Solovei, I., Thanisch, K. & Feodorova, Y. How to rule the nucleus: divide et impera. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 40, 47–59 (2016).
Bhat, P., Honson, D. & Guttman, M. Nuclear compartmentalization as a mechanism of quantitative control of gene expression. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 22, 653–670 (2021).
Belmont, A. S. Nuclear compartments: an incomplete primer to nuclear compartments, bodies, and genome organization relative to nuclear architecture. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a041268 (2022).
Nguyen, H. Q. et al. 3D mapping and accelerated super-resolution imaging of the human genome using in situ sequencing. Nat. Methods 17, 822–832 (2020).
Su, J.-H., Zheng, P., Kinrot, S. S., Bintu, B. & Zhuang, X. Genome-scale imaging of the 3D organization and transcriptional activity of chromatin. Cell 182, 1641–1659 (2020).
Payne, A. C. et al. In situ genome sequencing resolves DNA sequence and structure in intact biological samples. Science 371, eaay3446 (2021).
Takei, Y. et al. Integrated spatial genomics reveals global architecture of single nuclei. Nature 590, 344–350 (2021).
Takei, Y. et al. Single-cell nuclear architecture across cell types in the mouse brain. Science 374, 586–594 (2021).
Lu, T., Ang, C. E. & Zhuang, X. Spatially resolved epigenomic profiling of single cells in complex tissues. Cell 185, 4448–4464 (2022).
Dekker, J. et al. The 4D nucleome project. Nature 549, 219–226 (2017).
Kempfer, R. & Pombo, A. Methods for mapping 3D chromosome architecture. Nat. Rev. Genet. 21, 207–226 (2020).
Jerkovic, I. & Cavalli, G. Understanding 3D genome organization by multidisciplinary methods. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 22, 511–528 (2021).
Conte, M. et al. Polymer physics indicates chromatin folding variability across single-cells results from state degeneracy in phase separation. Nat. Commun. 11, 3289 (2020).
Wang, Y. et al. SPIN reveals genome-wide landscape of nuclear compartmentalization. Genome Biol. 22, 36 (2021).
Boninsegna, L. et al. Integrative genome modeling platform reveals essentiality of rare contact events in 3D genome organizations. Nat. Methods 19, 938–949 (2022).
Shah, S. et al. Dynamics and spatial genomics of the nascent transcriptome by intron seqFISH. Cell 174, 363–376 (2018).
Eng, C.-H. L. et al. Transcriptome-scale super-resolved imaging in tissues by RNA seqFISH+. Nature 568, 235–239 (2019).
Xia, C., Fan, J., Emanuel, G., Hao, J. & Zhuang, X. Spatial transcriptome profiling by MERFISH reveals subcellular RNA compartmentalization and cell cycle-dependent gene expression. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 19490–19499 (2019).
Wang, S. et al. Spatial organization of chromatin domains and compartments in single chromosomes. Science 353, 598–602 (2016).
Bintu, B. et al. Super-resolution chromatin tracing reveals domains and cooperative interactions in single cells. Science 362, eaau1783 (2018).
Chen, L.-F. et al. Structural elements promote architectural stripe formation and facilitate ultra-long-range gene regulation at a human disease locus. Mol. Cell 83, 1446–1461 (2023).
Hafner, A. et al. Loop stacking organizes genome folding from TADs to chromosomes. Mol. Cell 83, 1377–1392 (2023).
Lieberman-Aiden, E. et al. Comprehensive mapping of long-range interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome. Science 326, 289–293 (2009).
Bonev, B. et al. Multiscale 3D genome rewiring during mouse neural development. Cell 171, 557–572 (2017).
Svensson, V. et al. Power analysis of single-cell RNA-sequencing experiments. Nat. Methods 14, 381–387 (2017).
Marshall, J. L. et al. HyPR-seq: single-cell quantification of chosen RNAs via hybridization and sequencing of DNA probes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 33404–33413 (2020).
Kouzarides, T. Chromatin modifications and their function. Cell 128, 693–705 (2007).
Chen, Y. & Belmont, A. S. Genome organization around nuclear speckles. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 55, 91–99 (2019).
Pederson, T. The nucleolus. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 3, a000638 (2011).
van Steensel, B. & Belmont, A. S. Lamina-associated domains: links with chromosome architecture, heterochromatin, and gene repression. Cell 169, 780–791 (2017).
Skene, P. J. & Henikoff, S. An efficient targeted nuclease strategy for high-resolution mapping of DNA binding sites. eLife 6, e21856 (2017).
