Halldorsson, B. V. et al. Characterizing mutagenic effects of recombination through a sequence-level genetic map. Science 363, eaau1043 (2019).
Kong, A. et al. A high-resolution recombination map of the human genome. Nat. Genet. 31, 241–247 (2002).
Bhérer, C., Campbell, C. L. & Auton, A. Refined genetic maps reveal sexual dimorphism in human meiotic recombination at multiple scales. Nat. Commun. 8, 14994 (2017).
Broman, K. W., Murray, J. C., Sheffield, V. C., White, R. L. & Weber, J. L. Comprehensive human genetic maps: individual and sex-specific variation in recombination. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 63, 861 (1998).
Frazer, K. A. et al. A second generation human haplotype map of over 3.1 million SNPs. Nature 449, 851–861 (2007).
Haber, J. Genome Stability (Garland Science, 2013).
Zickler, D. & Kleckner, N. Recombination, pairing, and synapsis of homologs during meiosis. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 7, 1–28 (2015).
Bergman, J. & Schierup, M. H. Evolutionary dynamics of pseudoautosomal region 1 in humans and great apes. Genome Biol. 23, 215 (2022).
Jónsson, H. et al. Parental influence on human germline de novo mutations in 1,548 trios from Iceland. Nature 549, 519–522 (2017).
Pratto, F. et al. Recombination initiation maps of individual human genomes. Science 346, 1256442 (2014).
Hinch, R., Donnelly, P. & Hinch, A. G. Meiotic DNA breaks drive multifaceted mutagenesis in the human germ line. Science 382, eadh2531 (2023).
Sun, H., Treco, D., Schultes, N. P. & Szostak, J. W. Double-strand breaks at an initiation site for meiotic gene conversion. Nature 338, 87–90 (1989).
Baudat, F. et al. PRDM9 is a major determinant of meiotic recombination hotspots in humans and mice. Science 327, 836–840 (2010).
Robert, T. et al. The TopoVIB-like protein family is required for meiotic DNA double-strand break formation. Science 351, 943–949 (2016).
Keeney, S., Giroux, C. N. & Kleckner, N. Meiosis-specific DNA double-strand breaks are catalyzed by Spo11, a member of a widely conserved protein family. Cell 88, 375–384 (1997).
Szostak, J. W., Orr-Weaver, T. L., Rothstein, R. J. & Stahl, F. W. The double-strand-break repair model for recombination. Cell 33, 25–35 (1983).
Zickler, D. & Kleckner, N. Meiosis: dances between homologs. Annu. Rev. Genet. 57, 1–63 (2023).
Chen, J.-M., Cooper, D. N., Chuzhanova, N., Férec, C. & Patrinos, G. P. Gene conversion: mechanisms, evolution and human disease. Nat. Rev. Genet. 8, 762–775 (2007).
Handel, M. A. & Schimenti, J. C. Genetics of mammalian meiosis: regulation, dynamics and impact on fertility. Nat. Rev. Genet. 11, 124–136 (2010).
Gray, S. & Cohen, P. E. Control of meiotic crossovers: from double-strand break formation to designation. Annu. Rev. Genet. 50, 175–210 (2016).
Collins, J. K. & Jones, K. T. DNA damage responses in mammalian oocytes. Reproduction 152, R15–R22 (2016).
Gudbjartsson, D. F. et al. Sequence variants from whole genome sequencing a large group of Icelanders. Sci. Data 2, 150011 (2015).
Hardarson, M. T., Palsson, G. & Halldorsson, B. V. NCOurd: modelling length distributions of NCO events and gene conversion tracts. Bioinformatics 39, btad485 (2023).
Halldorsson, B. V. et al. The rate of meiotic gene conversion varies by sex and age. Nat. Genet. 48, 1377–1384 (2016).
Williams, A. L. et al. Non-crossover gene conversions show strong GC bias and unexpected clustering in humans. eLife 4, e04637 (2015).
Browning, S. R. & Browning, B. L. Biobank-scale inference of multi-individual identity by descent and gene conversion. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 111, 691–700 (2024).
Tiemann-Boege, I., Schwarz, T., Striedner, Y. & Heissl, A. The consequences of sequence erosion in the evolution of recombination hotspots. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 372, 20160462 (2017).
Kostka, D., Hubisz, M. J., Siepel, A. & Pollard, K. S. The role of GC-biased gene conversion in shaping the fastest evolving regions of the human genome. Mol. Biol. Evol. 29, 1047–1057 (2012).
Jeffreys, A. J. & May, C. A. Intense and highly localized gene conversion activity in human meiotic crossover hot spots. Nat. Genet. 36, 151–156 (2004).
Wall, J. D., Robinson, J. A. & Cox, L. A. High-resolution estimates of crossover and noncrossover recombination from a captive baboon colony. Genome Biol. Evol. 14, evac040 (2022).
Versoza, C. J. et al. Novel insights into the landscape of crossover and noncrossover events in rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta). Genome Biol. Evol. 16, evad223 (2024).
Cole, F. et al. Mouse tetrad analysis provides insights into recombination mechanisms and hotspot evolutionary dynamics. Nat. Genet. 46, 1072–1080 (2014).
Mimitou, E. P., Yamada, S. & Keeney, S. A global view of meiotic double-strand break end resection. Science 355, 40–45 (2017).
Paiano, J. et al. ATM and PRDM9 regulate SPO11-bound recombination intermediates during meiosis. Nat. Commun. 11, 1–15 (2020).
Oliver-Bonet, M., Campillo, M., Turek, P. J., Ko, E. & Martin, R. H. Analysis of replication protein A (RPA) in human spermatogenesis. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 13, 837–844 (2007).
