Zhao, W. et al. WildChat: 1M ChatGPT interaction logs in the wild. In Proc. Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations (OpenReview.net, 2024).
Zheng, L. et al. LMSYS-Chat-1M: a large-scale real-world LLM conversation dataset. In Proc. Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations (OpenReview.net, 2024).
Gaebler, J. D., Goel, S., Huq, A. & Tambe, P. Auditing the use of language models to guide hiring decisions. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.03086 (2024).
Sheng, E., Chang, K.-W., Natarajan, P. & Peng, N. The woman worked as a babysitter: on biases in language generation. In Proc. 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (eds Inui. K. et al.) 3407â3412 (Association for Computational Linguistics, 2019).
Nangia, N., Vania, C., Bhalerao, R. & Bowman, S. R. CrowS-Pairs: a challenge dataset for measuring social biases in masked language models. In Proc. 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (eds Webber, B. et al.) 1953â1967 (Association for Computational Linguistics, 2020).
Nadeem, M., Bethke, A. & Reddy, S. StereoSet: measuring stereotypical bias in pretrained language models. In Proc. 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (eds Zong, C. et al.) 5356â5371 (Association for Computational Linguistics, 2021).
Cheng, M., Durmus, E. & Jurafsky, D. Marked personas: using natural language prompts to measure stereotypes in language models. In Proc. 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (eds Rogers, A. et al.) 1504â1532 (Association for Computational Linguistics, 2023).
Bonilla-Silva, E. Racism without Racists: Color-Blind Racism and the Persistence of Racial Inequality in America 4th edn (Rowman & Littlefield, 2014).
Golash-Boza, T. A critical and comprehensive sociological theory of race and racism. Sociol. Race Ethn. 2, 129â141 (2016).
Kasneci, E. et al. ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learn. Individ. Differ. 103, 102274 (2023).
Nay, J. J. et al. Large language models as tax attorneys: a case study in legal capabilities emergence. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 382, 20230159 (2024).
Jiang, L. Y. et al. Health system-scale language models are all-purpose prediction engines. Nature 619, 357â362 (2023).
Bolukbasi, T., Chang, K.-W., Zou, J., Saligrama, V. & Kalai, A. Man is to computer programmer as woman is to homemaker? Debiasing word embeddings. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 30, 4356â4364 (2016).
Caliskan, A., Bryson, J. J. & Narayanan, A. Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biases. Science 356, 183â186 (2017).
Basta, C., Costa-jussà , M. R. & Casas, N. Evaluating the underlying gender bias in contextualized word embeddings. In Proc. First Workshop on Gender Bias in Natural Language Processing (eds Costa-jussà , M. R. et al.) 33â39 (Association for Computational Linguistics, 2019).
Kurita, K., Vyas, N., Pareek, A., Black, A. W. & Tsvetkov, Y. Measuring bias in contextualized word representations. In Proc. First Workshop on Gender Bias in Natural Language Processing (eds Costa-jussà , M. R. et al.) 166â172 (Association for Computational Linguistics, 2019).
Abid, A., Farooqi, M. & Zou, J. Persistent anti-muslim bias in large language models. In Proc. 2021 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society (eds Fourcade, M. et al.) 298â306 (Association for Computing Machinery, 2021).
Bender, E. M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A. & Shmitchell, S. On the dangers of stochastic parrots: can language models be too big? In Proc. 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency 610â623 (Association for Computing Machinery, 2021).
Li, L. & Bamman, D. Gender and representation bias in GPT-3 generated stories. In Proc. Third Workshop on Narrative Understanding (eds Akoury, N. et al.) 48â55 (Association for Computational Linguistics, 2021).
Tamkin, A. et al. Evaluating and mitigating discrimination in language model decisions. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.03689 (2023).
Rae, J. W. et al. Scaling language models: methods, analysis & insights from training Gopher. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.11446 (2021).
Green, L. J. African American English: A Linguistic Introduction (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2002).
King, S. From African American Vernacular English to African American Language: rethinking the study of race and language in African Americansâ speech. Annu. Rev. Linguist. 6, 285â300 (2020).
Purnell, T., Idsardi, W. & Baugh, J. Perceptual and phonetic experiments on American English dialect identification. J. Lang. Soc. Psychol. 18, 10â30 (1999).