Skene, P. J., Henikoff, J. G. & Henikoff, S. Targeted in situ genome-wide profiling with high efficiency for low cell numbers. Nat. Protoc. 13, 1006–1019 (2018).
van Schaik, T., Vos, M., Peric-Hupkes, D., Hn Celie, P. & van Steensel, B. Cell cycle dynamics of lamina-associated DNA. EMBO Rep. 21, e50636 (2020).
Quinodoz, S. A. et al. RNA promotes the formation of spatial compartments in the nucleus. Cell 184, 5775–5790 (2021).
Johnson, D. S., Mortazavi, A., Myers, R. M. & Wold, B. Genome-wide mapping of in vivo protein–DNA interactions. Science 316, 1497–1502 (2007).
Kaya-Okur, H. S. et al. CUT&Tag for efficient epigenomic profiling of small samples and single cells. Nat. Commun. 10, 1930 (2019).
Woodworth, M. A. et al. Multiplexed single-cell profiling of chromatin states at genomic loci by expansion microscopy. Nucleic Acids Res. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkab423 (2021).
Kozareva, V. et al. A transcriptomic atlas of mouse cerebellar cortex comprehensively defines cell types. Nature 598, 214–219 (2021).
Falk, M. et al. Heterochromatin drives compartmentalization of inverted and conventional nuclei. Nature 570, 395–399 (2019).
Linhoff, M. W., Garg, S. K. & Mandel, G. A high-resolution imaging approach to investigate chromatin architecture in complex tissues. Cell 163, 246–255 (2015).
Lafarga, M., Casafont, I., Bengoechea, R., Tapia, O. & Berciano, M. T. Cajal’s contribution to the knowledge of the neuronal cell nucleus. Chromosoma 118, 437–443 (2009).
Gil, L. et al. Perinuclear Lamin A and nucleoplasmic Lamin B2 characterize two types of hippocampal neurons through Alzheimer’s disease progression. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21, 1841 (2020).
Solovei, I., Grandi, N., Knoth, R., Volk, B. & Cremer, T. Positional changes of pericentromeric heterochromatin and nucleoli in postmitotic Purkinje cells during murine cerebellum development. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 105, 302–310 (2004).
Zhang, L. et al. TSA-seq reveals a largely conserved genome organization relative to nuclear speckles with small position changes tightly correlated with gene expression changes. Genome Res. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.266239.120 (2021).
Chen, Y. et al. Mapping 3D genome organization relative to nuclear compartments using TSA-Seq as a cytological ruler. J. Cell Biol. 217, 4025–4048 (2018).
Quinodoz, S. A. et al. Higher-order inter-chromosomal hubs shape 3D genome organization in the nucleus. Cell 174, 744–757 (2018).
Alexander, K. A. et al. p53 mediates target gene association with nuclear speckles for amplified RNA expression. Mol. Cell 81, 1666–1681 (2021).
Gabel, H. W. et al. Disruption of DNA-methylation-dependent long gene repression in Rett syndrome. Nature 522, 89–93 (2015).
Koopmans, F. et al. SynGO: an evidence-based, expert-curated knowledge base for the synapse. Neuron 103, 217–234 (2019).
King, I. F. et al. Topoisomerases facilitate transcription of long genes linked to autism. Nature 501, 58–62 (2013).
Zhao, Y.-T. et al. Long genes linked to autism spectrum disorders harbor broad enhancer-like chromatin domains. Genome Res. 28, 933–942 (2018).
Walczak, A. et al. Novel higher-order epigenetic regulation of the Bdnf gene upon seizures. J. Neurosci. 33, 2507–2511 (2013).
Winick-Ng, W. et al. Cell-type specialization is encoded by specific chromatin topologies. Nature 599, 684–691 (2021).
Leidescher, S. et al. Spatial organization of transcribed eukaryotic genes. Nat. Cell Biol. 24, 327–339 (2022).
Sadakata, T. et al. Impaired cerebellar development and function in mice lacking CAPS2, a protein involved in neurotrophin release. J. Neurosci. 27, 2472–2482 (2007).
Brueckner, L. et al. Local rewiring of genome-nuclear lamina interactions by transcription. EMBO J. 39, e103159 (2020).
Zhao, Z. et al. Mega-enhancer bodies organize neuronal long genes in the cerebellum. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.07.19.549737 (2023).
Bhat, P. et al. Genome organization around nuclear speckles drives mRNA splicing efficiency. Nature 629, 1165–1173 (2024).
