Friday, March 14, 2025
No menu items!
HomeNatureWeather anomalies cannot explain insect decline

Weather anomalies cannot explain insect decline

  • Hallmann, C. A. et al. More than 75 percent decline over 27 years in total flying insect biomass in protected areas. PLoS ONE 12, e0185809 (2017).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wagner, D. L., Grames, E. M., Forister, M. L., Berenbaum, M. R. & Stopak, D. Insect decline in the Anthropocene: death by a thousand cuts. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2023989118 (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rumohr, Q. et al. Drivers and pressures behind insect decline in central and western Europe based on long-term monitoring data. PLoS ONE 18, e0289565 (2023).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Müller, J. et al. Weather explains the decline and rise of insect biomass over 34 years. Nature 628, 349–354 (2024).

    Article 
    ADS 
    PubMed 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Mühlethaler, R. et al. No recovery in the biomass of flying insects over the last decade in German nature protected areas. Ecol. Evol. 14, e11182 (2024).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hörren, T. et al. Monitoring der biodiversität flugaktiver insekten in NRW. Nat. NRW 3, 17–21 (2023).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Lehmann, G. U. C. et al. Diversity of insects in nature protected areas (DINA): an interdisciplinary German research project. Biodivers. Conserv. 30, 2605–2614 (2021).

    Article 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ssymank, A. et al. Praktische hinweise und empfehlungen zur anwendung von malaisefallen für insekten in der biodiversitätserfassung und im monitoring. Ser. Nat. 1, 1–12 (2018).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Bergman, K.-O. et al. Clear-cuts are temporary habitats, not matrix, for endangered grassland burnet moths (Zygaena spp.). J. Insect Conserv. 24, 269–277 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Milberg, P., Eriksson, V. & Bergman, K.-O. Assemblages of flower-visiting insects in clear-cuts are rich and dynamic. Eur. J. Entomol. 118, 182–191 (2021).

    Article 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Eckerter, T., Braunisch, V., Buse, J. & Klein, A. M. Open forest successional stages and landscape heterogeneity promote wild bee diversity in temperate forests. Conserv. Sci. Practice 4, e12843 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zitomer, R. A. et al. Bee diversity decreases rapidly with time since harvest in intensively managed conifer forests. Ecol. Appl. 33, e2855 (2023).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hörren, T. et al. Biodiversitätsverluste in FFH-lebensraumtypen des offenlandes — ergebnisse und perspektiven eines F&E-projektes. Ser. Nat. 1, 1–26 (2022).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Anderson, D. & Burnham, K. Model Selection and Multi-Model Inference Vol. 63 (Springer, 2004).

  • Dalton, R. M., Underwood, N. C., Inouye, D. W., Soulé, M. E. & Inouye, B. D. Long-term declines in insect abundance and biomass in a subalpine habitat. Ecosphere 14, e4620 (2023).

    Article 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hallmann, C. et al. Data accompanying “Weather anomalies cannot explain insect decline”. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14258659 (2024).

  • RELATED ARTICLES

    Most Popular

    Recent Comments