Shibata, A. & Jeggo, P. A historical reflection on our understanding of radiation-induced DNA double strand break repair in somatic mammalian cells; interfacing the past with the present. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 95, 945–956 (2019).
Stinson, B. M. & Loparo, J. J. Repair of DNA double-strand breaks by the nonhomologous end joining pathway. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 90, 137–164 (2021).
Arter, M. & Keeney, S. Divergence and conservation of the meiotic recombination machinery. Nat. Rev. Genet. 25, 309–325 (2024).
Christie, S. M., Fijen, C. & Rothenberg, E. V(D)J recombination: recent insights in formation of the recombinase complex and recruitment of DNA repair machinery. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 10, 886718 (2022).
Wang, X. S., Lee, B. J. & Zha, S. The recent advances in non-homologous end-joining through the lens of lymphocyte development. DNA Repair 94, 102874 (2020).
Wang, J. Y. & Doudna, J. A. CRISPR technology: a decade of genome editing is only the beginning. Science 379, eadd8643 (2023).
Jasin, M. & Haber, J. E. The democratization of gene editing: insights from site-specific cleavage and double-strand break repair. DNA Repair 44, 6–16 (2016).
Bossaert, M. et al. Identification of the main barriers to Ku accumulation in chromatin. Cell Rep. 43, 114538 (2024).
Williams, G. J. et al. Structural insights into NHEJ: building up an integrated picture of the dynamic DSB repair super complex, one component and interaction at a time. DNA Repair 17, 110–120 (2014).
Woodbine, L., Gennery, A. R. & Jeggo, P. A. The clinical impact of deficiency in DNA non-homologous end-joining. DNA Repair 16, 84–96 (2014).
Pryor, J. M. et al. Essential role for polymerase specialization in cellular nonhomologous end joining. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, E4537–E4545 (2015).
Sallmyr, A., Rashid, I., Bhandari, S. K., Naila, T. & Tomkinson, A. E. Human DNA ligases in replication and repair. DNA Repair 93, 102908 (2020).
Grawunder, U. et al. Activity of DNA ligase IV stimulated by complex formation with XRCC4 protein in mammalian cells. Nature 388, 492–495 (1997).
Critchlow, S. E., Bowater, R. P. & Jackson, S. P. Mammalian DNA double-strand break repair protein XRCC4 interacts with DNA ligase IV. Curr. Biol. 7, 588–598 (1997).
Junop, M. S. et al. Crystal structure of the Xrcc4 DNA repair protein and implications for end joining. EMBO J. 19, 5962–5970 (2000).
Sibanda, B. L. et al. Crystal structure of an Xrcc4-DNA ligase IV complex. Nat. Struct. Biol. 8, 1015–1019 (2001).
Wu, P. Y. et al. Structural and functional interaction between the human DNA repair proteins DNA ligase IV and XRCC4. Mol. Cell. Biol. 29, 3163–3172 (2009).
Walker, J. R., Corpina, R. A. & Goldberg, J. Structure of the Ku heterodimer bound to DNA and its implications for double-strand break repair. Nature 412, 607–614 (2001).
Graham, T. G. W., Carney, S. M., Walter, J. C. & Loparo, J. J. A single XLF dimer bridges DNA ends during nonhomologous end joining. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 25, 877–884 (2018).
Nemoz, C. et al. XLF and APLF bind Ku80 at two remote sites to ensure DNA repair by non-homologous end joining. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 25, 971–980 (2018).
Ochi, T. et al. DNA repair. PAXX, a paralog of XRCC4 and XLF, interacts with Ku to promote DNA double-strand break repair. Science 347, 185–188 (2015).
Seif-El-Dahan, M. et al. PAXX binding to the NHEJ machinery explains functional redundancy with XLF. Sci. Adv. 9, eadg2834 (2023).
Chen, S. et al. Structural basis of long-range to short-range synaptic transition in NHEJ. Nature 593, 294–298 (2021).
Buck, D. et al. Cernunnos, a novel nonhomologous end-joining factor, is mutated in human immunodeficiency with microcephaly. Cell 124, 287–299 (2006).
