Western, D., Wright, R. M. & Strum, S. C. (eds). Natural Connections: Perspectives in Community-Based Conservation (Island Press, 1994).
Jonas, H., Makagon, J. & Roe, D. in Conservation standards: From Rights to Responsibilities (International Institute for Environment and Development, 2016). Proposes a set of standards for conservation practice to uphold rather than violate the human rights of Indigenous peoples under international law.
Archer, L. J. et al. Towards fairer conservation: perspectives and ideas from early-career researchers. People Nat. 4, 612–626 (2022).
Warren, T. & Baker, K. J. M. WWF funds guards who have tortured and killed people. Buzzfeed News https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/tomwarren/wwf-world-wide-fund-nature-parks-torture-death (2019).
Weldemichel, T. G. Othering pastoralists, state violence, and the remaking of boundaries in Tanzania’s militarised wildlife conservation sector. Antipode 52, 1496–1518 (2020).
Dhamoon, R. K. Relational othering: critiquing dominance, critiquing the margins. Polit. Groups Identities 9, 873–892 (2021).
Kapoor, I. Hyper-self-reflexive development? Spivak on representing the Third World ‘Other. Third World Q. 25, 627–647 (2004).
Rudd, L. F. Overcoming racism in the twin spheres of conservation science and practice. Proc. R. Soc. B 288, 20211871 (2021). This paper examines the systemic racism in conservation science and practice, reinforced by institutional structures and causing harm to BIPOC communities, and advances proposals to break this vicious cycle of racism.
World Bank. Worldwide Governance Indicators. worldbank.org https://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/worldwide-governance-indicators (2023).
Carney, N. All lives matter, but so does race: Black Lives Matter and the evolving role of social media. Humanity Soc. 40, 180–199 (2016).
Sarkar, S. Exorcising race and empire from American nature conservation. Bioscience 71, 777–779 (2021).
Carroll, T. “It feels like white supremacy losing control”: gleaning local perspectives on “anti-woke” legislation. J. Race Ethn. Polit. 10, 603–631 (2025).
Pailey, R. N. De-centring the ‘white gaze’ of development. Dev. Change 51, 729–745 (2020).
Lartey, N. & Beauchamp, E. Discomfort to Discovery: Exploring Racism and Anti-Racism in Development Narratives (IIED, 2022).
Sapignoli, M. & Hitchcock, R. K. People, Parks, and Power: The Ethics of Conservation-Related Resettlement (Springer, 2023).
Adger, W. N., Kelly, P. M., Winkels, A., Luong, Q. H. & Locke, C. Migration, remittances, livelihood trajectories, and social resilience. Ambio 31, 358–366 (2002).
Brockington, D. & Igoe, J. Eviction for conservation: a global overview. Conserv. Soc. 4, 424–470 (2006).
Peluso, N. L. & Lund, C. New frontiers of land control: Introduction. J. Peasant Stud. 38, 667–681 (2011).
Mollett, S. & Kepe, T. Land Rights, Biodiversity Conservation and Justice: Rethinking Parks and People (Routledge, 2018).
Gurney, G. G., Adams, V. M., Álvarez-Romero, J. G. & Claudet, J. Area-based conservation: taking stock and looking ahead. One Earth 6, 98–104 (2023).
Sandbrook, C. et al. Social considerations are crucial to success in implementing the 30 × 30 global conservation target. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 7, 784–785 (2023).
Hammond, N. L., Dickman, A. & Biggs, D. Examining attention given to threats to elephant conservation on social media. Conserv. Sci. Pract. 4, e12785 (2022).
Dickman, A., Cooney, R., Johnson, P. J., Louis, M. P. & Roe, D. Trophy hunting bans imperil biodiversity. Science 365, 874 (2019). This letter argues that trophy hunting bans could set back conservation in parts of Africa, as well-managed trophy hunting can finance conservation efforts and provide income to marginalized local communities.
Barua, M. Whose issue? Representations of human–elephant conflict in Indian and international media. Sci. Commun. 32, 55–75 (2010).
Martin, A., Mcguire, S. & Sullivan, S. Global environmental justice and biodiversity conservation. Geogr. J. 179, 122–131 (2013).