Ahanger, S. H. et al. Distinct nuclear compartment-associated genome architecture in the developing mammalian brain. Nat. Neurosci. 24, 1235–1242 (2021).
von Schimmelmann, M. et al. Polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2) silences genes responsible for neurodegeneration. Nat. Neurosci. 19, 1321–1330 (2016).
O’Geen, H. et al. Genome-wide analysis of KAP1 binding suggests autoregulation of KRAB-ZNFs. PLoS Genet. 3, e89 (2007).
Vieux-Rochas, M., Fabre, P. J., Leleu, M., Duboule, D. & Noordermeer, D. Clustering of mammalian Hox genes with other H3K27me3 targets within an active nuclear domain. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 4672–4677 (2015).
Galliano, E. et al. Impact of NMDA receptor overexpression on cerebellar Purkinje cell activity and motor learning. eNeuro 5, ENEURO.0270-17.2018 (2018).
Tomita, H. et al. The protein tyrosine phosphatase receptor delta regulates developmental neurogenesis. Cell Rep. 30, 215–228 (2020).
Stoyanova, E., Riad, M., Rao, A. & Heintz, N. 5-Hydroxymethylcytosine-mediated active demethylation is required for mammalian neuronal differentiation and function. eLife 10, e66973 (2021).
van’t Sant, L. J., White, J. J., Hoeijmakers, J. H. J., Vermeij, W. P. & Jaarsma, D. In vivo 5-ethynyluridine (EU) labelling detects reduced transcription in Purkinje cell degeneration mouse mutants, but can itself induce neurodegeneration. Acta Neuropathol. Commun. 9, 94 (2021).
Agredo, A. & Kasinski, A. L. Histone 4 lysine 20 tri-methylation: a key epigenetic regulator in chromatin structure and disease. Front. Genet. 14, 1243395 (2023).
Magklara, A. et al. An epigenetic signature for monoallelic olfactory receptor expression. Cell 145, 555–570 (2011).
Clowney, E. J. et al. Nuclear aggregation of olfactory receptor genes governs their monogenic expression. Cell 151, 724–737 (2012).
Armelin-Correa, L. M., Gutiyama, L. M., Brandt, D. Y. C. & Malnic, B. Nuclear compartmentalization of odorant receptor genes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 2782–2787 (2014).
Monahan, K., Horta, A. & Lomvardas, S. LHX2- and LDB1-mediated trans interactions regulate olfactory receptor choice. Nature 565, 448–453 (2019).
Tan, L., Xing, D., Daley, N. & Xie, X. S. Three-dimensional genome structures of single sensory neurons in mouse visual and olfactory systems. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 26, 297–307 (2019).
Lister, R. et al. Global epigenomic reconfiguration during mammalian brain development. Science 341, 1237905 (2013).
Tan, L. et al. Changes in genome architecture and transcriptional dynamics progress independently of sensory experience during post-natal brain development. Cell 184, 741–758 (2021).
Lilue, J. et al. Sixteen diverse laboratory mouse reference genomes define strain-specific haplotypes and novel functional loci. Nat. Genet. 50, 1574–1583 (2018).
Lilue, J., Shivalikanjli, A., Adams, D. J. & Keane, T. M. Mouse protein coding diversity: what’s left to discover? PLoS Genet. 15, e1008446 (2019).
Tan, L. et al. Lifelong restructuring of 3D genome architecture in cerebellar granule cells. Science 381, 1112–1119 (2023).
Hewitt, S. L. et al. Association between the Igk and Igh immunoglobulin loci mediated by the 3′ Igk enhancer induces’ decontraction’ of the Igh locus in pre–B cells. Nat. Immunol. 9, 396–404 (2008).
Arrastia, M. V. et al. Single-cell measurement of higher-order 3D genome organization with scSPRITE. Nat. Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-021-00998-1 (2022).
Zhu, C. et al. Joint profiling of histone modifications and transcriptome in single cells from mouse brain. Nat. Methods 18, 283–292 (2021).
Bartosovic, M. & Castelo-Branco, G. Multimodal chromatin profiling using nanobody-based single-cell CUT&Tag. Nat. Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-022-01535-4 (2023).
Baltanás, F. C. et al. Purkinje cell degeneration in pcd mice reveals large scale chromatin reorganization and gene silencing linked to defective DNA repair. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 28287–28302 (2011).
Chomiak, A. A. et al. Nde1 is required for heterochromatin compaction and stability in neocortical neurons. iScience 25, 104354 (2022).
Letsou, W. & Cai, L. Noncommutative biology: sequential regulation of complex networks. PLoS Comput. Biol. 12, e1005089 (2016).
Pownall, M. E. et al. Chromatin expansion microscopy reveals nanoscale organization of transcription and chromatin. Science 381, 92–100 (2023).
