Wensing, P. M. et al. Proprioceptive actuator design in the MIT cheetah: impact mitigation and high-bandwidth physical interaction for dynamic legged robots. IEEE Trans. Rob. 33, 509–522 (2017).
Grimminger, F. et al. An open torque-controlled modular robot architecture for legged locomotion research. IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett. 5, 3650–3657 (2020).
Chignoli, M., Kim, D., Stanger-Jones, E. & Kim, S. The MIT humanoid robot: design, motion planning, and control for acrobatic behaviors. In Proc. 2020 IEEE-RAS 20th International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids) 1–8 (IEEE, 2021).
Semasinghe, C., Taylor, D. & Rezazadeh, S. The design and manufacturing of Mithra: a humanoid robot with anthropomorphic attributes and high-performance actuators. Robotics 14, 28 (2025).
Khazoom, C., Hong, S., Chignoli, M., Stanger-Jones, E. & Kim, S. Tailoring solution accuracy for fast whole-body model predictive control of legged robots. IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett. 9, 11074–11081 (2024).
Zhang, J. Z. et al. Whole-body model-predictive control of legged robots with MuJoCo. Preprint at arxiv.org/abs/2503.04613 (2025).
Belvedere, T., Scianca, N., Lanari, L. & Oriolo, G. Joint-level IS-MPC: a whole-body MPC with centroidal feasibility for humanoid locomotion. In Proc. 2024 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) 11240–11247 (IEEE, 2024).
Ishihara, K., Gomi, H. & Morimoto, J. Hierarchical learning framework for whole-body model predictive control of a real humanoid robot. Preprint at arxiv.org/abs/2409.08488 (2024).
Porto, V. G. B. d. A., Melo, D. C., Maximo, M. R. O. A. & Afonso, R. J. M. Imitation learning of a model predictive controller for real-time humanoid robot walking. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 143, 109919 (2025).
Radosavovic, I. et al. Real-world humanoid locomotion with reinforcement learning. Sci. Robot. 9, eadi9579 (2024).
Radosavovic, I., Kamat, S., Darrell, T. & Malik, J. Learning humanoid locomotion over challenging terrain. Preprint at arxiv.org/abs/2410.03654 (2024).
He, T. et al. VIRAL: visual sim-to-real at scale for humanoid loco-manipulation. Preprint at arxiv.org/abs/2511.15200 (2025).
Kim, M. J. et al. Openvla: an open-source vision-language-action model. Preprint at arxiv.org/abs/2406.09246 (2024).
Belkhale, S. et al. RT-H: action hierarchies using language. Preprint at arxiv.org/abs/2403.01823 (2024).
Wen, J. et al. TinyVLA: toward fast, data-efficient vision-language-action models for robotic manipulation. IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett. 10, 3988–3995 (2025).
Zheng, R. et al. Tracevla: visual trace prompting enhances spatial-temporal awareness for generalist robotic policies. Preprint at arxiv.org/abs/2412.10345 (2024).
O’Neill, A. et al. Open X-Embodiment: robotic learning datasets and RT-X models: Open X-Embodiment Collaboration0. In Proc. 2024 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) 6892–6903 (IEEE, 2024).
Figure exceeds $1 billion in Series C funding at $39 billion post-money valuation. Figure AI www.figure.ai/news/series-c (2025).
Health workforce. World Health Organization www.who.int/health-topics/health-workforce#tab=tab_1 (2023).
Cypher, R. L. Burnout and patient safety: an occupational phenomenon. J. Perinat. Neonatal Nurs. 38, 128–130 (2024).
Ageing and health. World Health Organization www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/ageing-and-health (2025).
The Robot Report Staff. Diligent robotics hires 2 former Cruise execs to scale Moxi. The Robot Report http://www.therobotreport.com/diligent-robotics-hires-2-former-cruise-execs-to-scale-moxi/ (10 July 2025).
Lanfranco, A. R., Castellanos, A. E., Desai, J. P. & Meyers, W. C. Robotic surgery: a current perspective. Ann. Surg. 239, 14–21 (2004).
Taylor, R. H., Menciassi, A., Fichtinger, G., Fiorini, P. & Dario, P. in Springer Handbook of Robotics (eds Siciliano, B. & Khatib, O.) 1199–1222 (Springer, 2016).
Bruce, G. Elon Musk says Tesla robot will perform ‘superhuman’ surgeries. Becker’s Health IT www.beckershospitalreview.com/healthcare-information-technology/innovation/elon-musk-says-tesla-robot-will-perform-superhuman-surgeries/ (19 November 2025).
Marinho, M. M., Bernardes, M. C. & Bó, A. P. L. A programmable remote center-of-motion controller for minimally invasive surgery using the dual quaternion framework. In Proc. 5th IEEE RAS/EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics 339–344 (IEEE, 2014).
Marinho, M. M., Adorno, B. V., Harada, K. & Mitsuishi, M. Dynamic active constraints for surgical robots using vector-field inequalities. IEEE Trans. Rob. 35, 1166–1185 (2019).
Nasiri, E. & Wang, L. Admittance control for adaptive remote center of motion in robotic laparoscopic surgery. In Proc. 2024 21st International Conference on Ubiquitous Robots (UR) 51–57 (IEEE, 2024).
Davila, A., Colan, J. & Hasegawa, Y. Real-time inverse kinematics for robotic manipulation under remote center-of-motion constraint using memetic evolution. J. Comput. Des. Eng. 11, 248–264 (2024).