Brockington, D. & Duffy, R. Capitalism and conservation: the production and reproduction of biodiversity conservation. Antipode 42, 469–484 (2010).
WWF. Embedding Human Rights in Nature Conservation: From Intent to Action (World Wide Fund for Nature, 2023).
The Nature Conservancy. Human rights guide for working with Indigenous people and local communities. The Nature Conservancy https://www.tnchumanrightsguide.org/ (2024).
Jamieson, D. Global environmental justice. R. Instit. Philos. Suppl. 36, 199–210 (1994).
Carpenter, C. Power in Conservation: Environmental Anthropology Beyond Political Ecology (Routledge, 2020). This book argues that an understanding of power through an anthropological lens—particularly a Foucauldian one—is essential to conservation theory and practice.
Büscher, B. & Fletcher, R. Towards convivial conservation. Conserv. Soc. 17, 283–296 (2019).
Adams, W. M. & Hutton, J. People, parks and poverty political ecology and biodiversity conservation. Conserv. Soc. 5, 147–183 (2007).
Barton, G. A. Empire Forestry and the Origins of Environmentalism (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2002).
Cronon, W. Uncommon Ground: Rethinking the Human Place in Nature, Vol. 7 (W. W. Norton & Company, 1996).
Robin, L. & Griffiths, T. Environmental history in Australasia. Environ. Hist. 10, 439–474 (2004).
Wolfe, P. Settler colonialism and the elimination of the native. J. Genocide Res. 8, 387–409 (2006).
Grove, R. H. Green Imperialism: Colonial Expansion, Tropical Island Edens and the Origins of Environmentalism, 1600–1860 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1995). This book traces the origins of modern environmentalism not to Western metropoles, but to the colonial peripheries, and argues that much of modern colonialism has its roots in colonial practices.
Crosby, A. W. Ecological Imperialism: The Biological Expansion of Europe, 900–1900 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1986).
Carruthers, J. The Kruger National Park: A Social and Political History (Univ. of KwaZulu-Natal Press, 1995).
McGinn, P. Capital, ‘development’ and canal irrigation in colonial India. EconPapers https://econpapers.repec.org/paper/schwpaper/209.htm (2009).
Sweeney, S. Financing India’s Imperial Railways, 1875–1914 (Pickering & Chatto Ltd, 2011).
Rangarajan & Shahabuddin, G. Displacement and relocation from protected areas: towards a biological and historical synthesis. Conserv. Soc. 4, 359 (2006).
Baden-Powell, R. S. S. Pigsticking: Or, Hoghunting: A Complete Account for Sportsmen, and Others (Harrison and Sons, 1889).
Shanker, K. & Oommen, M. A. in A Functioning Anarchy? Essays for Ramachandra Guha (eds Raghavan, S. & Sundar, N.) 37–54 (Penguin Random House, 2021).
Büscher, B. ‘Rhino poaching is out of control!’ Violence, race and the politics of hysteria in online conservation. Environ. Plan. A 48, 979–998 (2015).
Igoe, J. Conservation and Globalization: A Study of National Parks and Indigenous Communities from East Africa to South Dakota (Wadsworth, 2004).
McLean, J. & Stræde, S. Conservation, relocation, and the paradigms of park and people management — a case study of Padampur Villages and the Royal Chitwan National Park, Nepal. Soc. Nat. Resour. 16, 509–526 (2003).
Neumann, R. Imposing Wilderness: Struggles Over Livelihoods and Nature Preservation in Africa (Univ. of California Press, 1998).
Brockington, D. Celebrity and the Environment: Fame, Wealth and Power in Conservation (Zed Books, 2009).
Adams, J. S. & McShane, T. O. The Myth of Wild Africa: Conservation Without Illusion (Univ. of California Press, 1997).
Büscher, B. et al. Half-Earth or whole Earth? Radical ideas for conservation, and their implications. Oryx 51, 407–410 (2017). This paper criticizes the ‘half-Earth’ proposal, arguing that it would require a massive increase in protected areas that would necessitate the mass displacement of mostly vulnerable human populations globally, perpetuating historic injustices.
