Bower, G. & Kvon, E. Z. Genetic factors mediating long-range enhancer-promoter communication in mammalian development. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 90, 102282 (2024).
Lettice, L. A. et al. Disruption of a long-range cis-acting regulator for Shh causes preaxial polydactyly. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 7548–7553 (2002).
Serebreni, L. & Stark, A. Insights into gene regulation: from regulatory genomic elements to DNA-protein and protein-protein interactions. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 70, 58–66 (2021).
Spitz, F. & Furlong, E. E. M. Transcription factors: from enhancer binding to developmental control. Nat. Rev. Genet. 13, 613–626 (2012).
Field, A. & Adelman, K. Evaluating enhancer function and transcription. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 89, 212–234 (2020).
Kim, S. & Wysocka, J. Deciphering the multi-scale, quantitative cis-regulatory code. Mol. Cell 83, 373–392 (2023).
Nair, S. J. et al. Transcriptional enhancers at 40: evolution of a viral DNA element to nuclear architectural structures. Trends Genet. 38, 1019–1047 (2022).
Long, H. K. et al. Loss of extreme long-range enhancers in human neural crest drives a craniofacial disorder. Cell Stem Cell 27, 765–783 (2020).
Padhi, E. M. et al. Coding and noncoding variants in EBF3 are involved in HADDS and simplex autism. Hum. Genomics 15, 44 (2021).
Yanchus, C. et al. A noncoding single-nucleotide polymorphism at 8q24 drives IDH1-mutant glioma formation. Science 378, 68–78 (2022).
Lupiáñez, D. G. et al. Disruptions of topological chromatin domains cause pathogenic rewiring of gene-enhancer interactions. Cell 161, 1012–1025 (2015).
Northcott, P. A. et al. Enhancer hijacking activates GFI1 family oncogenes in medulloblastoma. Nature 511, 428–434 (2014).
Zaugg, J. B. et al. Current challenges in understanding the role of enhancers in disease. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 29, 1148–1158 (2022).
Weischenfeldt, J. & Ibrahim, D. M. When 3D genome changes cause disease: the impact of structural variations in congenital disease and cancer. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 80, 102048 (2023).
Hafner, A. & Boettiger, A. The spatial organization of transcriptional control. Nat. Rev. Genet. 24, 53–68 (2023).
Robson, M. I., Ringel, A. R. & Mundlos, S. Regulatory landscaping: how enhancer-promoter communication is sculpted in 3D. Mol. Cell 74, 1110–1122 (2019).
Schoenfelder, S. & Fraser, P. Long-range enhancer–promoter contacts in gene expression control. Nat. Rev. Genet. 20, 437–455 (2019).
Dixon, J. R. et al. Topological domains in mammalian genomes identified by analysis of chromatin interactions. Nature 485, 376–380 (2012).
Nora, E. P. et al. Spatial partitioning of the regulatory landscape of the X-inactivation centre. Nature 485, 381–385 (2012).
Oudelaar, A. M. & Higgs, D. R. The relationship between genome structure and function. Nat. Rev. Genet. 22, 154–168 (2021).
Hsieh, T.-H. S. et al. Enhancer–promoter interactions and transcription are largely maintained upon acute loss of CTCF, cohesin, WAPL or YY1. Nat. Genet. 54, 1919–1932 (2022).
Schwarzer, W. et al. Two independent modes of chromatin organization revealed by cohesin removal. Nature 551, 51–56 (2017).
Nora, E. P. et al. Targeted degradation of CTCf decouples local insulation of chromosome domains from genomic compartmentalization. Cell 169, 930–944 (2017).
Rao, S. S. P. et al. Cohesin loss eliminates all loop domains. Cell 171, 305–320 (2017).
Wutz, G. et al. Topologically associating domains and chromatin loops depend on cohesin and are regulated by CTCF, WAPL, and PDS5 proteins. EMBO J. 36, 3573–3599 (2017).
Ghavi-Helm, Y. et al. Highly rearranged chromosomes reveal uncoupling between genome topology and gene expression. Nat. Genet. 51, 1272–1282 (2019).