Balmus, G. et al. Synthetic lethality between PAXX and XLF in mammalian development. Genes Dev. 30, 2152–2157 (2016).
Lescale, C. et al. Specific roles of XRCC4 paralogs PAXX and XLF during V(D)J recombination. Cell Rep. 16, 2967–2979 (2016).
Liu, X., Shao, Z., Jiang, W., Lee, B. J. & Zha, S. PAXX promotes KU accumulation at DNA breaks and is essential for end-joining in XLF-deficient mice. Nat. Commun. 8, 13816 (2017).
Moon, A. F. et al. Sustained active site rigidity during synthesis by human DNA polymerase mu. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 21, 253–260 (2014).
Kaminski, A. M. et al. Structures of DNA-bound human ligase IV catalytic core reveal insights into substrate binding and catalysis. Nat. Commun. 9, 2642 (2018).
Stinson, B. M., Carney, S. M., Walter, J. C. & Loparo, J. J. Structural role for DNA ligase IV in promoting the fidelity of non-homologous end joining. Nat. Commun. 15, 1250 (2024).
Zhao, B., Rothenberg, E., Ramsden, D. A. & Lieber, M. R. The molecular basis and disease relevance of non-homologous DNA end joining. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 21, 765–781 (2020).
Riballo, E. et al. XLF-Cernunnos promotes DNA ligase IV-XRCC4 re-adenylation following ligation. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, 482–492 (2009).
Ropars, V. et al. Structural characterization of filaments formed by human Xrcc4-Cernunnos/XLF complex involved in nonhomologous DNA end-joining. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 12663–12668 (2011).
Hammel, M. et al. XRCC4 protein interactions with XRCC4-like factor (XLF) create an extended grooved scaffold for DNA ligation and double strand break repair. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 32638–32650 (2011).
Chen, S. et al. Cryo-EM visualization of DNA-PKcs structural intermediates in NHEJ. Sci. Adv. 9, eadg2838 (2023).
Cottarel, J. et al. A noncatalytic function of the ligation complex during nonhomologous end joining. J. Cell Biol. 200, 173–186 (2013).
Graham, T. G., Walter, J. C. & Loparo, J. J. Two-stage synapsis of DNA ends during non-homologous end joining. Mol. Cell 61, 850–858 (2016).
Goff, N. J. et al. Catalytically inactive DNA ligase IV promotes DNA repair in living cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 50, 11058–11071 (2022).
Waters, C. A. et al. The fidelity of the ligation step determines how ends are resolved during nonhomologous end joining. Nat. Commun. 5, 4286 (2014).
Kaminski, A. M. et al. DNA polymerase lambda Loop1 variant yields unexpected gain-of-function capabilities in nonhomologous end-joining. DNA Repair 136, 103645 (2024).
Loc’h, J. & Delarue, M. Terminal deoxynucleotidyltransferase: the story of an untemplated DNA polymerase capable of DNA bridging and templated synthesis across strands. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 53, 22–31 (2018).
Ochi, T., Gu, X. & Blundell, T. L. Structure of the catalytic region of DNA ligase IV in complex with an Artemis fragment sheds light on double-strand break repair. Structure 21, 672–679 (2013).
Pascal, J. M., O’Brien, P. J., Tomkinson, A. E. & Ellenberger, T. Human DNA ligase I completely encircles and partially unwinds nicked DNA. Nature 432, 473–478 (2004).
Cotner-Gohara, E. et al. Human DNA ligase III recognizes DNA ends by dynamic switching between two DNA-bound states. Biochemistry 49, 6165–6176 (2010).
Conlin, M. P. et al. DNA ligase IV guides end-processing choice during nonhomologous end joining. Cell Rep 20, 2810–2819 (2017).
De Ioannes, P., Malu, S., Cortes, P. & Aggarwal, A. K. Structural basis of DNA ligase IV–Artemis interaction in nonhomologous end-joining. Cell Rep. 2, 1505–1512 (2012).
Malu, S. et al. Artemis C-terminal region facilitates V(D)J recombination through its interactions with DNA ligase IV and DNA-PKcs. J. Exp. Med. 209, 955–963 (2012).