Tauli-Corpuz, V., Alcorn, J., Molnar, A., Healy, C. & Barrow, E. Cornered by PAs: adopting rights-based approaches to enable cost-effective conservation and climate action. World Dev. 130, 104923 (2020). This study traces how protected areas the world over come at the cost of and violate the rights of IPLCs, while their contribution in conserving nearly two billion hectares of land goes unrecognized.
IPBES. Global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3831674 (2019).
Garnett, S. T. et al. A spatial overview of the global importance of Indigenous lands for conservation. Nat. Sustain. 1, 369–374 (2018).
Somanathan, E., Prabhakar, R. & Mehta, B. S. Decentralization for cost-effective conservation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 4143–4147 (2009).
Domínguez, L. & Luoma, C. Decolonising conservation policy: how colonial land and conservation ideologies persist and perpetuate Indigenous injustices at the expense of the environment. Land 9, 65 (2020).
CBD. Kunming–Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework. Convention on Biological Diversity https://www.cbd.int/gbf (2022).
Sibanda, L. et al. Avoiding an impending collision in international conservation. Conserv. Biol. 39, e14450 (2025).
Duffy, R. et al. Why we must question the militarisation of conservation. Biol. Conserv. 232, 66–73 (2019).
Bobo, L. & Tuan, M. Prejudice in Politics: Group Position, Public Opinion, and the Wisconsin Treaty Rights Dispute (Harvard Univ. Press, 2006).
Bobo, L. D. Racism in Trump’s America: reflections on culture, sociology, and the 2016 US presidential election. Br. J. Sociol. 68, S85–S104 (2017).
Jardina, A. & Piston, S. The politics of racist dehumanization in the United States. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci. 26, 369–388 (2023). This review examines the racist dehumanization of Black and Indigenous people in the USA, arguing that conventional white racial prejudice can be understood in part as the residue of processes of dehumanization.
Kteily, N., Bruneau, E., Waytz, A. & Cotterill, S. The ascent of man: theoretical and empirical evidence for blatant dehumanization. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 109, 901–931 (2015).
van Eeden, L. M. et al. Exploring nationality and social identity to explain attitudes toward conservation actions in the United States and Australia. Conserv. Biol. 34, 1165–1175 (2020).
Mkono, M. Neo-colonialism and greed: Africans’ views on trophy hunting in social media. J. Sustain. Tour. 27, 689–704 (2019).
Gardner, B. Elite discourses of conservation in Tanzania. Soc. Semiot. 27, 348–358 (2017).
Jadhav, S. & Barua, M. The elephant vanishes: impact of human–elephant conflict on people’s wellbeing. Health Place 18, 1356–1365 (2012).
Niskanen, L., Roe, D., Rowe, W., Dublin, H. & S. D. Strengthening Local Community Engagement in Combatting Illegal Wildlife Trade — Case Studies from Kenya (IIED, 2018).
Losh, J. Beloved silverback gorilla killed by poachers in Uganda. National Geographic https://www.nationalgeographic.com/animals/article/silverback-gorilla-killed-poachers-uganda (2020).
Goff, P. A., Eberhardt, J. L., Williams, M. J. & Jackson, M. C. Not yet human: implicit knowledge, historical dehumanization, and contemporary consequences. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 94, 292–306 (2008).
Husain, Z. Demand to find tigress Avni’s cubs grows louder. The Hindu https://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/mumbai/demand-to-find-tigress-avnis-cubs-grows-louder/article25470378.ece (2018).
Macdonald, D., Jacobsen, K., Burnham, D., Johnson, P. & Loveridge, A. Cecil: a moment or a movement? Analysis of media coverage of the death of a lion, Panthera leo. Animals 6, 26 (2016).
Gajanan, M. Cecil the lion’s death prompts calls to ban trophy hunt imports to US. The Guardian https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/jul/28/cecil-african-lion-import-ban-trophy-hunting (2015).
Nzou, G. In Zimbabwe, we don’t cry for lions. The New York Times https://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/05/opinion/in-zimbabwe-we-dont-cry-for-lions.html (2015).
Cassim, J. Wild animals kill more people than COVID-19 in Zimbabwe. AA https://www.aa.com.tr/en/africa/wild-animals-kill-more-people-than-covid-19-in-zimbabwe/1860688 (2020).
