Buck, L. & Axel, R. A novel multigene family may encode odorant receptors: a molecular basis for odor recognition. Cell 65, 175â187 (1991).
Glusman, G., Yanai, I., Rubin, I. & Lancet, D. The complete human olfactory subgenome. Genome Res. 11, 685â702 (2001).
Ikegami, K. et al. Structural instability and divergence from conserved residues underlie intracellular retention of mammalian odorant receptors. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 2957â2967 (2020).
Malnic, B., Godfrey, P. A. & Buck, L. B. The human olfactory receptor gene family. Proc. Natl Acad Sci. USA 101, 2584â2589 (2004).
Bjarnadóttir, T. K. et al. Comprehensive repertoire and phylogenetic analysis of the G protein-coupled receptors in human and mouse. Genomics 88, 263â273 (2006).
Liberles, S. D. & Buck, L. B. A second class of chemosensory receptors in the olfactory epithelium. Nature 442, 645â650 (2006).
Olender, T., Jones, T. E. M., Bruford, E. & Lancet, D. A unified nomenclature for vertebrate olfactory receptors. BMC Evol. Biol. 20, 42 (2020).
Malnic, B., Hirono, J., Sato, T. & Buck, L. B. Combinatorial receptor codes for odors. Cell 96, 713â723 (1999).
Saito, H., Chi, Q., Zhuang, H., Matsunami, H. & Mainland, J. D. Odor coding by a mammalian receptor repertoire. Sci. Signal. 2, ra9 (2009).
Cichy, A., Shah, A., Dewan, A., Kaye, S. & Bozza, T. Genetic depletion of class I odorant receptors impacts perception of carboxylic acids. Curr. Biol. 29, 2687â2697.e4 (2019).
Dewan, A., Pacifico, R., Zhan, R., Rinberg, D. & Bozza, T. Non-redundant coding of aversive odours in the main olfactory pathway. Nature 497, 486â489 (2013).
Niimura, Y. On the origin and evolution of vertebrate olfactory receptor genes: comparative genome analysis among 23 chordate species. Genome Biol. Evol. 1, 34â44 (2009).
Bear, D. M., Lassance, J.-M., Hoekstra, H. E. & Datta, S. R. The evolving neural and genetic architecture of vertebrate olfaction. Curr. Biol. 26, R1039âR1049 (2016).
Freitag, J., Krieger, J., Strotmann, J. & Breer, H. Two classes of olfactory receptors in Xenopus laevis. Neuron 15, 1383â1392 (1995).
Billesbølle, C. B. et al. Structural basis of odorant recognition by a human odorant receptor. Nature 615, 742â749 (2023).
Guo, L. et al. Structural basis of amine odorant perception by a mammal olfactory receptor. Nature 618, 193â200 (2023).
Shang, P. et al. Structural and signaling mechanisms of TAAR1 enabled preferential agonist design. Cell 186, 5347â5362.e24 (2023).
Xu, Z. et al. Ligand recognition and G-protein coupling of trace amine receptor TAAR1. Nature 624, 672â681 (2023).
Liu, H. et al. Recognition of methamphetamine and other amines by trace amine receptor TAAR1. Nature 624, 663â671 (2023).
Gusach, A. et al. Molecular recognition of an odorant by the murine trace amine-associated receptor TAAR7f. Nat. Commun. 15, 7555 (2024).
Lu, M., Echeverri, F. & Moyer, B. D. Endoplasmic reticulum retention, degradation, and aggregation of olfactory G-protein coupled receptors. Traffic 4, 416â433 (2003).
Saito, H., Kubota, M., Roberts, R. W., Chi, Q. & Matsunami, H. RTP family members induce functional expression of mammalian odorant receptors. Cell 119, 679â691 (2004).
Zhuang, H. & Matsunami, H. Evaluating cell-surface expression and measuring activation of mammalian odorant receptors in heterologous cells. Nat. Protoc. 3, 1402â1413 (2008).
Noe, F. et al. IL-6-HaloTag® enables live-cell plasma membrane staining, flow cytometry, functional expression, and de-orphaning of recombinant odorant receptors. J. Biol. Methods 4, e81 (2017).
Sternke, M., Tripp, K. W. & Barrick, D. Consensus sequence design as a general strategy to create hyperstable, biologically active proteins. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 11275â11284 (2019).
Desjarlais, J. R. & Berg, J. M. Use of a zinc-finger consensus sequence framework and specificity rules to design specific DNA binding proteins. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 90, 2256â2260 (1993).
Porebski, B. T. & Buckle, A. M. Consensus protein design. Protein Eng. Des. Sel. 29, 245â251 (2016).
Steipe, B., Schiller, B., Plückthun, A. & Steinbacher, S. Sequence statistics reliably predict stabilizing mutations in a protein domain. J. Mol. Biol. 240, 188â192 (1994).
Lehmann, M. et al. From DNA sequence to improved functionality: using protein sequence comparisons to rapidly design a thermostable consensus phytase. Protein Eng. 13, 49â57 (2000).
Choi, C. et al. Understanding the molecular mechanisms of odorant binding and activation of the human OR52 family. Nat. Commun. 14, 8105 (2023).
Nehmé, R. et al. Mini-G proteins: novel tools for studying GPCRs in their active conformation. PLoS ONE 12, e0175642 (2017).
Ballesteros, J. A. & Weinstein, H. in Methods in Neurosciences Vol. 25 (ed. Sealfon, S. C.) 366â428 (Academic Press, 1995).
de March, C. A., Kim, S.-K., Antonczak, S., Goddard, W. A. 3rd & Golebiowski, J. G protein-coupled odorant receptors: from sequence to structure. Protein Sci. 24, 1543â1548 (2015).