Williamson, I. et al. Developmentally regulated Shh expression is robust to TAD perturbations. Development 146, dev179523 (2019).
Paliou, C. et al. Preformed chromatin topology assists transcriptional robustness of Shh during limb development. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 12390–12399 (2019).
Despang, A. et al. Functional dissection of the Sox9–Kcnj2 locus identifies nonessential and instructive roles of TAD architecture. Nat. Genet. 51, 1263–1271 (2019).
Ushiki, A. et al. Deletion of CTCF sites in the SHH locus alters enhancer-promoter interactions and leads to acheiropodia. Nat. Commun. 12, 2282 (2021).
Rodríguez-Carballo, E. et al. The HoxD cluster is a dynamic and resilient TAD boundary controlling the segregation of antagonistic regulatory landscapes. Genes Dev. 31, 2264–2281 (2017).
Furlong, E. E. M. & Levine, M. Developmental enhancers and chromosome topology. Science 361, 1341–1345 (2018).
Sagai, T., Hosoya, M., Mizushina, Y., Tamura, M. & Shiroishi, T. Elimination of a long-range cis-regulatory module causes complete loss of limb-specific Shh expression and truncation of the mouse limb. Development 132, 797–803 (2005).
Martin, D. I. & Whitelaw, E. The vagaries of variegating transgenes. Bioessays 18, 919–923 (1996).
Haruyama, N., Cho, A. & Kulkarni, A. B. Overview: engineering transgenic constructs and mice. Curr. Protoc. Cell Biol. 42, 19.10.1–19.10.9 (2009).
Zabidi, M. A. et al. Enhancer-core-promoter specificity separates developmental and housekeeping gene regulation. Nature 518, 556–559 (2015).
Butler, J. E. & Kadonaga, J. T. Enhancer-promoter specificity mediated by DPE or TATA core promoter motifs. Genes Dev. 15, 2515–2519 (2001).
Snetkova, V. et al. Ultraconserved enhancer function does not require perfect sequence conservation. Nat. Genet. 53, 521–528 (2021).
Osterwalder, M. et al. Characterization of mammalian in vivo enhancers using mouse transgenesis and CRISPR genome editing. Methods Mol. Biol. 2403, 147–186 (2022).
Kvon, E. Z. et al. Comprehensive in vivo interrogation reveals phenotypic impact of human enhancer variants. Cell 180, 1262–1271 (2020).
Lettice, L. A. et al. A long-range Shh enhancer regulates expression in the developing limb and fin and is associated with preaxial polydactyly. Hum. Mol. Genet. 12, 1725–1735 (2003).
Lettice, L. A., Hill, A. E., Devenney, P. S. & Hill, R. E. Point mutations in a distant sonic hedgehog cis-regulator generate a variable regulatory output responsible for preaxial polydactyly. Hum. Mol. Genet. 17, 978–985 (2008).
Kosicki, M. et al. VISTA Enhancer browser: an updated database of tissue-specific developmental enhancers. Nucleic Acids Res. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkae940 (2024).
Hollingsworth, E. W. et al. Rapid and quantitative functional interrogation of human enhancer variant activity in live mice. Nat. Commun. 16, 409 (2025).
Lettice, L. A. et al. Opposing functions of the ETS factor family define Shh spatial expression in limb buds and underlie polydactyly. Dev. Cell 22, 459–467 (2012).
Rinzema, N. J. et al. Building regulatory landscapes reveals that an enhancer can recruit cohesin to create contact domains, engage CTCF sites and activate distant genes. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 29, 563–574 (2022).
Zuin, J. et al. Nonlinear control of transcription through enhancer-promoter interactions. Nature 604, 571–577 (2022).
Dillon, N., Trimborn, T., Strouboulis, J., Fraser, P. & Grosveld, F. The effect of distance on long-range chromatin interactions. Mol. Cell 1, 131–139 (1997).
Calhoun, V. C., Stathopoulos, A. & Levine, M. Promoter-proximal tethering elements regulate enhancer-promoter specificity in the Drosophila antennapedia complex. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 9243–9247 (2002).