O’Donnell, E., Poelina, A., Pelizzon, A. & Clark, C. Stop burying the lede: the essential role of Indigenous law(s) in creating rights of nature. Transnat. Environ. Law 9, 403–427 (2020). This paper argues that the rights of nature movement underplays the crucial role of Indigenous peoples in pushing the most transformative cases, and posits that such a movement can only be successful with Indigenous leadership.
Gilbert, J. The rights of nature, Indigenous peoples and international human rights law: from dichotomies to synergies. J. Hum. Rights Environ. 13, 399–415 (2022).
Newing, H. et al. ‘Participatory’ conservation research involving indigenous peoples and local communities: fourteen principles for good practice. Biol. Conserv. 296, 110708 (2024).
UNEP. Core Human Rights Principles for Private Conservation Organizations and Funders (United Nations Environment Programme, 2024).
World Conservation Society. Conservation and Human Rights: A Framework for Action (World Conservation Society, 2009).
Norfolk, S., Quan, J. & Mullins, D. Options for Securing Tenure and Documenting Land Rights in Mozambique: A Land Policy & Practise Paper (LEGEND, 2022).
Rahmatiar, Y. Legal protection and rights of Indigenous peoples: legal certainty in managing natural resources. Pena Justisia 22, 1485–1505 (2023).
Springer, J., Campese, J. & Painter, M. Conservation and Human Rights: Key Issues and Contexts Scoping Paper for the Conservation Initiative on Human Rights (IUCN, 2011).
Sarma, U. K. & Barpujari, I. Coexistence and the SDGs: an argument for a rights-based approach to human–wildlife conflict in India. Hum. Dimens. Wildl. 30, 248–256 (2025).
Newing, H., Fisher, M., Brittain, S., Kenrick, J. & Milner-Gulland, E. J. How can we advance equitable, rights-based conservation?. Oryx 57, 273–274 (2023).
Tauli-Corpuz, V., Alcorn, J., Molnar, A., Healy, C. & Barrow, E. Cornered by PAs: adopting rights-based approaches to enable cost-effective conservation and climate action. World Dev. 130, 104923 (2020).
Wiessner, S. The cultural rights of Indigenous peoples:achievements and continuing challenges. Eur. J. Int. Law 22, 121–140 (2011).
Challender, D. W. S., Harrop, S. R. & MacMillan, D. C. Towards informed and multi-faceted wildlife trade interventions. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 3, 129–148 (2015).
Rosencranz, A. et al. The Forest Rights Act 2006: high aspirations, low realization. J. Indian Law Inst. 50, 656–677 (2008).
Kumar, K., Singh, N. & Rao, Y. G. Promise and performance of the Forest Rights Act. Econ. Polit. 52, 40–43 (2017).
Minter, T., de Brabander, V., van der Ploeg, J., Persoon, G. A. & Sunderland, T. Whose consent? Hunter-gatherers and extractive industries in the northeastern Philippines. Soc. Nat. Resour. 25, 1241–1257 (2012).
Greiber, T., Janki, M., Orellana, M., Savaresi, A. & Shelton, D. L. Conservation with justice: a rights-based approach. SSRN https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2225952 (2010).
Lee, R. B. in At the Risk of Being Heard: Identity, Indigenous Rights, and Postcolonial States (eds Dean, B. & Levi, Jerome. M.) 80–111 (Univ. of Michigan Press, 2003).
Johnson, A. in The Fire Now: Anti-Racist Scholarship in Times of Explicit Racial Violence (eds Johnson, A., Joseph-Salisbury, R. & Kamunge, B.) 15–25 (Zedbooks, 2018).
Muller, S., Hemming, S. & Rigney, D. Indigenous sovereignties: relational ontologies and environmental management. Geogr. Res. 57, 399–410 (2019).
Biggs, D. et al. Breaking the deadlock on ivory. Science 358, 1378–1381 (2017).
Natusch, D. J. D., Aust, P. W. & Shine, R. The perils of flawed science in wildlife trade literature. Conserv. Biol. 35, 1396–1404 (2021).
Kansky, R., Kidd, M. & Knight, A. T. A wildlife tolerance model and case study for understanding human wildlife conflicts. Biol. Conserv. 201, 137–145 (2022).
Madden, F. & McQuinn, B. Conservation’s blind spot: the case for conflict transformation in wildlife conservation. Biol. Conserv. 178, 97–106 (2014).
