Lee, T. I. & Young, R. A. Transcriptional regulation and its misregulation in disease. Cell 152, 1237–1251 (2013).
Lambert, S. A. et al. The human transcription factors. Cell 172, 650–665 (2018).
Hahn, S. & Young, E. T. Transcriptional regulation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: transcription factor regulation and function, mechanisms of initiation, and roles of activators and coactivators. Genetics 189, 705–736 (2011).
Takahashi, K. & Yamanaka, S. A decade of transcription factor-mediated reprogramming to pluripotency. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Bio. 17, 183–193 (2016).
Soto, L. F. et al. Compendium of human transcription factor effector domains. Mol. Cell 82, 514–526 (2022).
Alerasool, N., Leng, H., Lin, Z.-Y., Gingras, A.-C. & Taipale, M. Identification and functional characterization of transcriptional activators in human cells. Mol. Cell 82, 677–695.e7 (2022).
Sahu, B. et al. Sequence determinants of human gene regulatory elements. Nat. Genet. 54, 283–294 (2022).
Panne, D. The enhanceosome. Curr. Opin. Struc. Biol. 18, 236–242 (2008).
Arnosti, D. N. & Kulkarni, M. M. Transcriptional enhancers: Intelligent enhanceosomes or flexible billboards? J. Cell. Biochem. 94, 890–898 (2005).
de Boer, C. G. et al. Deciphering eukaryotic gene-regulatory logic with 100 million random promoters. Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 56–65 (2020).
King, D. M. et al. Synthetic and genomic regulatory elements reveal aspects of cis-regulatory grammar in mouse embryonic stem cells. eLife 9, e41279 (2020).
Cusanovich, D. A., Pavlovic, B., Pritchard, J. K. & Gilad, Y. The functional consequences of variation in transcription factor binding. PLoS Genet. 10, e1004226 (2014).
Gitter, A. et al. Backup in gene regulatory networks explains differences between binding and knockout results. Mol. Syst. Biol. 5, 276–276 (2009).
Hu, Z., Killion, P. J. & Iyer, V. R. Genetic reconstruction of a functional transcriptional regulatory network. Nat. Genet. 39, 683–687 (2007).
Lenstra, T. L. & Holstege, F. C. P. The discrepancy between chromatin factor location and effect. Nucleus 3, 213–219 (2012).
Kang, Y. et al. Dual threshold optimization and network inference reveal convergent evidence from TF binding locations and TF perturbation responses. Genome Res. 30, 459–471 (2020).
Chua, G. et al. Identifying transcription factor functions and targets by phenotypic activation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 12045–12050 (2006).
Rossi, M. J. et al. A high-resolution protein architecture of the budding yeast genome. Nature 592, 309–314 (2021).
Sopko, R. et al. Mapping pathways and phenotypes by systematic gene overexpression. Mol. Cell 21, 319–330 (2006).
Hackett, S. R. et al. Learning causal networks using inducible transcription factors and transcriptome‐wide time series. Mol. Syst. Biol. 16, e9174 (2020).
Donczew, R. & Hahn, S. BET family members Bdf1/2 modulate global transcription initiation and elongation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. eLife 10, e69619 (2021).
Warfield, L., Donczew, R., Mahendrawada, L. & Hahn, S. Yeast Mediator facilitates transcription initiation at most promoters via a Tail-independent mechanism. Mol. Cell 82, 4033–4048.e7 (2022).
Donczew, R., Warfield, L., Pacheco, D., Erijman, A. & Hahn, S. Two roles for the yeast transcription coactivator SAGA and a set of genes redundantly regulated by TFIID and SAGA. eLife 9, e50109 (2020).
Huisinga, K. L. & Pugh, B. F. A genome-wide housekeeping role for TFIID and a highly regulated stress-related role for SAGA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell 13, 573–585 (2004).
Erijman, A. et al. A high-throughput screen for transcription activation domains reveals their sequence features and permits prediction by deep learning. Mol. Cell 78, 890–902.e6 (2020).