Calhoun, V. C. & Levine, M. Long-range enhancer–promoter interactions in the Scr-Antp interval of the Drosophila antennapedia complex. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 9878–9883 (2003).
Levo, M. et al. Transcriptional coupling of distant regulatory genes in living embryos. Nature 605, 754–760 (2022).
Swanson, C. I., Evans, N. C. & Barolo, S. Structural rules and complex regulatory circuitry constrain expression of a notch- and EGFR-regulated eye enhancer. Dev. Cell 18, 359–370 (2010).
Kubo, N. et al. Promoter-proximal CTCF binding promotes distal enhancer-dependent gene activation. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 28, 152–161 (2021).
Kang, J., Kim, Y. W., Park, S., Kang, Y. & Kim, A. Multiple CTCF sites cooperate with each other to maintain a TAD for enhancer-promoter interaction in the β-globin locus. FASEB J. 35, e21768 (2021).
Oh, S. et al. Enhancer release and retargeting activates disease-susceptibility genes. Nature 595, 735–740 (2021).
Hirsch, N. et al. HDAC9 structural variants disrupting TWIST1 transcriptional regulation lead to craniofacial and limb malformations. Genome Res. 32, 1242–1253 (2022).
Chen, L.-F. et al. Structural elements promote architectural stripe formation and facilitate ultra-long-range gene regulation at a human disease locus. Mol. Cell 83, 1446–1461 (2023).
Pachano, T. et al. Orphan CpG islands amplify poised enhancer regulatory activity and determine target gene responsiveness. Nat. Genet. 53, 1036–1049 (2021).
Brosh, R. et al. Synthetic regulatory genomics uncovers enhancer context dependence at the Sox2 locus. Mol. Cell https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2023.02.027 (2023).
Blayney, J. W. et al. Super-enhancers include classical enhancers and facilitators to fully activate gene expression. Cell 186, 5826–5839 (2023).
Tzchori, I. et al. LIM homeobox transcription factors integrate signaling events that control three-dimensional limb patterning and growth. Development 136, 1375–1385 (2009).
Watson, B. A. et al. LHX2 mediates the FGF-to-SHH regulatory loop during limb development. J. Dev. Biol. 6, 13 (2018).
Liu, G. & Dean, A. Enhancer long-range contacts: the multi-adaptor protein LDB1 is the tie that binds. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1862, 625–633 (2019).
Monahan, K., Horta, A. & Lomvardas, S. LHX2- and LDB1-mediated trans interactions regulate olfactory receptor choice. Nature 565, 448–453 (2019).
Krivega, I., Dale, R. K. & Dean, A. Role of LDB1 in the transition from chromatin looping to transcription activation. Genes Dev. 28, 1278–1290 (2014).
Deng, W. et al. Controlling long-range genomic interactions at a native locus by targeted tethering of a looping factor. Cell 149, 1233–1244 (2012).
Chandrashekar, H. et al. A multi-looping chromatin signature predicts dysregulated gene expression in neurons with familial Alzheimer’s disease mutations. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.27.582395 (2024).
Aboreden, N. G. et al. LDB1 establishes multi-enhancer networks to regulate gene expression. Mol. Cell 85, 376–393 (2025).
Lex, R. K. et al. GLI transcriptional repression regulates tissue-specific enhancer activity in response to Hedgehog signaling. eLife 9, e50670 (2020).
Lettice, L. A., Devenney, P., Angelis, C. D. & Hill, R. E. The conserved sonic hedgehog limb enhancer consists of discrete functional elements that regulate precise spatial expression. Cell Rep. 20, 1396–1408 (2017).
Chen, Z. et al. Increased enhancer-promoter interactions during developmental enhancer activation in mammals. Nat. Genet. 56, 675–685 (2024).
Kvon, E. Z. et al. Progressive loss of function in a limb enhancer during snake evolution. Cell 167, 633–642 (2016).
Dickel, D. E., Visel, A. & Pennacchio, L. A. Functional anatomy of distant-acting mammalian enhancers. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 368, 20120359 (2013).
