AOPA Calls Members to Action to Limit ADS-B Misuse
(News and Commentary.) The Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association (AOPA) has launched a new call to action urging its members to support federal legislation aimed at limiting how Automatic Dependent Surveillance Broadcast data can be used. The effort reflects growing concern among general aviation pilots that a system introduced to improve safety is now being applied in ways that may discourage participation and erode trust.
ADS-B, which became mandatory for most controlled airspace in 2020, has been widely credited with improving situational awareness and reducing accident rates in general aviation. But according to AOPA, some airports and third parties are using ADS-B data to assess landing and usage fees, prompting fears that pilots are being penalized for compliance with a safety mandate.
Pilot and Aircraft Privacy Act
AOPA is backing the Pilot and Aircraft Privacy Act, legislation introduced in both chambers of Congress that would restrict the use of ADS-B data for fee collection, clarify that the technology is intended for safety and efficiency, and limit the use of ADS-B data as the sole basis for non-criminal investigations. The organization argues that secondary uses of surveillance data risk undermining voluntary equipage and long-term safety gains.
From the pilot perspective, the concern is not about ADS-B itself, but about incentives. If safety equipment becomes a tool for monetization or surveillance beyond its stated purpose, pilots may be tempted to limit its use where possible. In AOPA’s view, that outcome would be counterproductive in an airspace that depends on cooperation and transparency.
At the same time, the debate is unfolding against a backdrop of increasing airspace complexity. Commercial aviation traffic continues to grow, while uncrewed aircraft systems are expanding beyond niche operations toward routine inspection, delivery, and public safety missions. Air traffic control agencies are under pressure to manage this convergence safely, often with limited staffing and legacy infrastructure.
What About Drones?
That broader context was outlined in The Elephant in the Airspace, an essay by Mark Bathrick, published in Commercial UAV News. Bathrick argues that the central challenge facing aviation is no longer tied to any single category of aircraft, but to the scale and density of operations now sharing the same airspace. His analysis emphasizes that data sharing and cooperative surveillance are essential if safety is to scale alongside traffic growth.
From that perspective, ADS-B and similar systems are not simply pilot tools. They form part of a broader safety architecture relied upon by air traffic controllers, airline operators, and increasingly, drone operators seeking to integrate into controlled airspace under beyond visual line of sight frameworks. Restrictions on how surveillance data can be accessed or applied may carry implications well beyond general aviation.
Tensions, and Common. Ground
This is where the tension becomes most visible. General aviation pilots are raising valid concerns about privacy, consent, and mission creep. ATC authorities and uncrewed aviation stakeholders, meanwhile, rely on consistent, reliable data to manage risk in increasingly crowded skies. Both sides share an interest in safety, but their operational realities differ.
There is also common ground. AOPA has emphasized that it does not seek to block legitimate operational uses of ADS-B or public flight tracking platforms. Similarly, drone operators have expressed concerns in other contexts about fragmented rules and inconsistent enforcement creating uncertainty and risk. A patchwork of state-level approaches to ADS-B data use could complicate compliance for all airspace users.
The current debate signals a broader transition underway in aviation. As the airspace becomes more interconnected, questions of data governance, transparency, and trust are moving to the center of safety discussions. ADS-B may be the immediate flashpoint, but the underlying issue is how surveillance-based systems are governed in a mixed-use environment.
For policymakers, the challenge will be balancing legitimate privacy concerns with the operational needs of a national airspace system that increasingly depends on shared data. How that balance is struck may shape not only pilot adoption of safety technologies, but also the pace and safety of future airspace integration.
Read more:
Miriam McNabb is the Editor-in-Chief of DRONELIFE and CEO of JobForDrones, a professional drone services marketplace, and a fascinated observer of the emerging drone industry and the regulatory environment for drones. Miriam has penned over 3,000 articles focused on the commercial drone space and is an international speaker and recognized figure in the industry. Miriam has a degree from the University of Chicago and over 20 years of experience in high tech sales and marketing for new technologies.
For drone industry consulting or writing, Email Miriam.
TWITTER:@spaldingbarker
Subscribe to DroneLife here.