Massey, D. S. & Lundy, G. Use of Black English and racial discrimination in urban housing markets: new methods and findings. Urban Aff. Rev. 36, 452â469 (2001).
Dunbar, A., King, S. & Vaughn, C. Dialect on trial: an experimental examination of raciolinguistic ideologies and character judgments. Race Justice https://doi.org/10.1177/21533687241258772 (2024).
Rickford, J. R. & King, S. Language and linguistics on trial: Hearing Rachel Jeantel (and other vernacular speakers) in the courtroom and beyond. Language 92, 948â988 (2016).
Grogger, J. Speech patterns and racial wage inequality. J. Hum. Resour. 46, 1â25 (2011).
Katz, D. & Braly, K. Racial stereotypes of one hundred college students. J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol. 28, 280â290 (1933).
Gilbert, G. M. Stereotype persistance and change among college students. J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol. 46, 245â254 (1951).
Karlins, M., Coffman, T. L. & Walters, G. On the fading of social stereotypes: studies in three generations of college students. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 13, 1â16 (1969).
Devine, P. G. & Elliot, A. J. Are racial stereotypes really fading? The Princeton Trilogy revisited. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 21, 1139â1150 (1995).
Madon, S. et al. Ethnic and national stereotypes: the Princeton Trilogy revisited and revised. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 27, 996â1010 (2001).
Bergsieker, H. B., Leslie, L. M., Constantine, V. S. & Fiske, S. T. Stereotyping by omission: eliminate the negative, accentuate the positive. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 102, 1214â1238 (2012).
Ghavami, N. & Peplau, L. A. An intersectional analysis of gender and ethnic stereotypes: testing three hypotheses. Psychol. Women Q. 37, 113â127 (2013).
Lambert, W. E., Hodgson, R. C., Gardner, R. C. & Fillenbaum, S. Evaluational reactions to spoken languages. J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol. 60, 44â51 (1960).
Ball, P. Stereotypes of Anglo-Saxon and non-Anglo-Saxon accents: some exploratory Australian studies with the matched guise technique. Lang. Sci. 5, 163â183 (1983).
Thomas, E. R. & Reaser, J. Delimiting perceptual cues used for the ethnic labeling of African American and European American voices. J. Socioling. 8, 54â87 (2004).
Atkins, C. P. Do employment recruiters discriminate on the basis of nonstandard dialect? J. Employ. Couns. 30, 108â118 (1993).
Payne, K., Downing, J. & Fleming, J. C. Speaking Ebonics in a professional context: the role of ethos/source credibility and perceived sociability of the speaker. J. Tech. Writ. Commun. 30, 367â383 (2000).
Rodriguez, J. I., Cargile, A. C. & Rich, M. D. Reactions to African-American vernacular English: do more phonological features matter? West. J. Black Stud. 28, 407â414 (2004).
Billings, A. C. Beyond the Ebonics debate: attitudes about Black and standard American English. J. Black Stud. 36, 68â81 (2005).
Kurinec, C. A. & Weaver, C. III âSounding Blackâ: speech stereotypicality activates racial stereotypes and expectations about appearance. Front. Psychol. 12, 785283 (2021).
Rosa, J. & Flores, N. Unsettling race and language: toward a raciolinguistic perspective. Lang. Soc. 46, 621â647 (2017).
Salehi, B., Hovy, D., Hovy, E. & Søgaard, A. Huntsville, hospitals, and hockey teams: names can reveal your location. In Proc. 3rd Workshop on Noisy User-generated Text (eds Derczynski, L. et al.) 116â121 (Association for Computational Linguistics, 2017).
Radford, A. et al. Language models are unsupervised multitask learners. OpenAI https://cdn.openai.com/better-language-models/language_models_are_unsupervised_multitask_learners.pdf (2019).
Liu, Y. et al. RoBERTa: a robustly optimized BERT pretraining approach. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.11692 (2019).
Raffel, C. et al. Exploring the limits of transfer learning with a unified text-to-text transformer. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 21, 1â67 (2020).
Ouyang, L. et al. Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback. In Proc. 36th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (eds Koyejo, S. et al.) 27730â27744 (NeurIPS, 2022).