Osterwalder, M. et al. HAND2 targets define a network of transcriptional regulators that compartmentalize the early limb bud mesenchyme. Dev. Cell 31, 345–357 (2014).
Kothary, R. et al. Inducible expression of an hsp68-lacZ hybrid gene in transgenic mice. Development 105, 707–714 (1989).
Pennacchio, L. A. et al. In vivo enhancer analysis of human conserved non-coding sequences. Nature 444, 499–502 (2006).
Rigueur, D. & Lyons, K. M. Whole-mount skeletal staining. Methods Mol. Biol. 1130, 113–121 (2014).
Buenrostro, J. D., Giresi, P. G., Zaba, L. C., Chang, H. Y. & Greenleaf, W. J. Transposition of native chromatin for fast and sensitive epigenomic profiling of open chromatin, DNA-binding proteins and nucleosome position. Nat. Methods 10, 1213–1218 (2013).
Buenrostro, J. D., Wu, B., Chang, H. Y. & Greenleaf, W. J. ATAC‐seq: a method for assaying chromatin accessibility genome‐wide. Curr. Protoc. Mol. Biol. 109, 21.29.1–21.29.9 (2015).
Corces, M. R. et al. An improved ATAC-seq protocol reduces background and enables interrogation of frozen tissues. Nat. Methods 14, 959–962 (2017).
Quinlan, A. R. & Hall, I. M. BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics 26, 841–842 (2010).
Satpathy, A. T. et al. Massively parallel single-cell chromatin landscapes of human immune cell development and intratumoral T cell exhaustion. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 925–936 (2019).
Stuart, T., Srivastava, A., Madad, S., Lareau, C. A. & Satija, R. Single-cell chromatin state analysis with Signac. Nat. Methods 18, 1333–1341 (2021).
Zhang, Y. et al. Model-based Analysis of ChIP-Seq (MACS). Genome Biol. 9, R137 (2008).
Desanlis, I., Paul, R. & Kmita, M. Transcriptional trajectories in mouse limb buds reveal the transition from anterior-posterior to proximal-distal patterning at early limb bud stage. J. Dev. Biol. 8, 31 (2020).
Shimizu, H. et al. The AERO system: a 3D-like approach for recording gene expression patterns in the whole mouse embryo. PLoS ONE 8, e75754 (2013).
Groza, T. et al. The International Mouse Phenotyping Consortium: comprehensive knockout phenotyping underpinning the study of human disease. Nucleic Acids Res. 51, D1038–D1045 (2023).
Nishinakamura, R. et al. Murine homolog of SALL1 is essential for ureteric bud invasion in kidney development. Development 128, 3105–3115 (2001).
Monti, R. et al. Limb-Enhancer Genie: an accessible resource of accurate enhancer predictions in the developing limb. PLoS Comput. Biol. 13, e1005720 (2017).
Heinz, S. et al. Simple combinations of lineage-determining transcription factors prime cis-regulatory elements required for macrophage and B cell identities. Mol. Cell 38, 576–589 (2010).
Castro-Mondragon, J. A. et al. JASPAR 2022: the 9th release of the open-access database of transcription factor binding profiles. Nucleic Acids Res. 50, D165–D173 (2022).
Puigdevall, P. & Castelo, R. GenomicScores: seamless access to genomewide position-specific scores from R and Bioconductor. Bioinformatics 34, 3208–3210 (2018).
Karolchik, D. et al. The UCSC Table Browser data retrieval tool. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, D493–D496 (2004).
Grant, C. E., Bailey, T. L. & Noble, W. S. FIMO: scanning for occurrences of a given motif. Bioinformatics 27, 1017–1018 (2011).
Schindelin, J. et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 676–682 (2012).
Jiang, Y. et al. The methyltransferase SETDB1 regulates a large neuron-specific topological chromatin domain. Nat. Genet. 49, 1239–1250 (2017).
Andrey, G. et al. Characterization of hundreds of regulatory landscapes in developing limbs reveals two regimes of chromatin folding. Genome Res. 27, 223–233 (2017).