Sanborn, A. L. et al. Simple biochemical features underlie transcriptional activation domain diversity and dynamic, fuzzy binding to Mediator. eLife 10, e68068 (2021).
Zentner, G. E., Kasinathan, S., Xin, B., Rohs, R. & Henikoff, S. ChEC–seq kinetics discriminates transcription factor binding sites by DNA sequence and shape in vivo. Nat. Commun. 6, 8733 (2015).
Schofield, J. A. & Hahn, S. Broad compatibility between yeast UAS elements and core promoters and identification of promoter elements that determine cofactor specificity. Cell Rep. 42, 112387 (2023).
Grant, C. E., Bailey, T. L. & Noble, W. S. FIMO: scanning for occurrences of a given motif. Bioinformatics 27, 1017–1018 (2011).
Brodsky, S. et al. Intrinsically disordered regions direct transcription factor in vivo binding specificity. Mol. Cell 79, 459–471.e4 (2020).
Kumar, D. K. et al. Complementary strategies for directing in vivo transcription factor binding through DNA binding domains and intrinsically disordered regions. Mol. Cell 83, 1462–1473.e5 (2023).
Mehta, G. D. et al. Single-molecule analysis reveals linked cycles of RSC chromatin remodeling and Ace1p transcription factor binding in yeast. Mol. Cell 72, 875–887.e9 (2018).
Nguyen, V. Q. et al. Spatiotemporal coordination of transcription preinitiation complex assembly in live cells. Mol. Cell 81, 3560–3575.e6 (2021).
Kim, J. M. et al. Single-molecule imaging of chromatin remodelers reveals role of ATPase in promoting fast kinetics of target search and dissociation from chromatin. eLife 10, e69387 (2021).
Staller, M. V. Transcription factors perform a 2-step search of the nucleus. Genetics 222, iyac111 (2022).
Swygert, S. G. et al. Condensin-dependent chromatin compaction represses transcription globally during quiescence. Mol. Cell 73, 533–546.e4 (2019).
Seong, K. M. et al. A new method for the construction of a mutant library with a predictable occurrence rate using Poisson distribution. J. Microbiol. Methods 69, 442–450 (2007).
Kim, J. & Struhl, K. Determinants of half-site spacing preferences that distinguish AP-1 and ATF/CREB bZIP domains. Nucleic Acids Res. 23, 2531–2537 (1995).
Brzovic, P. S. et al. The acidic transcription activator Gcn4 binds the mediator subunit Gal11/Med15 using a simple protein interface forming a fuzzy complex. Mol. Cell 44, 942–953 (2011).
Drysdale, C. M. et al. The transcriptional activator GCN4 contains multiple activation domains that are critically dependent on hydrophobic amino acids. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 1220–1233 (1995).
Nishimura, K., Fukagawa, T., Takisawa, H., Kakimoto, T. & Kanemaki, M. An auxin-based degron system for the rapid depletion of proteins in nonplant cells. Nat. Methods 6, 917–922 (2009).
Sudarsanam, P., Cao, Y., Wu, L., Laurent, B. C. & Winston, F. The nucleosome remodeling complex, Snf/Swi, is required for the maintenance of transcription in vivo and is partially redundant with the histone acetyltransferase, Gcn5. EMBO J. 18, 3101–3106 (1999).
McIsaac, R. S., Petti, A. A., Bussemaker, H. J. & Botstein, D. Perturbation-based analysis and modeling of combinatorial regulation in the yeast sulfur assimilation pathway. Mol. Biol. Cell 23, 2993–3007 (2012).
Rubin-Bejerano, I., Mandel, S., Robzyk, K. & Kassir, Y. Induction of meiosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae depends on conversion of the transcriptional repressor Ume6 to a positive regulator by its regulated association with the transcriptional activator Ime1. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 2518–2526 (1996).
Lee, B. et al. Systematic analysis of tup1 and cyc8 mutants reveals distinct roles for TUP1 and CYC8 and offers new insight into the regulation of gene transcription by the yeast Tup1–Cyc8 complex. PLoS Genet. 19, e1010876 (2023).