OpenAI et al. GPT-4 technical report. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.08774 (2023).
Zhang, E. & Zhang, Y. Average precision. In Encyclopedia of Database Systems (eds Liu, L. & Ãzsu, M. T.) 192â193 (Springer, 2009).
Black, J. S. & van Esch, P. AI-enabled recruiting: what is it and how should a manager use it? Bus. Horiz. 63, 215â226 (2020).
Hunkenschroer, A. L. & Luetge, C. Ethics of AI-enabled recruiting and selection: a review and research agenda. J. Bus. Ethics 178, 977â1007 (2022).
Upadhyay, A. K. & Khandelwal, K. Applying artificial intelligence: implications for recruitment. Strateg. HR Rev. 17, 255â258 (2018).
Tippins, N. T., Oswald, F. L. & McPhail, S. M. Scientific, legal, and ethical concerns about AI-based personnel selection tools: a call to action. Pers. Assess. Decis. 7, 1 (2021).
Aletras, N., Tsarapatsanis, D., Preoţiuc-Pietro, D. & Lampos, V. Predicting judicial decisions of the European Court of Human Rights: a natural language processing perspective. PeerJ Comput. Sci. 2, e93 (2016).
Surden, H. Artificial intelligence and law: an overview. Ga State Univ. Law Rev. 35, 1305â1337 (2019).
Medvedeva, M., Vols, M. & Wieling, M. Using machine learning to predict decisions of the European Court of Human Rights. Artif. Intell. Law 28, 237â266 (2020).
Weidinger, L. et al. Taxonomy of risks posed by language models. In Proc. 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency 214â229 (Association for Computing Machinery, 2022).
Czopp, A. M. & Monteith, M. J. Thinking well of African Americans: measuring complimentary stereotypes and negative prejudice. Basic Appl. Soc. Psychol. 28, 233â250 (2006).
Chowdhery, A. et al. PaLM: scaling language modeling with pathways. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 24, 11324â11436 (2023).
Bai, Y. et al. Training a helpful and harmless assistant with reinforcement learning from human feedback. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2204.05862 (2022).
Brown, T. B. et al. Language models are few-shot learners. In Proc. 34th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (eds Larochelle, H. et al.) 1877â1901 (NeurIPS, 2020).
Dovidio, J. F. & Gaertner, S. L. Aversive racism. Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 36, 1â52 (2004).
Schuman, H., Steeh, C., Bobo, L. D. & Krysan, M. (eds) Racial Attitudes in America: Trends and Interpretations (Harvard Univ. Press, 1998).
Crosby, F., Bromley, S. & Saxe, L. Recent unobtrusive studies of Black and White discrimination and prejudice: a literature review. Psychol. Bull. 87, 546â563 (1980).
Terkel, S. Race: How Blacks and Whites Think and Feel about the American Obsession (New Press, 1992).
Jackman, M. R. & Muha, M. J. Education and intergroup attitudes: moral enlightenment, superficial democratic commitment, or ideological refinement? Am. Sociol. Rev. 49, 751â769 (1984).
Bonilla-Silva, E. The New Racism: Racial Structure in the United States, 1960sâ1990s. In Race, Ethnicity, and Nationality in the United States: Toward the Twenty-First Century 1st edn (ed. Wong, P.) Ch. 4 (Westview Press, 1999).
Gao, L. et al. The Pile: an 800GB dataset of diverse text for language modeling. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.00027 (2021).
Ronkin, M. & Karn, H. E. Mock Ebonics: linguistic racism in parodies of Ebonics on the internet. J. Socioling. 3, 360â380 (1999).
Dodge, J. et al. Documenting large webtext corpora: a case study on the Colossal Clean Crawled Corpus. In Proc. 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (eds Moens, M.-F. et al.) 1286â1305 (Association for Computational Linguistics, 2021).
Steed, R., Panda, S., Kobren, A. & Wick, M. Upstream mitigation is not all you need: testing the bias transfer hypothesis in pre-trained language models. In Proc. 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (eds Muresan, S. et al.) 3524â3542 (Association for Computational Linguistics, 2022).