Isberg, V. et al. Generic GPCR residue numbersâaligning topology maps while minding the gaps. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 36, 22â31 (2015).
de March, C. A. et al. Conserved residues control activation of mammalian G protein-coupled odorant receptors. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 8611â8616 (2015).
Pluznick, J. L. et al. Olfactory receptor responding to gut microbiota-derived signals plays a role in renin secretion and blood pressure regulation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 4410â4415 (2013).
Shayya, H. J. et al. ER stress transforms random olfactory receptor choice into axon targeting precision. Cell 185, 3896â3912.e22 (2022).
Mainland, J. D., Li, Y. R., Zhou, T., Liu, W. L. L. & Matsunami, H. Human olfactory receptor responses to odorants. Sci. Data 2, 150002 (2015).
Kajiya, K. et al. Molecular bases of odor discrimination: reconstitution of olfactory receptors that recognize overlapping sets of odorants. J. Neurosci. 21, 6018â6025 (2001).
Grosmaitre, X. et al. SR1, a mouse odorant receptor with an unusually broad response profile. J. Neurosci. 29, 14545â14552 (2009).
Schmiedeberg, K. et al. Structural determinants of odorant recognition by the human olfactory receptors OR1A1 and OR1A2. J. Struct. Biol. 159, 400â412 (2007).
Geithe, C., Noe, F., Kreissl, J. & Krautwurst, D. The broadly tuned odorant receptor OR1A1 is highly selective for 3-methyl-2,4-nonanedione, a key food odorant in aged wines, tea, and other foods. Chem. Senses 42, 181â193 (2017).
Ma, N., Lee, S. & Vaidehi, N. Activation microswitches in adenosine receptor A2A function as rheostats in the cell membrane. Biochemistry 59, 4059â4071 (2020).
Dror, R. O. et al. Activation mechanism of the β2-adrenergic receptor. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 18684â18689 (2011).
Lee, S., Nivedha, A. K., Tate, C. G. & Vaidehi, N. Dynamic role of the G protein in stabilizing the active state of the adenosine A2A receptor. Structure 27, 703â712.e3 (2019).
Li, Q. et al. Non-classical amine recognition evolved in a large clade of olfactory receptors. eLife 4, e10441 (2015).
Del Mármol, J., Yedlin, M. A. & Ruta, V. The structural basis of odorant recognition in insect olfactory receptors. Nature 597, 126â131 (2021).
Butterwick, J. A. et al. Cryo-EM structure of the insect olfactory receptor Orco. Nature 560, 447â452 (2018).
Jumper, J. et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 596, 583â589 (2021).
Bender, B. J., Marlow, B. & Meiler, J. Improving homology modeling from low-sequence identity templates in Rosetta: a case study in GPCRs. PLoS Comput. Biol. 16, e1007597 (2020).
Rutherford, S. L. & Lindquist, S. Hsp90 as a capacitor for morphological evolution. Nature 396, 336â342 (1998).
Wyganowski, K. T., Kaltenbach, M. & Tokuriki, N. GroEL/ES buffering and compensatory mutations promote protein evolution by stabilizing folding intermediates. J. Mol. Biol. 425, 3403â3414 (2013).
Agozzino, L. & Dill, K. A. Protein evolution speed depends on its stability and abundance and on chaperone concentrations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 9092â9097 (2018).
Faust, B. et al. Autoantibody mimicry of hormone action at the thyrotropin receptor. Nature 609, 846â853 (2022).
Mastronarde, D. N. SerialEM: a program for automated tilt series acquisition on Tecnai microscopes using prediction of specimen position. Microsc. Microanal. 9, 1182â1183 (2003).
Zheng, S. Q. et al. MotionCor2: anisotropic correction of beam-induced motion for improved cryo-electron microscopy. Nat. Methods 14, 331â332 (2017).
Punjani, A., Rubinstein, J. L., Fleet, D. J. & Brubaker, M. A. cryoSPARC: algorithms for rapid unsupervised cryo-EM structure determination. Nat. Methods 14, 290â296 (2017).
Asarnow, D., Palovcak, E. & Cheng, Y. asarnow/pyem: UCSF Pyem v0.5. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3576630 (2019).
Pettersen, E. F. et al. UCSF ChimeraX: structure visualization for researchers, educators, and developers. Protein Sci. 30, 70â82 (2021).
Scheres, S. H. W. RELION: implementation of a Bayesian approach to cryo-EM structure determination. J. Struct. Biol. 180, 519â530 (2012).
Bushdid, C., de March, C. A., Matsunami, H. & Golebiowski, J. Numerical models and in vitro assays to study odorant receptors. Methods Mol. Biol. 1820, 77â93 (2018).
Zhang, Y., Pan, Y., Matsunami, H. & Zhuang, H. Live-cell measurement of odorant receptor activation using a real-time cAMP assay. J. Vis. Exp. 128, 55831 (2017).
Berendsen, H. J. C., van der Spoel, D. & van Drunen, R. GROMACS: a message-passing parallel molecular dynamics implementation. Comput. Phys. Commun. 91, 43â56 (1995).
Huang, J. et al. CHARMM36m: an improved force field for folded and intrinsically disordered proteins. Nat. Methods 14, 71â73 (2017).
Vanommeslaeghe, K. et al. CHARMM general force field: a force field for drug-like molecules compatible with the CHARMM all-atom additive biological force fields. J. Comput. Chem. 31, 671â690 (2010).
Jo, S., Kim, T., Iyer, V. G. & