2024).
Ruth, K. S. et al. Using human genetics to understand the disease impacts of testosterone in men and women. Nat. Med. 26, 252–258 (2020).
Mueller, J. L. et al. Independent specialization of the human and mouse X chromosomes for the male germ line. Nat. Genet. 45, 1083–1087 (2013).
Bohutínská, M. & Peichel, C. L. Divergence time shapes gene reuse during repeated adaptation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 39, 396–407 (2024).
Lenormand, T. & Roze, D. A single theory for the evolution of sex chromosomes and the two rules of speciation. Science 389, eado9032 (2025).
Delmore, K. E., DaCosta, J. M. & Winker, K. Thrushes in love: Extensive gene flow, with differential resistance and selection, obscures and reveals the evolutionary history of a songbird clade. Mol. Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.17635 (2025).
de Queiroz, A. & Gatesy, J. The supermatrix approach to systematics. Trends Ecol. Evol. 22, 34–41 (2007).
Faircloth, B. C. et al. Ultraconserved elements anchor thousands of genetic markers spanning multiple evolutionary timescales. Syst. Biol. 61, 717–726 (2012).
Murat, F. et al. The molecular evolution of spermatogenesis across mammals. Nature 613, 308–316 (2023).
Stiller, J. et al. Complexity of avian evolution revealed by family-level genomes. Nature 629, 851–860 (2024).
Moore, T. X centromeric drive may explain the prevalence of polycystic ovary syndrome and other conditions. Bioessays 46, e2400056 (2024).
O’Brien, S. J., Graphodatsky, A. S. & Perelman, P. L. Atlas of Mammalian Chromosomes (Wiley Blackwell, 2020).
Li, H. Aligning sequence reads, clone sequences and assembly contigs with BWA-MEM. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1303.3997 (2013).
Li, H. & Durbin, R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows–Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25, 1754–1760 (2009).
García-Alcalde, F. et al. Qualimap: evaluating next-generation sequencing alignment data. Bioinformatics 28, 2678–2679 (2012).
Li, H. et al. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25, 2078–2079 (2009).
McKenna, A. et al. The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 20, 1297–1303 (2010).
Van der Auwera, G. A. et al. From FastQ data to high confidence variant calls: the Genome Analysis Toolkit best practices pipeline. Curr. Protoc. Bioinformatics 11, 11.10.1–11.10.33 (2013).
Kumar, S. & Subramanian, S. Mutation rates in mammalian genomes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 803–808 (2002).
Purcell, S. et al. PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 81, 559–575 (2007).
Jombart, T., Devillard, S. & Balloux, F. Discriminant analysis of principal components: a new method for the analysis of genetically structured populations. BMC Genet. 11, 94 (2010).
Wilder, A. P. et al. The contribution of historical processes to contemporary extinction risk in placental mammals. Science 380, eabn5856 (2023).
Danecek, P. et al. The variant call format and VCFtools. Bioinformatics 27, 2156–2158 (2011).
Lovell, J. T. et al. GENESPACE tracks regions of interest and gene copy number variation across multiple genomes. eLife 11, e78526 (2022).
Emms, D. M. & Kelly, S. OrthoFinder: phylogenetic orthology inference for comparative genomics. Genome Biol. 20, 238 (2019).
Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W. & Lipman, D. J. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215, 403–410 (1990).
Porubsky, D. et al. SVbyEye: a visual tool to characterize structural variation among whole-genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 41, btaf332 (2025).
Li, H. Minimap2: pairwise alignment for nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics 34, 3094–3100 (2018).
Murphy, W. J., Foley, N. M., Bredemeyer, K. R., Gatesy, J. & Springer, M. S. Phylogenomics and the genetic architecture of the placental mammal radiation. Annu. Rev. Anim. Biosci. 9, 29–53 (2020).
Korneliussen, T. S., Albrechtsen, A. & Nielsen, R. ANGSD: analysis of next generation sequencing data. BMC Bioinf. 15, 356 (2014).
Harris, A. J., Foley, N. M., Williams, T. L. & Murphy, W. J. Tree House Explorer: a novel genome browser for phylogenomics. Mol. Biol. Evol. 39, msac130 (2022).
Capella-Gutiérrez, S., Silla-Martínez, J. M. & Gabaldón, T. trimAl: a tool for automated alignment trimming in large-scale phylogenetic analyses. Bioinformatics 25, 1972–1973 (2009).
Borowiec, M. L. AMAS: a fast tool for alignment manipulation and computing of summary statistics. PeerJ 4, e1660 (2016).
Minh, B. Q. et al. IQ-TREE 2: New models and efficient methods for phylogenetic inference in the genomic era. Mol. Biol. Evol. 37, 1530–1534 (2020).
Crotty, S. M. et al. GHOST: recovering historical signal from heterotachously evolved sequence alignments. Syst. Biol. 69, 249–264 (2020).
Minh, B. Q., Nguyen, M. A. T. & von Haeseler, A. Ultrafast approximation for phylogenetic bootstrap. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30, 1188–1195 (2013).
Hoang, D. T., Chernomor, O., von Haeseler, A., Minh, B. Q. & Vinh, L. S. UFBoot2: improving the ultrafast bootstrap approximation. Mol. Biol. Evol. 35, 518–522 (2018).
Lemey, P., Salemi, M. & Vandamme, A.-M. The Phylogenetic Handbook: A Practical Approach to Phylogenetic Analysis and Hypothesis Testing (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2009).
Green, R. E. et al. A draft sequence of the Neandertal genome. Science 328, 710–722 (2010).
Feder, J. L. et al. Mayr, Dobzhansky, and Bush and the complexities of sympatric speciation in Rhagoletis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 6573–6580 (2005).
Pandey, R. S., Wilson Sayres, M. A. & Azad, R. K. Detecting evolutionary strata on the human X chromosome in the absence of gametologous Y-linked sequences. Genome Biol. Evol. 5, 1863–1871 (2013).
Gel, B. & Serra, E. karyoploteR: an R/Bioconductor package to plot customizable genomes displaying arbitrary data. Bioinformatics 33, 3088–3090 (2017).
Wickham, H. Ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis (Springer International Publishing, 2016).
Foley, N. An ancient recombination desert is a speciation supergene in placental mammals. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15131984 (2025).
Li, G. et al. A high-resolution SNP array-based linkage map anchors a new domestic cat draft genome assembly and provides detailed patterns of recombination. G3 (Bethesda) 6, 1607–1616 (2016).
