Jumper, J. et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 596, 583–589 (2021).
Opulente, D. A. et al. Genomic factors shape carbon and nitrogen metabolic niche breadth across Saccharomycotina yeasts. Science 384, eadj4503 (2024).
Jeong, H., Tombor, B., Albert, R., Oltvai, Z. N. & Barabási, A.-L. The large-scale organization of metabolic networks. Nature 407, 651–654 (2000).
Noda-Garcia, L., Liebermeister, W. & Tawfik, D. S. Metabolite–enzyme coevolution: from single enzymes to metabolic pathways and networks. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 87, 187–216 (2018).
Ribeiro, A. J. M., Riziotis, I. G., Borkakoti, N. & Thornton, J. M. Enzyme function and evolution through the lens of bioinformatics. Biochem. J 480, 1845–1863 (2023).
Pavlova, N. N. & Thompson, C. B. The emerging hallmarks of cancer metabolism. Cell Metab. 23, 27–47 (2016).
Stine, Z. E., Schug, Z. T., Salvino, J. M. & Dang, C. V. Targeting cancer metabolism in the era of precision oncology. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 21, 141–162 (2022).
Porter, J. L., Rusli, R. A. & Ollis, D. L. Directed evolution of enzymes for industrial biocatalysis. ChemBioChem 17, 197–203 (2016).
Breen, M. S., Kemena, C., Vlasov, P. K., Notredame, C. & Kondrashov, F. A. Epistasis as the primary factor in molecular evolution. Nature 490, 535–538 (2012).
Suárez-Díaz, E. Molecular evolution in historical perspective. J. Mol. Evol. 83, 204–213 (2016).
Zuckerkandl, E. & Pauling, L. Molecules as documents of evolutionary history. J. Theor. Biol. 8, 357–366 (1965).
Chen, Y. & Nielsen, J. Yeast has evolved to minimize protein resource cost for synthesizing amino acids. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2114622119 (2022).
Nilsson, A. & Nielsen, J. Metabolic trade-offs in yeast are caused by F1F0-ATP synthase. Sci. Rep. 6, 22264 (2016).
Akashi, H. & Gojobori, T. Metabolic efficiency and amino acid composition in the proteomes of Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 3695–3700 (2002).
Barton, M. D., Delneri, D., Oliver, S. G., Rattray, M. & Bergman, C. M. Evolutionary systems biology of amino acid biosynthetic cost in yeast. PLoS ONE 5, e11935 (2010).
Raiford, D. W. et al. Do amino acid biosynthetic costs constrain protein evolution in Saccharomyces cerevisiae? J. Mol. Evol. 67, 621–630 (2008).
Kurtzman, C., Fell, J. W. & Boekhout, T. The Yeasts: A Taxonomic Study (Elsevier, 2011).
Lu, H. et al. Yeast metabolic innovations emerged via expanded metabolic network and gene positive selection. Mol. Syst. Biol. 17, e10427 (2021).
Shen, X.-X. et al. Tempo and mode of genome evolution in the budding yeast subphylum. Cell 175, 1533–1545 (2018).
Wu, J. et al. Yeast diversity in relation to the production of fuels and chemicals. Sci. Rep. 7, 14259 (2017).
Varadi, M. et al. AlphaFold protein structure database: massively expanding the structural coverage of protein-sequence space with high-accuracy models. Nucleic Acids Res. 50, D439–D444 (2022).
Guo, H.-B. et al. AlphaFold2 models indicate that protein sequence determines both structure and dynamics. Sci. Rep. 12, 10696 (2022).
Mariani, V., Biasini, M., Barbato, A. & Schwede, T. lDDT: a local superposition-free score for comparing protein structures and models using distance difference tests. Bioinformatics 29, 2722–2728 (2013).
Zhang, Y. & Skolnick, J. TM-align: a protein structure alignment algorithm based on the TM-score. Nucleic Acids Res. 33, 2302–2309 (2005).
Meng, E. C., Pettersen, E. F., Couch, G. S., Huang, C. C. & Ferrin, T. E. Tools for integrated sequence-structure analysis with UCSF Chimera. BMC Bioinform. 7, 339 (2006).
Opulente, D. A. et al. Factors driving metabolic diversity in the budding yeast subphylum. BMC Biol. 16, 26 (2018).
Oss, S. B. V. et al. On the illusion of auxotrophy: met15Δ yeast cells can grow on inorganic sulfur, thanks to the previously uncharacterized homocysteine synthase Yll058w. J. Biol. Chem. 298, 102697 (2022).
Yu, J. S. L. et al. Inorganic sulfur fixation via a new homocysteine synthase allows yeast cells to cooperatively compensate for methionine auxotrophy. PLoS Biol. 20, e3001912 (2022).
Alam, M. T. et al. The self-inhibitory nature of metabolic networks and its alleviation through compartmentalization. Nat. Commun. 8, 16018 (2017).
Bédard, C., Cisneros, A. F., Jordan, D. & Landry, C. R. Correlation between protein abundance and sequence conservation: what do recent experiments say? Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 77, 101984 (2022).