Hagn, U. et al. DLR MiroSurge: a versatile system for research in endoscopic telesurgery. Int. J. Comput. Assist. Radiol. Surg. 5, 183–193 (2010).
Hagn, U. et al. The DLR MIRO: a versatile lightweight robot for surgical applications. Ind. Rob. 35, 324–336 (2008).
Cofran, L. et al. Barriers to safety and efficiency in robotic surgery docking. Surg. Endosc. 36, 206–215 (2022).
Kanji, F. et al. Room size influences flow in robotic-assisted surgery. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 18, 7984 (2021).
Ozturkcan, S. & Merdin-Uygur, E. Humanoid service robots: the future of healthcare? J. Info. Technol. Teaching Cases 12, 163–170 (2022).
Mlakar, I. et al. Facilitating acceptance, trust, and ethical integration of socially assistive robots among nurses: a quasi-experimental study. Health Policy Technol. 14, 101034 (2025).
Haddadin, S. & Croft, E. Physical human–robot interaction. in Springer Handbook of Robotics (eds Siciliano, B. & Khatib, O.) 1835–1874 (Springer, 2016).
Yang, G.-Z. et al. The grand challenges of science robotics. Sci. Robot. 3, eaar7650 (2018).
Atar, S. et al. Humanoids in hospitals: a technical study of humanoid robot surrogates for dexterous medical interventions. Preprint at arxiv.org/abs/2503.12725 (2025).
Battaglia, E. et al. Rethinking autonomous surgery: focusing on enhancement over autonomy. Eur. Urol. Focus 7, 696–705 (2021).
Unitree G1: humanoid Agent AI Avatar. Unitree Robotics https://www.unitree.com/g1/ (2026).
Wilson, J. T., Tsao, T.-C., Hubschman, J.-P. & Schwartz, S. Evaluating remote centers of motion for minimally invasive surgical robots by computer vision. In Proc. 2010 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics 1413–1418 (IEEE, 2010).
de Graaf, P. Optimal positioning of robotic arms inside the abdominal cavity in pediatric surgery. Surgical Robotics Laboratory https://surgicalroboticslab.nl/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/degraaf20-masters.pdf (2020).
Afshar, M. et al. Optimal design of a novel spherical scissor linkage remote center of motion mechanism for medical robotics. In Proc. 2020 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) 6459–6465 (IEEE, 2020).
Freschi, C. et al. Technical review of the da Vinci surgical telemanipulator. Int. J. Med. Robotics Comput. Assist. Surg. 9, 396–406 (2013).
Da Vinci Xi Surgical System in-Service Guide: OR Staff (Da Vinci OS4 v.9) (Intuitive Surgical, 2021).
Kazanzides, P. et al. An open-source research kit for the da Vinci surgical system. In Proc. 2014 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) 6434–6439 (IEEE, 2014).
Richter, F., Orosco, R. K. & Yip, M. C. Motion scaling solutions for improved performance in high delay surgical teleoperation. In Proc. 2019 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) 1590–1595 (IEEE, 2019).
Lu, S. et al. Adaptive control of time delay teleoperation system with uncertain dynamics. Front. Neurorobot. 16, 928863 (2022).
Xiong, Z. et al. ExtremControl: low-latency humanoid teleoperation with direct extremity control. Preprint at arxiv.org/abs/2602.11321 (2026).
Ichihara, J. & Miura, S. Quantifying the effects of delays on telerobotic surgical operability via brain activity measurements. Int. J. Comput. Assist. Radiol. Surg. 20, 2371–2379 (2025).
Ferguson, J. M. et al. Comparing the accuracy of the da Vinci Xi and da Vinci Si for image guidance and automation. Int. J. Med. Robot. 16, 1–10 (2020).
Fryar, C. D., Carroll, M. D., Gu, Q., Afful, J. & Ogden, C. L. Anthropometric reference data for children and adults: United States, 2015–2018. Vital Health Stat. 3, 1–44 (2021).
Nabeel, A. et al. Assessing and evaluating the impact of operative vision compromise (OViC) on surgeons’ practice: a qualitative study. Int. J. Surg. 110, 6972–6981 (2024).
von Strauss und Torney, M. et al. Microcomplications in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: impact on duration of surgery and costs. Surg. Endosc. 30, 2512–2522 (2016).
Rojas Burbano, J. C. et al. Robot-assisted surgery: current applications and future trends in general surgery. Cureus 17, e82318 (2024).
Kim, V. B. et al. Early experience with telemanipulative robot-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy using da vinci. Surg. Laparosc. Endosc. Percutan. Tech. 12, 33–40 (2002).
Rojas, A., Gachabayov, M., Abouezzi, Z. E., Bergamaschi, R. & Latifi, R. Current robotic platforms in surgery and the road ahead. Surg. Technol. Int. 38, 39–46 (2021).
Surgical tools. LivsMed https://livsmed.us/products/ (accessed 26 May 2026).
Macenski, S., Foote, T., Gerkey, B., Lalancette, C. & Woodall, W. Robot operating system 2: design, architecture, and uses in the wild. Sci. Robot. 7, eabm6074 (2022).
Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES). FLS Manual Skills Written Instructions and Performance Guidelines. https://cpd.partners.org/sites/default/files/manual_skills_guidelines[1].pdf (2012).
Liang, Z. & Yip, M. User performance data sheets. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20434260 (2026).
Liang, Z. Laparoscopic humanoid code. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18023650 (2025).