Pascual-Reguant, L. et al. Lamin B1 mapping reveals the existence of dynamic and functional euchromatin lamin B1 domains. Nat. Commun. 9, 3420 (2018).
van Schaik, T. et al. CTCF and cohesin promote focal detachment of DNA from the nuclear lamina. Genome Biol. 23, 185 (2022).
Shah, S., Lubeck, E., Zhou, W. & Cai, L. In situ transcription profiling of single cells reveals spatial organization of cells in the mouse hippocampus. Neuron 92, 342–357 (2016).
Hershberg, E. A. et al. PaintSHOP enables the interactive design of transcriptome- and genome-scale oligonucleotide FISH experiments. Nat. Methods 18, 937–944 (2021).
Beliveau, B. J. et al. Versatile design and synthesis platform for visualizing genomes with Oligopaint FISH probes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 21301–21306 (2012).
Zhang, W. et al. Zscan4c activates endogenous retrovirus MERVL and cleavage embryo genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, 8485–8501 (2019).
Gong, H. et al. Simple method to prepare oligonucleotide-conjugated antibodies and its application in multiplex protein detection in single cells. Bioconjug. Chem. 27, 217–225 (2015).
Agasti, S. S. et al. DNA-barcoded labeling probes for highly multiplexed Exchange-PAINT imaging. Chem. Sci. 8, 3080–3091 (2017).
Finn, E. H. et al. Extensive heterogeneity and intrinsic variation in spatial genome organization. Cell 176, 1502–1515 (2019).
Edelstein, A., Amodaj, N., Hoover, K., Vale, R. & Stuurman, N. Computer control of microscopes using µManager. Curr. Protoc. Mol. Biol. 92, 14.20.1–14.20.17 (2010).
Stringer, C., Wang, T., Michaelos, M. & Pachitariu, M. Cellpose: a generalist algorithm for cellular segmentation. Nat. Methods 18, 100–106 (2021).
Waisman, A., Norris, A. M., Elías Costa, M. & Kopinke, D. Automatic and unbiased segmentation and quantification of myofibers in skeletal muscle. Sci. Rep. 11, 11793 (2021).
Pachitariu, M. & Stringer, C. Cellpose 2.0: how to train your own model. Nat. Methods 19, 1634–1641 (2022).
Boyd, N., Schiebinger, G. & Recht, B. The alternating descent conditional gradient method for sparse inverse problems. SIAM J. Optim. https://doi.org/10.1137/15M1035793 (2017).
Hormoz, S. et al. Inferring cell-state transition dynamics from lineage trees and endpoint single-cell measurements. Cell Syst. 3, 419–433 (2016).
Gu, B. et al. Transcription-coupled changes in nuclear mobility of mammalian cis-regulatory elements. Science 359, 1050–1055 (2018).
Nagano, T. et al. Cell-cycle dynamics of chromosomal organization at single-cell resolution. Nature 547, 61–67 (2017).
Stevens, T. J. et al. 3D structures of individual mammalian genomes studied by single-cell Hi-C. Nature 544, 59–64 (2017).
Parthasarathy, R. Rapid, accurate particle tracking by calculation of radial symmetry centers. Nat. Methods 9, 724–726 (2012).
Liu, S.-L. et al. Fast and high-accuracy localization for three-dimensional single-particle tracking. Sci. Rep. 3, 2462 (2013).
Ramachandran, P. & Varoquaux, G. Mayavi: 3D visualization of scientific data. Comput. Sci. Eng. 13, 40–51 (2011).
Quinlan, A. R. & Hall, I. M. BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics 26, 841–842 (2010).
Ewels, P. A. et al. The nf-core framework for community-curated bioinformatics pipelines. Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 276–278 (2020).
Di Tommaso, P. et al. Nextflow enables reproducible computational workflows. Nat. Biotechnol. 35, 316–319 (2017).
Langmead, B. & Salzberg, S. L. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods 9, 357–359 (2012).
Amemiya, H. M., Kundaje, A. & Boyle, A. P. The ENCODE blacklist: identification of problematic regions of the genome. Sci. Rep. 9, 9354 (2019).
Ramírez, F. et al. deepTools2: a next generation web server for deep-sequencing data analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, W160–W165 (2016).
Antebi, Y. E. et al. Combinatorial signal perception in the BMP pathway. Cell 170, 1184–1196 (2017).
Jonkers, I., Kwak, H. & Lis, J. T. Genome-wide dynamics of Pol II elongation and its interplay with promoter proximal pausing, chromatin, and exons. eLife 3, e02407 (2014).