Feng, S., Park, C. Y., Liu, Y. & Tsvetkov, Y. From pretraining data to language models to downstream tasks: tracking the trails of political biases leading to unfair NLP models. In Proc. 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (eds Rogers, A. et al.) 11737â11762 (Association for Computational Linguistics, 2023).
Köksal, A. et al. Language-agnostic bias detection in language models with bias probing. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2023 (eds Bouamor, H. et al.) 12735â12747 (Association for Computational Linguistics, 2023).
Garg, N., Schiebinger, L., Jurafsky, D. & Zou, J. Word embeddings quantify 100 years of gender and ethnic stereotypes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, E3635âE3644 (2018).
Ferrer, X., van Nuenen, T., Such, J. M. & Criado, N. Discovering and categorising language biases in Reddit. In Proc. Fifteenth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (eds Budak, C. et al.) 140â151 (Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence, 2021).
Ethayarajh, K., Choi, Y. & Swayamdipta, S. Understanding dataset difficulty with V-usable information. In Proc. 39th International Conference on Machine Learning (eds Chaudhuri, K. et al.) 5988â6008 (Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, 2022).
Hoffmann, J. et al. Training compute-optimal large language models. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.15556 (2022).
Liang, P. et al. Holistic evaluation of language models. Transactions on Machine Learning Research https://openreview.net/forum?id=iO4LZibEqW (2023).
Blodgett, S. L., Barocas, S., Daumé III, H. & Wallach, H. Language (technology) is power: A critical survey of âbiasâ in NLP. In Proc. 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (eds Jurafsky, D. et al.) 5454â5476 (Association for Computational Linguistics, 2020).
Jørgensen, A., Hovy, D. & Søgaard, A. Challenges of studying and processing dialects in social media. In Proc. Workshop on Noisy User-generated Text (eds Xu, W. et al.) 9â18 (Association for Computational Linguistics, 2015).
Blodgett, S. L., Green, L. & OâConnor, B. Demographic dialectal variation in social media: a case study of African-American English. In Proc. 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (eds Su, J. et al.) 1119â1130 (Association for Computational Linguistics, 2016).
Jørgensen, A., Hovy, D. & Søgaard, A. Learning a POS tagger for AAVE-like language. In Proc. 2016 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (eds Knight, K. et al.) 1115â1120 (Association for Computational Linguistics, 2016).
Blodgett, S. L. & OâConnor, B. Racial disparity in natural language processing: a case study of social media African-American English. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1707.00061 (2017).
Blodgett, S. L., Wei, J. & OâConnor, B. Twitter universal dependency parsing for African-American and mainstream American English. In Proc. 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (eds Gurevych, I. & Miyao, Y.) 1415â1425 (Association for Computational Linguistics, 2018).
Groenwold, S. et al. Investigating African-American vernacular English in transformer-based text generation. In Proc. 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (eds Webber, B. et al.) 5877â5883 (Association for Computational Linguistics, 2020).
Ziems, C., Chen, J., Harris, C., Anderson, J. & Yang, D. VALUE: Understanding dialect disparity in NLU. In Proc. 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (eds Muresan, S. et al.) 3701â3720 (Association for Computational Linguistics, 2022).
Davidson, T., Bhattacharya, D. & Weber, I. Racial bias in hate speech and abusive language detection datasets. In Proc. Third Workshop on Abusive Language Online (eds Roberts, S. T. et al.) 25â35 (Association for Computational Linguistics, 2019).
Sap, M., Card, D., Gabriel, S., Choi, Y. & Smith, N. A. The risk of racial bias in hate speech detection. In Proc. 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (eds Korhonen, A. et al.) 1668â1678 (Association for Computational Linguistics, 2019).
Harris, C., Halevy, M., Howard, A., Bruckman, A. & Yang, D. Exploring the role of grammar and word choice in bias toward African American English (AAE) in hate speech classification. In Proc. 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency 789â798 (Association for Computing Machinery, 2022).
Gururangan, S. et al. Whose language counts as high quality? Measuring language ideologies in text data selection. In Proc. 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (eds Goldberg, Y. et al.) 2562â2580 (Association for Computational Linguistics, 2022).
Gaies, S. J. & Beebe, J. D. The matched-guise technique for measuring attitudes and their implications for language education: a critical assessment. In Language Acquisition and the Second/Foreign Language Classroom (ed. Sadtano, E.) 156â178 (SEAMEO Regional Language Centre, 1991).
