Wednesday, March 18, 2026
No menu items!
HomeNatureA strong constraint on radiative forcing of well-mixed greenhouse gases

A strong constraint on radiative forcing of well-mixed greenhouse gases

  • Forster, P. et al. in Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis (eds Masson-Delmotte, V. et al.) Ch. 7 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2021).

  • Forster, P. M. et al. Indicators of global climate change 2024: annual update of key indicators of the state of the climate system and human influence. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 17, 2641–2680 (2025).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Collins, W. D. et al. Radiative forcing by well-mixed greenhouse gases: estimates from climate models in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fourth Assessment Report (AR4). J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 111, D14317 (2006).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hodnebrog, Ø et al. Global warming potentials and radiative efficiencies of halocarbons and related compounds: a comprehensive review. Rev. Geophys. 51, 300–378 (2013).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Huang, Y., Tan, X. & Xia, Y. Inhomogeneous radiative forcing of homogeneous greenhouse gases. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 121, 2780–2789 (2016).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Soden, B. J., Collins, W. D. & Feldman, D. R. Reducing uncertainties in climate models. Science 361, 326–327 (2018).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • He, H., Kramer, R. J., Soden, B. J. & Jeevanjee, N. State dependence of CO2 forcing and its implications for climate sensitivity. Science 382, 1051–1056 (2023).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Fels, S., Mahlman, J., Schwarzkopf, M. & Sinclair, R. Stratospheric sensitivity to perturbations in ozone and carbon dioxide: radiative and dynamical response. J. Atmos. Sci. 37, 2265–2297 (1980).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Shine, K. P. et al. in Climate Change: The IPCC Scientific Assessment 41–68 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1990).

  • Ramaswamy, V. et al. Radiative forcing of climate: the historical evolution of the radiative forcing concept, the forcing agents and their quantification, and applications. Meteorol. Monogr. 59, 14.1–14.101 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Smith, C. et al. Understanding rapid adjustments to diverse forcing agents. Geophys. Res. Lett. 45, 12–023 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Meinshausen, M. et al. Historical greenhouse gas concentrations for climate modelling (CMIP6). Geosci. Model Dev. 10, 2057–2116 (2017).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Nicholls, Z., Meinshausen, M., Pflüger, M. & Lewis, J. CMIP GHG Forcing (v1.0.0). Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14892947 (2025).

  • Mlynczak, M. G. et al. The spectroscopic foundation of radiative forcing of climate by carbon dioxide. Geophys. Res. Lett. 43, 5318–5325 (2016).

    Article 
    ADS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Etminan, M., Myhre, G., Highwood, E. J. & Shine, K. P. Radiative forcing of carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide: a significant revision of the methane radiative forcing. Geophys. Res. Lett. 43, 12–614 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pincus, R. et al. Benchmark calculations of radiative forcing by greenhouse gases. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 125, e2020JD033483 (2020).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Andrews, T. & Forster, P. M. CO2 forcing induces semi-direct effects with consequences for climate feedback interpretations. Geophys. Res. Lett. 35, L04802 (2008).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhang, M. & Huang, Y. Radiative forcing of quadrupling CO2. J. Clim. 27, 2496–2508 (2014).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jeevanjee, N., Seeley, J. T., Paynter, D. & Fueglistaler, S. An analytical model for spatially varying clear-sky CO2 forcing. J. Clim. 34, 9463–9480 (2021).

    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Myhre, G., Stordal, F., Gausemel, I., Nielsen, C. J. & Mahieu, E. Line-by-line calculations of thermal infrared radiation representative for global condition: CFC-12 as an example. J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer 97, 317–331 (2006).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Byrom, R. E. & Shine, K. P. Methane’s solar radiative forcing. Geophys. Res. Lett. 49, e2022GL098270 (2022).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Czarnecki, P., Polvani, L. M. & Pincus, R. Analytical models of instantaneous radiative forcing across opacity regimes. J. Clim. 38, 7351–7368 (2025).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Koll, D. D. & Cronin, T. W. Earth’s outgoing longwave radiation linear due to H2O greenhouse effect. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 10293–10298 (2018).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Feng, J., Paynter, D., Wang, C. & Menzel, R. How atmospheric humidity drives the outgoing longwave radiation–surface temperature relationship and inter-model spread. Environ. Res. Lett. 18, 104033 (2023).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pincus, R., Hemler, R. & Klein, S. A. Using stochastically generated subcolumns to represent cloud structure in a large-scale model. Mon. Weather Rev. 134, 3644–3656 (2006).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wright, J. S. et al. Differences in tropical high clouds among reanalyses: origins and radiative impacts. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 20, 8989–9030 (2020).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Huang, H. & Huang, Y. Diagnosing the radiation biases in global climate models using radiative kernels. Geophys. Res. Lett. 50, e2023GL103723 (2023).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Smith, C. J. et al. Effective radiative forcing and adjustments in CMIP6 models. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 20, 9591–9618 (2020).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Strow, L. L. & DeSouza-Machado, S. Establishment of AIRS climate-level radiometric stability using radiance anomaly retrievals of minor gases and sea surface temperature. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 13, 4619–4644 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Teixeira, J., Wilson, R. C. & Thrastarson, H. T. Direct observational evidence from space of the effect of CO2 increase on longwave spectral radiances: the unique role of high-spectral-resolution measurements. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 24, 6375–6383 (2024).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kramer, R. J. et al. Observational evidence of increasing global radiative forcing. Geophys. Res. Lett. 48, e2020GL091585 (2021).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hersbach, H. et al. The ERA5 global reanalysis. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 146, 1999–2049 (2020).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lan, X., Thoning, K. W. & Dlugokencky, E. J. Trends in globally-averaged CH4, N2O, and SF6 determined from NOAA Global Monitoring Laboratory measurements. Version 2025-05. NOAA Global Monitoring Laboratory (2025).