Lenzi, M. L. et al. Extreme heterogeneity in the molecular events leading to the establishment of chiasmata during meiosis i in human oocytes. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 76, 112–127 (2005).
Wang, S. et al. Per-nucleus crossover covariation and implications for evolution. Cell 177, 326–338.e16 (2019).
Martini, E., Diaz, R. L., Hunter, N. & Keeney, S. Crossover homeostasis in yeast meiosis. Cell https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2006.05.044 (2006).
Altemose, N. et al. A map of human PRDM9 binding provides evidence for novel behaviors of PRDM9 and other zinc-finger proteins in meiosis. eLife 6, e28383 (2017).
Boix, C. A., James, B. T., Park, Y. P., Meuleman, W. & Kellis, M. Regulatory genomic circuitry of human disease loci by integrative epigenomics. Nature 590, 300–307 (2021).
Kong, A. et al. Fine-scale recombination rate differences between sexes, populations and individuals. Nature 467, 1099–1103 (2010).
Powers, N. R. et al. The meiotic recombination activator PRDM9 trimethylates both H3K36 and H3K4 at recombination hotspots in vivo. PLoS Genet. 12, e1006146 (2016).
Pai, C. C. et al. A histone H3K36 chromatin switch coordinates DNA double-strand break repair pathway choice. Nat. Commun. 5, 4091 (2014).
Baudat, F. & de Massy, B. Regulating double-stranded DNA break repair towards crossover or non-crossover during mammalian meiosis. Chromosom. Res. 15, 565–577 (2007).
Hinch, A. G. et al. Factors influencing meiotic recombination revealed by whole-genome sequencing of single sperm. Science 363, eaau8861 (2019).
Centola, M. & Carbon, J. Cloning and characterization of centromeric DNA from Neurospora crassa. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 1510–1519 (1994).
Puechberty, J. et al. Genetic and physical analyses of the centromeric and pericentromeric regions of human chromosome 5: recombination across 5cen. Genomics 56, 274–287 (1999).
Mahtani, M. M. & Willard, H. F. Physical and genetic mapping of the human X chromosome centromere: repression of recombination. Genome Res. 8, 100–110 (1998).
Vincenten, N. et al. The kinetochore prevents centromere-proximal crossover recombination during meiosis. eLife 4, e10850 (2015).
Lindahl, T. Instability and decay of the primary structure of DNA. Nature 362, 709–715 (1993).
Chan, K. & Gordenin, D. A. Clusters of multiple mutations: incidence and molecular mechanisms. Annu. Rev. Genet. 49, 243–267 (2015).
Pratto, F. et al. Meiotic recombination mirrors patterns of germline replication in mice and humans. Cell https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CELL.2021.06.025 (2021).
Neri, F. et al. Intragenic DNA methylation prevents spurious transcription initiation. Nature 543, 72–77 (2017).
Goldmann, J. M. et al. Germline de novo mutation clusters arise during oocyte aging in genomic regions with high double-strand-break incidence. Nat. Genet. 50, 487–492 (2018).
Kong, A. et al. Recombination rate and reproductive success in humans. Nat. Genet. 36, 1203–1206 (2004).
Martin, H. C. et al. Multicohort analysis of the maternal age effect on recombination. Nat. Commun. 6, 7846 (2015).
Li, R. et al. A high-resolution map of non-crossover events reveals impacts of genetic diversity on mammalian meiotic recombination. Nat. Commun. 10, 3900 (2019).
de Boer, E., Jasin, M. & Keeney, S. Local and sex-specific biases in crossover vs. noncrossover outcomes at meiotic recombination hot spots in mice. Genes Dev. 29, 1721–1733 (2015).
de Boer, E., Stam, P., Dietrich, A. J. J., Pastink, A. & Heyting, C. Two levels of interference in mouse meiotic recombination. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 9607–9612 (2006).
Wang, H. & Xu, X. Microhomology-mediated end joining: new players join the team. Cell Biosci. 7, 6 (2017).
Wartosch, L. et al. Origins and mechanisms leading to aneuploidy in human eggs. Prenat. Diagn. 41, 620–630 (2021).
Steinthorsdottir, V. et al. Variant in the synaptonemal complex protein SYCE2 associates with pregnancy loss through effect on recombination. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41594-023-01209-y (2024).
Kong, A. et al. Detection of sharing by descent, long-range phasing and haplotype imputation. Nat. Genet. 40, 1068–1075 (2008).
Kong, A. et al. Parental origin of sequence variants associated with complex diseases. Nature 462, 868–874 (2009).
Schneider, V. A. et al. Evaluation of GRCh38 and de novo haploid genome assemblies demonstrates the enduring quality of the reference assembly. Genome Res. 27, 849–864 (2017).
Cheung, V. G. et al. Integration of cytogenetic landmarks into the draft sequence of the human genome. Nature 409, 953–958 (2001).
Furey, T. S. & Haussler, D. Integration of the cytogenetic map with the draft human genome sequence. Hum. Mol. Genet. 12, 1037–1044 (2003).
R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2017).
Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B. & Christensen, R. H. B. lmerTest package: tests in linear mixed effects models. J. Stat. Softw. 82, 1–26 (2017).
Seabold, S. & Perktold, J. Statsmodels: econometric and statistical modeling with Python. In Proc. 9th Python in Science Conference (eds van der Walt, S. & Millman, J.) 92–96 (SciPy, 2010).
O’Leary, N. A. et al. Reference sequence (RefSeq) database at NCBI: current status, taxonomic expansion, and functional annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, D733–D745 (2016).
Pálsson, G. DecodeGenetics/PalssonEtAl_Nature_2024: initial release of data. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14025564 (2024).