Weikum, E. R., Knuesel, M. T., Ortlund, E. A. & Yamamoto, K. R. Glucocorticoid receptor control of transcription: precision and plasticity via allostery. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 18, 159–174 (2017).
DelRosso, N. et al. Large-scale mapping and mutagenesis of human transcriptional effector domains. Nature 616, 365–372 (2023).
Wong, E. D. et al. Saccharomyces genome database update: server architecture, pan-genome nomenclature, and external resources. Genetics 224, iyac191 (2023).
Weirauch, M. T. et al. Determination and Inference of eukaryotic transcription factor sequence specificity. Cell 158, 1431–1443 (2014).
Love, M. I., Huber, W. & Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 15, 550 (2014).
Brachmann, C. B. et al. Designer deletion strains derived from Saccharomyces cerevisiae S288C: A useful set of strains and plasmids for PCR‐mediated gene disruption and other applications. Yeast 14, 115–132 (1998).
Grünberg, S., Henikoff, S., Hahn, S. & Zentner, G. E. Mediator binding to UASs is broadly uncoupled from transcription and cooperative with TFIID recruitment to promoters. EMBO J. 35, 2435–2446 (2016).
Donczew, R., Lalou, A., Devys, D., Tora, L. & Hahn, S. An improved ChEC–seq method accurately maps the genome-wide binding of transcription coactivators and sequence-specific transcription factors. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.02.12.430999 (2021).
Warfield, L. et al. Transcription of nearly all yeast RNA polymerase ii-transcribed genes is dependent on transcription factor TFIID. Mol. Cell 68, 118–129.e5 (2017).
Bonnet, J. et al. The SAGA coactivator complex acts on the whole transcribed genome and is required for RNA polymerase II transcription. Genes Dev. 28, 1999–2012 (2014).
Duffy, E. E. et al. Tracking distinct RNA populations using efficient and reversible covalent chemistry. Mol. Cell 59, 858–866 (2015).
Duffy, E. E. & Simon, M. D. Enriching s(4) U-RNA using methane thiosulfonate (MTS) chemistry. Curr. Protoc. Chem. Biol. 8, 234–250 (2016).
Langmead, B. & Salzberg, S. L. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods 9, 357–359 (2012).
Heinz, S. et al. Simple combinations of lineage-determining transcription factors prime cis-regulatory elements required for macrophage and B cell identities. Mol. Cell 38, 576–589 (2010).
Park, D., Morris, A. R., Battenhouse, A. & Iyer, V. R. Simultaneous mapping of transcript ends at single-nucleotide resolution and identification of widespread promoter-associated non-coding RNA governed by TATA elements. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, 3736–3749 (2014).
Anders, S., Pyl, P. T. & Huber, W. HTSeq-a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics 31, 166–169 (2015).
Navarrete-Perea, J., Yu, Q., Gygi, S. P. & Paulo, J. A. Streamlined tandem mass tag (SL-TMT) protocol: an efficient strategy for quantitative (phospho)proteome profiling using tandem mass tag-synchronous precursor selection-MS3. J. Proteome Res. 17, 2226–2236 (2018).
Herbig, E. et al. Mechanism of Mediator recruitment by tandem Gcn4 activation domains and three Gal11 activator-binding domains. Mol. Cell. Biol. 30, 2376–2390 (2010).
Castro-Mondragon, J. A. et al. JASPAR 2022: the 9th release of the open-access database of transcription factor binding profiles. Nucleic Acids Res. 50, D165–D173 (2021).
Rawal, Y. et al. Gcn4 binding in coding regions can activate internal and canonical 5′ promoters in yeast. Mol. Cell 70, 297–311.e4 (2018).
Chereji, R. V., Ramachandran, S., Bryson, T. D. & Henikoff, S. Precise genome-wide mapping of single nucleosomes and linkers in vivo. Genome Biol. 19, 19 (2018).