  • Oreopoulos, L., Cho, N. & Lee, D. Revisiting cloud overlap with a merged dataset of liquid and ice cloud extinction from CloudSat and CALIPSO. Front. Remote Sens. 3, 1076471 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Mie, G. Beiträge zur Optik trüber Medien, speziell kolloidaler Metallösungen. Ann. Phys. 330, 377–445 (1908).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Mitchell, D. L. Effective diameter in radiation transfer: general definition, applications, and limitations. J. Atmos. Sci. 59, 2330–2346 (2002).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Feng, J., Menzel, R. & Paynter, D. Toward transparency and consistency: an open-source optics parameterization for clouds and precipitation. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. 17, e2024MS004478 (2025).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Loeb, N. G. et al. Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System (CERES) Energy Balanced and Filled (EBAF) top-of-atmosphere (TOA) edition-4.0 data product. J. Clim. 31, 895–918 (2018).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Loeb, N. G. et al. Toward optimal closure of the Earth’s top-of-atmosphere radiation budget. J. Clim. 22, 748–766 (2009).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pincus, R., Mlawer, E. J. & Delamere, J. S. Balancing accuracy, efficiency, and flexibility in radiation calculations for dynamical models. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. 11, 3074–3089 (2019).

    Article 
    ADS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Roemer, F. E., Buehler, S. A. & Menang, K. P. How to think about the clear-sky shortwave water vapor feedback. npj Clim. Atmos. Sci. 8, 274 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Goodwin, P., Williams, R. G., Ceppi, P. & Cael, B. Climate feedbacks derived from spatial gradients in recent climatology. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 130, e2024JD043186 (2025).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gristey, J. J. A perspective on shortwave radiative energy flows in the Earth system. Adv. Atmos. Sci. 43, 295–306 (2026).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Shi, C. et al. Near-global monitoring of surface solar radiation through the construction of a geostationary satellite network observation system. Innovation 6, 100876 (2025).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Shine, K. P., Byrom, R. E. & Checa-Garcia, R. Separating the shortwave and longwave components of greenhouse gas radiative forcing. Atmos. Sci. Lett. 23, e1116 (2022).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Loeb, N. G. et al. Continuity in top-of-atmosphere earth radiation budget observations. J. Clim. 37, 6093–6108 (2024).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Feng, J. Scripts and data for “a strong constraint on radiative forcing of well-mixed greenhouse gases”. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17458936 (2025).

  • NASA/LARC/SD/ASDC. CERES Energy Balanced and Filled (EBAF) TOA and surface monthly means data in netCDF edition 4.2. ASDC https://doi.org/10.5067/TERRA-AQUA-NOAA20/CERES/EBAF_L3B004.2 (2023).