Hudson, R. A. Sociolinguistics (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1996).
Delobelle, P., Tokpo, E., Calders, T. & Berendt, B. Measuring fairness with biased rulers: a comparative study on bias metrics for pre-trained language models. In Proc. 2022 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (eds Carpuat, M. et al.) 1693â1706 (Association for Computational Linguistics, 2022).
Mattern, J., Jin, Z., Sachan, M., Mihalcea, R. & Schölkopf, B. Understanding stereotypes in language models: Towards robust measurement and zero-shot debiasing. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.10678 (2022).
Eisenstein, J., OâConnor, B., Smith, N. A. & Xing, E. P. A latent variable model for geographic lexical variation. In Proc. 2010 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (eds Li, H. & MÃ rquez, L.) 1277â1287 (Association for Computational Linguistics, 2010).
Doyle, G. Mapping dialectal variation by querying social media. In Proc. 14th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (eds Wintner, S. et al.) 98â106 (Association for Computational Linguistics, 2014).
Huang, Y., Guo, D., Kasakoff, A. & Grieve, J. Understanding U.S. regional linguistic variation with Twitter data analysis. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 59, 244â255 (2016).
Eisenstein, J. What to do about bad language on the internet. In Proc. 2013 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (eds Vanderwende, L. et al.) 359â369 (Association for Computational Linguistics, 2013).
Eisenstein, J. Systematic patterning in phonologically-motivated orthographic variation. J. Socioling. 19, 161â188 (2015).
Jones, T. Toward a description of African American vernacular English dialect regions using âBlack Twitterâ. Am. Speech 90, 403â440 (2015).
Christiano, P. F. et al. Deep reinforcement learning from human preferences. Proc. 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (eds von Luxburg, U. et al.) 4302â4310 (NeurIPS, 2017).
Zhao, T. Z., Wallace, E., Feng, S., Klein, D. & Singh, S. Calibrate before use: Improving few-shot performance of language models. In Proc. 38th International Conference on Machine Learning (eds Meila, M. & Zhang, T.) 12697â12706 (Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, 2021).
Smith, T. W. & Son, J. Measuring Occupational Prestige on the 2012 General Social Survey (NORC at Univ. Chicago, 2014).
Zhao, J., Wang, T., Yatskar, M., Ordonez, V. & Chang, K.-W. Gender bias in coreference resolution: evaluation and debiasing methods. In Proc. 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (eds Walker, M. et al.) 15â20 (Association for Computational Linguistics, 2018).
Hughes, B. T., Srivastava, S., Leszko, M. & Condon, D. M. Occupational prestige: the status component of socioeconomic status. Collabra Psychol. 10, 92882 (2024).
Gramlich, J. The gap between the number of blacks and whites in prison is shrinking. Pew Research Centre https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2019/04/30/shrinking-gap-between-number-of-blacks-and-whites-in-prison (2019).
Walsh, A. The criminal justice system is riddled with racial disparities. Prison Policy Initiative Briefing https://www.prisonpolicy.org/blog/2016/08/15/cjrace (2016).
Röttger, P. et al. Political compass or spinning arrow? Towards more meaningful evaluations for values and opinions in large language models. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.16786 (2024).
Jurafsky, D. & Martin, J. H. Speech and Language Processing: An Introduction to Natural Language Processing, Computational Linguistics, and Speech Recognition (Prentice Hall, 2000).
Salazar, J., Liang, D., Nguyen, T. Q. & Kirchhoff, K. Masked language model scoring. In Proc. 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (eds Jurafsky, D. et al.) 2699â2712 (Association for Computational Linguistics, 2020).
Santurkar, S. et al. Whose opinions do language models reflect? In Proc. 40th International Conference on Machine Learning (eds Krause, A. et al.) 29971â30004 (Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, 2023).
Francis, W. N. & Kucera, H. Brown Corpus Manual (Brown Univ.,1979).
Ziems, C. et al. Multi-VALUE: a framework for cross-dialectal English NLP. In Proc. 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (eds Rogers, A. et al.) 744â768 (Association for Computational Linguistics, 2023).