Martin, M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet J. https://doi.org/10.14806/ej.17.1.200 (2011).
Li, H. et al. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25, 2078–2079 (2009).
Peric-Hupkes, D. et al. Molecular maps of the reorganization of genome-nuclear lamina interactions during differentiation. Mol. Cell 38, 603–613 (2010).
Meuleman, W. et al. Constitutive nuclear lamina–genome interactions are highly conserved and associated with A/T-rich sequence. Genome Res. 23, 270–280 (2013).
Stuart, T. et al. Comprehensive integration of single-cell data. Cell 177, 1888–1902 (2019).
Love, M. I., Huber, W. & Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 15, 550 (2014).
Tasic, B. et al. Adult mouse cortical cell taxonomy revealed by single cell transcriptomics. Nat. Neurosci. 19, 335–346 (2016).
Wolf, F. A., Angerer, P. & Theis, F. J. SCANPY: large-scale single-cell gene expression data analysis. Genome Biol. 19, 15 (2018).
Hie, B., Bryson, B. & Berger, B. Efficient integration of heterogeneous single-cell transcriptomes using Scanorama. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 685–691 (2019).
Traag, V. A., Waltman, L. & van Eck, N. J. From Louvain to Leiden: guaranteeing well-connected communities. Sci. Rep. 9, 5233 (2019).
Becht, E. et al. Dimensionality reduction for visualizing single-cell data using UMAP. Nat. Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.4314 (2019).
Takei, Y., Shah, S., Harvey, S., Qi, L. S. & Cai, L. Multiplexed dynamic imaging of genomic loci by combined CRISPR imaging and DNA sequential FISH. Biophys. J. 112, 1773–1776 (2017).
Liu, M. et al. Multiplexed imaging of nucleome architectures in single cells of mammalian tissue. Nat. Commun. 11, 2907 (2020).
Bizhanova, A., Yan, A., Yu, J., Zhu, L. J. & Kaufman, P. D. Distinct features of nucleolus-associated domains in mouse embryonic stem cells. Chromosoma 129, 121–139 (2020).
Nichols, M. H. & Corces, V. G. Principles of 3D compartmentalization of the human genome. Cell Rep. 35, 109330 (2021).
Kwak, Y. D. et al. Chromatin architecture at susceptible gene loci in cerebellar Purkinje cells characterizes DNA damage-induced neurodegeneration. Sci. Adv. 7, eabg6363 (2021).
Yu, G., Wang, L.-G., Han, Y. & He, Q.-Y. clusterProfiler: an R package for comparing biological themes among gene clusters. OMICS 16, 284–287 (2012).
Hounkpe, B. W., Chenou, F., de Lima, F. & De Paula, E. V. HRT Atlas v1.0 database: redefining human and mouse housekeeping genes and candidate reference transcripts by mining massive RNA-seq datasets. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, D947–D955 (2021).
Kinsella, R. J. et al. Ensembl BioMarts: a hub for data retrieval across taxonomic space. Database 2011, bar030 (2011).
Abrahams, B. S. et al. SFARI Gene 2.0: a community-driven knowledgebase for the autism spectrum disorders (ASDs). Mol. Autism 4, 36 (2013).
Takei, Y., Yang, Y. & Cai, L. High-resolution spatial multi-omics datasets. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7693825 (2023).
Takei, Y. & Cai, L. Supplementary files for integrated spatial genomics in mouse brain cortex. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4708112 (2021).
Yang, M. et al. Chemical-induced chromatin remodeling reprograms mouse ESCs to totipotent-like stem cells. Cell Stem Cell https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2022.01.010 (2022).
De Zeeuw, C. I. Bidirectional learning in upbound and downbound microzones of the cerebellum. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 22, 92–110 (2021).
Chen, X. et al. Transcriptomic mapping uncovers Purkinje neuron plasticity driving learning. Nature 605, 722–727 (2022).
MacDonald, J. L. & Roskams, A. J. Histone deacetylases 1 and 2 are expressed at distinct stages of neuro-glial development. Dev. Dyn. 237, 2256–2267 (2008).
Cerrato, V. et al. Sox2 conditional mutation in mouse causes ataxic symptoms, cerebellar vermis hypoplasia, and postnatal defects of Bergmann glia. Glia 66, 1929–1946 (2018).
Eberhart, A., Kimura, H., Leonhardt, H., Joffe, B. & Solovei, I. Reliable detection of epigenetic histone marks and nuclear proteins in tissue cryosections. Chromosome Res. 20, 849–858 (2012).