Johnston, M. A model fungal gene regulatory mechanism: the GAL genes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol. Rev. 51, 458–476 (1987).
Takagi, Y. & Kornberg, R. D. Mediator as a general transcription factor. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 80–89 (2006).
Hahn, S. & Guarente, L. Yeast HAP2 and HAP3: transcriptional activators in a heteromeric complex. Science 240, 317–321 (1988).
Prochasson, P., Florens, L., Swanson, S. K., Washburn, M. P. & Workman, J. L. The HIR corepressor complex binds to nucleosomes generating a distinct protein/DNA complex resistant to remodeling by SWI/SNF. Genes Dev. 19, 2534–2539 (2005).
Chittuluru, J. R. et al. Structure and nucleosome interaction of the yeast NuA4 and Piccolo–NuA4 histone acetyltransferase complexes. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 18, 1196–1203 (2011).
Smith, C. L., Horowitz-Scherer, R., Flanagan, J. F., Woodcock, C. L. & Peterson, C. L. Structural analysis of the yeast SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex. Nat. Struct. Biol. 10, 141–145 (2003).
Keleher, C. A., Redd, M. J., Schultz, J., Carlson, M. & Johnson, A. D. Ssn6–Tup1 is a general repressor of transcription in yeast. Cell 68, 709–719 (1992).
Chou, S., Lane, S. & Liu, H. Regulation of mating and filamentation genes by two distinct Ste12 complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 26, 4794–4805 (2006).
Kurihara, L. J., Stewart, B. G., Gammie, A. E. & Rose, M. D. Kar4p, a karyogamy-specific component of the yeast pheromone response pathway. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 3990–4002 (1996).
Nielsen, P. et al. Transcriptional regulation of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae amino acid permease gene BAP2. Mol. Gen. Genet. 264, 613–622 (2001).
Jia, Y., Rothermel, B., Thornton, J. & Butow, R. A. A basic helix-loop-helix–leucine zipper transcription complex in yeast functions in a signaling pathway from mitochondria to the nucleus. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 1110–1117 (1997).
van Werven, F. J. et al. Cooperative action of NC2 and Mot1p to regulate TATA-binding protein function across the genome. Genes Dev. 22, 2359–2369 (2008).
Eriksson, P. R., Ganguli, D., Nagarajavel, V. & Clark, D. J. Regulation of histone gene expression in budding yeast. Genetics 191, 7–20 (2012).
Martin, D. E., Soulard, A. & Hall, M. N. TOR regulates ribosomal protein gene expression via PKA and the forkhead transcription factor FHL1. Cell 119, 969–979 (2004).
Iraqui, I., Vissers, S., André, B. & Urrestarazu, A. Transcriptional Induction by aromatic amino acids in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 3360–3371 (1999).
Holmberg, S. & Schjerling, P. Cha4p of Saccharomyces cerevisiae activates transcription via serine/threonine response elements. Genetics 144, 467–478 (1996).
Gasmi, N. et al. The switch from fermentation to respiration in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is regulated by the Ert1 transcriptional activator/repressor. Genetics 198, 547–560 (2014).
Soontorngun, N., Larochelle, M., Drouin, S., Robert, F. & Turcotte, B. Regulation of gluconeogenesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is mediated by activator and repressor functions of Rds2. Mol. Cell. Biol. 27, 7895–7905 (2007).
Raitt, D. C. et al. The Skn7 response regulator of Saccharomyces cerevisiae interacts with Hsf1 in vivo and is required for the induction of heat shock genes by oxidative stress. Mol. Biol. Cell 11, 2335–2347 (2000).
Lorenz, M. C. & Heitman, J. Regulators of pseudohyphal differentiation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae identified through multicopy suppressor analysis in ammonium permease mutant strains. Genetics 150, 1443–1457 (1998).
Thomas, P. D. et al. PANTHER: making genome‐scale phylogenetics accessible to all. Protein Sci. 31, 8–22 (2022).