Lynch, A. J. J., Fell, D. G. & McIntyre-Tamwoy, S. Incorporating Indigenous values with ‘Western’ conservation values in sustainable biodiversity management. Australas. J. Environ. Manag. 17, 244–255 (2010). This paper studies the difference in priorities and outlook between Indigenous cultural values and Western conservation values, and argues for a more participatory model.
Newing, H. & Perram, A. What do you know about conservation and human rights?. ORYX 53, 595–596 (2019).
Oviedo, G. et al. Conservation and Human Rights: The Need for International Standards (IIED, 2010).
Montgomery, R. A., Borona, K., Kasozi, H., Mudumba, T. & Ogada, M. Positioning human heritage at the center of conservation practice. Conserv. Biol. 34, 1122 (2020).
Fraser, N. & Honneth, A. Redistribution or Recognition? — A Political–Philosophical Exchange (Verso, 2003).
Adams, W. M. et al. Biodiversity conservation and the eradication of poverty. Science 306, 1146–1149 (2004).
Wells, M., Brandon, K. & Hannah, L. People and Parks: Linking Protected Area Management with Local Communities (World Bank, 1992).
CBD. Article 8(j) — Traditional Knowledge, Innovations and Practices (Convention on Biological Diversity, 2025).
CBD. Article 10 — Sustainable Use of Components of Biological Diversity (Convention on Biological Diversity, 2006).
Gadgil, M., Berkes, F. & Folke, C. Indigenous knowledge for biodiversity conservation. Ambio 22, 151–156 (1993).
Schroeder, H. & González, P. N. C. Bridging knowledge divides: the case of indigenous ontologies of territoriality and REDD. For. Policy Econ.100, 198–206 (2020).
Northwest Indian Fisheries Commission. Annual report. nwifc.org https://nwifc.org/publications/annual-report/ (2020).
Artelle, K. A. et al. Values-led management: the guidance of place-based values in environmental relationships of the past, present, and future. Ecol. Soc. 23, 35 (2018). This synthesis argues that place-based values, held by communities with long historical ties to the place, can guide more effective environmental frameworks than the values of conservationists coming in from the outside.
McElwee, P. et al. Working with Indigenous and local knowledge (ILK) in large-scale ecological assessments: reviewing the experience of the IPBES Global Assessment. J. Appl. Ecol. 57, 1666–1676 (2020).
Reo, N. J. Inawendiwin and relational accountability in Anishnaabeg studies: the crux of the biscuit. J. Ethnobiol. 39, 65 (2019).
Blake, E. Tribal co-management: a monumental undertaking? Ecol. Law Q. 48, 249 (2021).
Schroeder, D., Chennells, R., Louw, C., Snyders, L. & Hodges, T. The Rooibos Benefit Sharing Agreement—breaking new ground with respect, honesty, fairness, and care. Camb. Q. Healthc. Ethics 29, 285–301 (2020).
Davis, J. M. & Swiss, L. Need, merit, self-interest or convenience? Exploring aid allocation motives of grassroots international NGOs. J. Int. Dev. 32, 1324–1345 (2020).
Phelps, J., Webb, E. L. & Agrawal, A. Does REDD + threaten to recentralize forest governance?. Science 328, 312–313 (2010).
Osborne, T. et al. Climate justice, forests, and Indigenous peoples: toward an alternative to REDD+ for the Amazon. Clim. Change 177, 128 (2024).
Biggs, D. et al. Insights on fostering the emergence of robust conservation actions from Zimbabwe’s CAMPFIRE program. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 17, e00538 (2019).
Chaudhury, A. & Colla, S. Next steps in dismantling discrimination: Lessons from ecology and conservation science. Conserv. Lett. 14, e12774 (2021).
Pienkowski, T. et al. Recognizing reflexivity among conservation practitioners. Conserv. Biol. 37, e14022 (2023).
Beck, J. M., Elliott, K. C., Booher, C. R., Renn, K. A. & Montgomery, R. A. The application of reflexivity for conservation science. Biol. Conserv. 262, 109322 (2021).