Mata, J. & Bahler, J. Correlations between gene expression and gene conservation in fission yeast. Genome Res. 13, 2686–2690 (2003).
Li, F. et al. Deep learning-based kcat prediction enables improved enzyme-constrained model reconstruction. Nat. Catal. 5, 662–672 (2022).
Perli, T., Wronska, A. K., Ortiz‐Merino, R. A., Pronk, J. T. & Daran, J. Vitamin requirements and biosynthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 37, 283–304 (2020).
Craig, C. L. & Weber, R. S. Selection costs of amino acid substitutions in ColE1 and ColIa gene clusters harbored by Escherichia coli. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15, 774–776 (1998).
Seligmann, H. Cost-minimization of amino acid usage. J. Mol. Evol. 56, 151–161 (2003).
Wagner, A. Energy constraints on the evolution of gene expression. Mol. Biol. Evol. 22, 1365–1374 (2005).
Shrake, A. & Rupley, J. A. Environment and exposure to solvent of protein atoms. Lysozyme and insulin. J. Mol. Biol. 79, 351–371 (1973).
White, M. E. H., Gil, J. & Tate, E. W. Proteome-wide structural analysis identifies warhead- and coverage-specific biases in cysteine-focused chemoproteomics. Cell Chem. Biol. 30, 828–838 (2023).
Stevens, A. O. & He, Y. Benchmarking the accuracy of AlphaFold2 in loop structure prediction. Biomolecules 12, 985 (2022).
Lau, A. M. et al. Exploring structural diversity across the protein universe with The Encyclopedia of Domains. Science 386, eadq4946 (2024).
Álvarez-Carretero, S., Kapli, P. & Yang, Z. Beginner’s guide on the use of PAML to detect positive selection. Mol. Biol. Evol. 40, msad041 (2023).
Yang, Z., Wong, W. S. W. & Nielsen, R. Bayes empirical Bayes inference of amino acid sites under positive selection. Mol. Biol. Evol. 22, 1107–1118 (2005).
Zhang, J., Nielsen, R. & Yang, Z. Evaluation of an improved branch-site likelihood method for detecting positive selection at the molecular level. Mol. Biol. Evol. 22, 2472–2479 (2005).
Benschop, J. J. et al. A consensus of core protein complex compositions for Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell 38, 916–928 (2010).
Ralser, M., Varma, S. J. & Notebaart, R. A. The evolution of the metabolic network over long timelines. Curr. Opin. Syst. Biol. 28, 100402 (2021).
Keller, M. A. et al. Conditional iron and pH-dependent activity of a non-enzymatic glycolysis and pentose phosphate pathway. Sci. Adv. 2, e1501235 (2016).
Muchowska, K. B., Varma, S. J. & Moran, J. Nonenzymatic metabolic reactions and life’s origins. Chem. Rev. 120, 7708–7744 (2020).
Aulakh, S. K. et al. The molecular landscape of cellular metal ion biology. Cell Syst. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cels.2025.101319 (2025).
Ng, C. Y., Wang, L., Chowdhury, A. & Maranas, C. D. Pareto optimality explanation of the glycolytic alternatives in nature. Sci. Rep. 9, 2633 (2019).
Clifton, B. E. et al. Evolution of cyclohexadienyl dehydratase from an ancestral solute-binding protein. Nat. Chem. Biol. 14, 542–547 (2018).
Nicoll, C. R. et al. Ancestral-sequence reconstruction unveils the structural basis of function in mammalian FMOs. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 27, 14–24 (2020).
Voordeckers, K. et al. Reconstruction of ancestral metabolic enzymes reveals molecular mechanisms underlying evolutionary innovation through gene duplication. PLoS Biol. 10, e1001446 (2012).
Barrio-Hernandez, I. et al. Clustering-predicted structures at the scale of the known protein universe. Nature 622, 637–645 (2023).
Blum, M. et al. InterPro: the protein sequence classification resource in 2025. Nucleic Acids Res. 53, D444–D456 (2025).
Copley, S. D. Evolution of new enzymes by gene duplication and divergence. FEBS J. 287, 1262–1283 (2020).
Durairaj, J. et al. Uncovering new families and folds in the natural protein universe. Nature 622, 646–653 (2023).
Terwilliger, T. C. et al. AlphaFold predictions are valuable hypotheses and accelerate but do not replace experimental structure determination. Nat. Methods 21, 110–116 (2024).
Di Bartolomeo, F. et al. Absolute yeast mitochondrial proteome quantification reveals trade-off between biosynthesis and energy generation during diauxic shift. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 7524–7535 (2020).
Stincone, A. et al. The return of metabolism: biochemistry and physiology of the pentose phosphate pathway. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 90, 927–963 (2015).
Hoyos, P., Hernáiz, M. J. & Alcántara, A. R. in Comprehensive Biotechnology 3rd edn (ed. Moo-Young, M.) 334–373 (Pergamon, 2017).
Lemke, O. et al. The role of metabolism in shaping enzyme structures over 400 million years. Figshare https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.29117966 (2025).