  • Eyring, V. et al. Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization. Geosci. Model Dev. 9, 1937–1958 (2016).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gordon, I. E. et al. The HITRAN2016 molecular spectroscopic database. J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer 203, 3–69 (2017).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Mlawer, E. J. et al. Development and recent evaluation of the MT_CKD model of continuum absorption. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 370, 2520–2556 (2012).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Clough, S. A. et al. Atmospheric radiative transfer modeling: a summary of the AER codes. J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer 91, 233–244 (2005).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dudhia, A. The reference forward model (RFM). J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer 186, 243–253 (2017).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cheruy, F., Scott, N., Armante, R., Tournier, B. & Chedin, A. Contribution to the development of radiative transfer models for high spectral resolution observations in the infrared. J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer 53, 597–611 (1995).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Buehler, S. A. et al. ARTS, the Atmospheric Radiative Transfer Simulator–version 2.2, the planetary toolbox edition. Geosci. Model Dev. 11, 1537–1556 (2018).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Feng, J. & Huang, Y. Impacts of tropical cyclones on the thermodynamic conditions in the tropical tropopause layer observed by A-Train satellites. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 21, 15493–15518 (2021).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Liu, L., Huang, Y. & Gyakum, J. R. Clouds reduce downwelling longwave radiation over land in a warming climate. Nature 637, 868–874 (2025).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Yang, P. et al. Spectrally consistent scattering, absorption, and polarization properties of atmospheric ice crystals at wavelengths from 0.2 to 100 μm. J. Atmos. Sci. 70, 330–347 (2013).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Raghuraman, S. P., Paynter, D., Ramaswamy, V., Menzel, R. & Huang, X. Greenhouse gas forcing and climate feedback signatures identified in hyperspectral infrared satellite observations. Geophys. Res. Lett. 50, e2023GL103947 (2023).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Letu, H. et al. Ice cloud properties from Himawari-8/AHI next-generation geostationary satellite: capability of the AHI to monitor the DC cloud generation process. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 57, 3229–3239 (2018).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Li, M. et al. Investigation of ice cloud modeling capabilities for the irregularly shaped Voronoi ice scattering models in climate simulations. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 22, 4809–4825 (2022).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hersbach, H. et al. ERA5 monthly averaged data on pressure levels from 1940 to present. Climate Data Store https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.6860a573 (2023).

  • Lan, X. et al. Trends in globally-averaged CO2 determined from NOAA Global Monitoring Laboratory measurements. NOAA Global Monitoring Laboratory (2023).

  • Huang, Y. & Bani Shahabadi, M. Why logarithmic? A note on the dependence of radiative forcing on gas concentration. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 119, 13–683 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Forster, P. M. de F. et al. Resolution of the uncertainties in the radiative forcing of HFC-134a. J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer 93, 447–460 (2005).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chen, Y.-T., Merlis, T. M. & Huang, Y. The cause of negative CO2 forcing at the top-of-atmosphere: the role of stratospheric versus tropospheric temperature inversions. Geophys. Res. Lett. 51, e2023GL106433 (2024).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Young, P. J., Thompson, D. W., Rosenlof, K. H., Solomon, S. & Lamarque, J.-F. The seasonal cycle and interannual variability in stratospheric temperatures and links to the Brewer–Dobson circulation: an analysis of MSU and SSU data. J. Clim. 24, 6243–6258 (2011).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cronin, T. W. & Dutta, I. How well do we understand the Planck feedback? J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. 15, e2023MS003729 (2023).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • WMO. Report of the meeting of experts on potential climatic effects of ozone and other minor trace gases. Technical report (1982).

  • Griggs, D. J. & Noguer, M. Climate change 2001: the scientific basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Weather 57, 267–269 (2002).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Myhre, G. et al. in Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) 659–740 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).

  • Chen, Y.-T., Huang, Y. & Merlis, T. M. The global patterns of instantaneous CO2 forcing at the top of the atmosphere and the surface. J. Clim. 36, 6331–6347 (2023).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Byrne, B. & Goldblatt, C. Radiative forcing at high concentrations of well-mixed greenhouse gases. Geophys. Res. Lett. 41, 152–160 (2014).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Shine, K. P. & Myhre, G. The spectral nature of stratospheric temperature adjustment and its application to halocarbon radiative forcing. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. 12, e2019MS001951 (2020).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • The MathWorks, Inc. Mapping Toolbox. https://www.mathworks.com (2021).

  • Feng, J. Scripts for “a strong constraint on radiative forcing of well-mixed greenhouse gases”. Code Ocean https://doi.org/10.24433/CO.0711190.v2 (2026).

  • Wu, T. et al. The Beijing Climate Center Climate System Model (BCC-CSM): the main progress from CMIP5 to CMIP6. Geosci. Model Dev. 12, 1573–1600 (2019).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Voldoire, A. et al. Evaluation of CMIP6 deck experiments with CNRM-CM6-1. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. 11, 2177–2213 (2019).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Boucher, O. et al. Presentation and evaluation of the IPSL-CM6A-LR climate model. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. 12, e2019MS002010 (2020).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Watanabe, M. et al. Improved climate simulation by MIROC5: mean states, variability, and climate sensitivity. J. Clim. 23, 6312–6335 (2010).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Held, I. et al. Structure and performance of GFDL’s CM4.0 climate model. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. 11, 3691–3727 (2019).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Williams, K. D. et al. The Met Office global coupled model 3.0 and 3.1 (GC3.0 and GC3.1) configurations. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. 10, 357–380 (2018).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • RELATED ARTICLES

    Most Popular

    Recent Comments