DeRose, E. F. et al. Solution structure of polymerase mu’s BRCT domain reveals an element essential for its role in nonhomologous end joining. Biochemistry 46, 12100–12110 (2007).
Mueller, G. A. et al. A comparison of BRCT domains involved in nonhomologous end-joining: introducing the solution structure of the BRCT domain of polymerase lambda. DNA Repair 7, 1340–1351 (2008).
Williams, R. S., Lee, M. S., Hau, D. D. & Glover, J. N. Structural basis of phosphopeptide recognition by the BRCT domain of BRCA1. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 11, 519–525 (2004).
Chen, X. et al. Structure of an activated DNA-PK and its implications for NHEJ. Mol. Cell 81, 801–810.e803 (2021).
Liu, L. et al. Autophosphorylation transforms DNA-PK from protecting to processing DNA ends. Mol. Cell 82, 177–189.e174 (2022).
Tadi, S. K. et al. PAXX is an accessory c-NHEJ factor that associates with Ku70 and has overlapping functions with XLF. Cell Rep 17, 541–555 (2016).
Xing, M. et al. Interactome analysis identifies a new paralogue of XRCC4 in non-homologous end joining DNA repair pathway. Nat. Commun. 6, 6233 (2015).
Cisneros-Aguirre, M., Lopezcolorado, F. W., Ping, X., Chen, R. & Stark, J. M. Distinct functions of PAXX and MRI during chromosomal end joining. iScience https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2025.112722 (2025).
Buehl, C. J. et al. Two distinct long-range synaptic complexes promote different aspects of end processing prior to repair of DNA breaks by non-homologous end joining. Mol. Cell 83, 698–714 e694 (2023).
Matsumoto, Y. et al. Development and evolution of DNA-dependent protein kinase inhibitors toward cancer therapy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23, 4264 (2022).
Denes, C. E. et al. Approaches to enhance precise CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22, 8571 (2021).
Shao, Z. et al. DNA-PKcs has KU-dependent function in rRNA processing and haematopoiesis. Nature 579, 291–296 (2020).
Greco, G. E. et al. SCR7 is neither a selective nor a potent inhibitor of human DNA ligase IV. DNA Repair 43, 18–23 (2016).
Yang, W. & Gao, Y. Translesion and repair DNA polymerases: diverse structure and mechanism. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 87, 239–261 (2018).
Cisneros-Aguirre, M., Lopezcolorado, F. W., Tsai, L. J., Bhargava, R. & Stark, J. M. The importance of DNAPKcs for blunt DNA end joining is magnified when XLF is weakened. Nat. Commun. 13, 3662 (2022).
Schorb, M., Haberbosch, I., Hagen, W. J. H., Schwab, Y. & Mastronarde, D. N. Software tools for automated transmission electron microscopy. Nat. Methods 16, 471–477 (2019).
Fernandez-Leiro, R. & Scheres, S. H. W. A pipeline approach to single-particle processing in RELION. Acta Crystallogr. D Struct. Biol. 73, 496–502 (2017).
Zheng, S. Q. et al. MotionCor2: anisotropic correction of beam-induced motion for improved cryo-electron microscopy. Nat. Methods 14, 331–332 (2017).
Rohou, A. & Grigorieff, N. CTFFIND4: fast and accurate defocus estimation from electron micrographs. J. Struct. Biol. 192, 216–221 (2015).
Adams, P. D. et al. PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 213–221 (2010).
Sanchez-Garcia, R. et al. DeepEMhancer: a deep learning solution for cryo-EM volume post-processing. Commun. Biol. 4, 874 (2021).
Rosenthal, P. B. & Henderson, R. Optimal determination of particle orientation, absolute hand, and contrast loss in single-particle electron cryomicroscopy. J. Mol. Biol. 333, 721–745 (2003).
Emsley, P., Lohkamp, B., Scott, W. G. & Cowtan, K. Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 486–501 (2010).
Pettersen, E. F. et al. UCSF ChimeraX: structure visualization for researchers, educators, and developers. Protein Sci. 30, 70–82 (2021).
Chen, V. B. et al. MolProbity: all-atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 12–21 (2010).