Cronin, M. R. et al. Anti-racist interventions to transform ecology, evolution and conservation biology departments. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 5, 1213–1223 (2021). This perspective provides a practical toolkit of evidence-based interventions that departments in ecology, evolution, and conservation biology can adopt to foster anti-racism, not just in terms of diversity, but also practice in the field.
Hà, B. A., Foxx, K., Mensah, S. T., Barber, P. H. & Kennison, R. L. Interdisciplinary approaches to advancing anti-racist pedagogies in ecology, evolution, and conservation biology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 38, 683–687 (2023).
Ziltener, P., Künzler, D. & Walter, A. Measuring the impacts of colonialism: a new data set for the countries of Africa and Asia. J. World Syst. Res. 23, 156–190 (2017).
Ochoa-Ochoa, L. M., Devillamagallón, R., Castillo-Ramírez, G. & Cordero-Marines, L. Effects of Atlanticists policies and visions: the legacy of colonialism in conservation. Biol. Conserv. 282, 110070 (2023).
Cooke, S. J. et al. Reconceptualizing conservation. PLOS Sustain. Transform. 1, e0000016 (2022).
Ocampo-Ariza, C. et al. Global south leadership towards inclusive tropical ecology and conservation. Perspect. Ecol. Conserv. 21, 17–24 (2023).
Whyte, K. P. On the role of traditional ecological knowledge as a collaborative concept: a philosophical study. Ecol. Process. 2, 7 (2013).
Gillette, M., Shebitz, D. & Singleton, B. Doing conservation differently: toward a diverse conservations inventory. Ethnobiol. Lett. 14, 1–9 (2023).
Child, B. & Jones, B. Overview Article: Practical Tools for Community Conservation in Southern Africa (PLA 55) (IIED, 2006).
Greenwood, D. J., Whyte, W. F. & Harkavy, I. Participatory action research as a process and as a goal. Hum. Relat. 46, 175–192 (1993).
Smith, L. T. Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples (Zed Books, 2021).
Nicholls, R. Research and Indigenous participation: critical reflexive methods. Int. J. Soc. Res. Methodol. 12, 117–126 (2009).
Louis, R. P. Can you hear us now? Voices from the margin: using Indigenous methodologies in geographic research. Geogr. Res. 45, 130–139 (2007).
Grossman, Z. et al. AAG Indigenous Peoples Specialty Group’s Declaration of Key Questions about Research Ethics with Indigenous Communities (Indigenous Peoples’ Secretariat, 2010). This statement poses a set of reflective questions that researchers should ask themselves when engaging in research involving Indigenous communities, to ensure that Indigenous peoples will be rights-bearing partners rather than merely subjects.
Dunaway, M., Allred, S., Somchanhmavong, A. K. & Zaman, T. A pragmatic approach to ethical research collaboration with Indigenous communities: a case study with the Penan people of Long Lamai, Malaysia. Environ. Plann. F 2, 77–95 (2023). This case study on the application of the Association of American Geographers Indigenous Peoples Specialty Group declaration discusses how all its key elements can be implemented in practice, using examples from the Global Citizenship and Sustainability programme in Long Lamai, Malaysia.
McCrummen, S. The great Serengeti land grab. The Atlantic https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2024/05/maasai-tribe-tanzania-forced-land-evictions-serengeti/677835/ (2024).
Presnall, C. C. Wildlife conservation as affected by American Indian and Caucasian concepts. J. Mammal. 24, 458 (1943).
Peters, M. A. & Mika, C. T. Aborigine, Indian, indigenous or first nations? Educ. Phil. Theory 49, 1229–1234 (2017).
UN. United Nations Expert Mechanism on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (United Nations, 2023).
Holmes, G. The rich, the powerful and the endangered: conservation elites, networks and the Dominican Republic. Antipode 42, 624–646 (2010).
Chomba, S. Choices have consequences: REDD+ and local democracy in Kenya. Conserv. Society 15, 400–413 (2017).
Mrema, J. P. in Corruption, Natural Resources and Development (eds Williams, A. & Le Billon, P.) 131–141 (Edward Elgar Publishing, 2017).
Logan, B. I. & Moseley, W. G. The political ecology of poverty alleviation in Zimbabwe’s Communal Areas Management Programme for Indigenous Resources (CAMPFIRE). Geoforum 33, 1–14 (2002).
