Thursday, June 18, 2026
No menu items!
HomeNatureRevealing competitive interfacial reactions in high-energy Li–S batteries

Revealing competitive interfacial reactions in high-energy Li–S batteries

  • Bard, A. J. et al. The electrode/electrolyte interface – a status report. J. Phys. Chem. 97, 7147–7173 (1993).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Yao, W. et al. Rechargeable metal-sulfur batteries: key materials to mechanisms. Chem. Rev. 124, 4935–5118 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ji, X., Lee, K. T. & Nazar, L. F. A highly ordered nanostructured carbon–sulphur cathode for lithium–sulphur batteries. Nat. Mater. 8, 500–506 (2009).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Xu, K. Interfaces and interphases in batteries. J. Power Sources 559, 232652 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Choi, S., Yoon, I., Nichols, W. T. & Shin, D. Carbon-coated Li2S cathode for improving the electrochemical properties of an all-solid-state lithium–sulfur battery using Li2S-P2S5 solid electrolyte. Ceram. Int. 44, 7450–7453 (2018).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lin, Z., Liu, Z., Dudney, N. J. & Liang, C. Lithium superionic sulfide cathode for all-solid lithium–sulfur batteries. ACS Nano 7, 2829–2833 (2013).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sun, J. et al. Will lithium–sulfur batteries be the next beyond-lithium ion batteries and even much better? InfoMat 4, e12359 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Fan, F. Y., Carter, W. C. & Chiang, Y. M. Mechanism and kinetics of Li2S precipitation in lithium–sulfur batteries. Adv. Mater. 27, 5203–5209 (2015).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Liu, R. et al. Establishing reaction networks in the 16-electron sulfur reduction reaction. Nature 626, 98–104 (2024).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Drvarič Talian, S. et al. Which process limits the operation of a Li–S system? Chem. Mater. 31, 9012–9023 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhang, L. et al. Revealing the electrochemical charging mechanism of nanosized Li2S by in situ and operando X-ray absorption spectroscopy. Nano Lett. 17, 5084–5091 (2017).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pan, H. et al. Non-encapsulation approach for high-performance Li–S batteries through controlled nucleation and growth. Nat. Energy 2, 813–820 (2017).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhang, T. et al. What limits the rate capability of Li–S batteries during discharge: charge transfer or mass transfer? J. Electrochem. Soc. 165, A6001–A6004 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jia, Y. et al. Variable and intelligent catalyst design based on local chemical environments in sulfur redox reactions. Joule 9, 101878 (2025).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Liu, Y. et al. Surface-localized phase mediation accelerates quasi-solid-state reaction kinetics in sulfur batteries. Nat. Chem. 17, 614–623 (2025).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Song, Y.-W. et al. Phase equilibrium thermodynamics of lithium–sulfur batteries. Nat. Chem. Eng. 1, 588–596 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bonnick, P. & Muldoon, J. The Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde of lithium sulfur batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 13, 4808–4833 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chen, H. et al. Catalytic materials for lithium–sulfur batteries: mechanisms, design strategies and future perspective. Mater. Today 52, 364–388 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Yang, Q. et al. Chlorine bridge bond-enabled binuclear copper complex for electrocatalyzing lithium–sulfur reactions. Nat. Commun. 15, 3231 (2024).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Han, Z. et al. Catalytic effect in Li–S batteries: from band theory to practical application. Mater. Today 57, 84–120 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rehman, S., Pope, M., Tao, S. & McCalla, E. Evaluating the effectiveness of in situ characterization techniques in overcoming mechanistic limitations in lithium–sulfur batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 15, 1423–1460 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Li, M. et al. In situ techniques for developing robust Li–S batteries. Small Methods 2, 1800133 (2018).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Han, Z. et al. Machine-learning-assisted design of a binary descriptor to decipher electronic and structural effects on sulfur reduction kinetics. Nat. Catal. 6, 1073–1086 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hua, W. et al. Optimizing the p charge of S in p-block metal sulfides for sulfur reduction electrocatalysis. Nat. Catal. 6, 174–184 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Shen, Z. et al. Cation-doped ZnS catalysts for polysulfide conversion in lithium–sulfur batteries. Nat. Catal. 5, 555–563 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Li, H. et al. Developing high-power Li||S batteries via transition metal/carbon nanocomposite electrocatalyst engineering. Nat. Nanotechnol. 19, 792–799 (2024).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhou, S. et al. Visualizing interfacial collective reaction behaviour of Li–S batteries. Nature 621, 75–81 (2023).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chen, Z. X. et al. Toward practical high-energy-density lithium–sulfur pouch cells: a review. Adv. Mater. 34, e2201555 (2022).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhao, C., Amine, K. & Xu, G. L. Nontraditional approaches to enable high-energy and long-life lithium–sulfur batteries. Acc. Chem. Res. 56, 2700–2712 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhou, G., Chen, H. & Cui, Y. Formulating energy density for designing practical lithium–sulfur batteries. Nat. Energy 7, 312–319 (2022).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Fan, F. Y. & Chiang, Y.-M. Electrodeposition kinetics in Li–S batteries: effects of low electrolyte/sulfur ratios and deposition surface composition. J. Electrochem. Soc. 164, A917–A922 (2017).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Peng, L. et al. A fundamental look at electrocatalytic sulfur reduction reaction. Nat. Catal. 3, 762–770 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Li, Z. et al. Lithiated metallic molybdenum disulfide nanosheets for high-performance lithium–sulfur batteries. Nat. Energy 8, 84–93 (2023).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wang, X. et al. Dense-stacking porous conjugated polymer as reactive-type host for high-performance lithium sulfur batteries. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60, 11359–11369 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhang, X.-Q., Tang, S. & Fu, Y.-Z. Recent advances of functional electrolyte additives for lithium–sulfur batteries. J. Electrochem. 29, 2217005 (2023).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Li, X. Y. et al. Kinetic evaluation on lithium polysulfide in weakly solvating electrolyte toward practical lithium–sulfur batteries. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 146, 14754–14764 (2024).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Yang, Q. et al. Integrated design of homogeneous/heterogeneous copper complex catalysts to enable synergistic effects on sulfur and lithium evolution reactions. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 64, e202415078 (2025).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chen, Z. X. et al. Cathode kinetics evaluation in lean-electrolyte lithium–sulfur batteries. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 145, 16449–16457 (2023).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cowley, J. M. & Moodie, A. F. The scattering of electrons by atoms and crystals. I. A new theoretical approach. Acta Crystallogr. 10, 609–619 (1957).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Goodman, P. & Moodie, A. F. Numerical evaluations of N-beam wave functions in electron scattering by the multi-slice method. Acta Crystallogr. A30, 280–290 (1974).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169–11186 (1996).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Blöchl, P. E. Projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953–17979 (1994).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kresse, G. & Joubert, D. From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758–1775 (1999).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ernzerhof, M. & Scuseria, G. E. Assessment of the Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof exchange-correlation functional. J. Chem. Phys. 110, 5029–5036 (1999).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Grimme, S., Ehrlich, S. & Goerigk, L. Effect of the damping function in dispersion corrected density functional theory. J. Comput. Chem. 32, 1456–1465 (2011).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • RELATED ARTICLES

    Most Popular

    Recent Comments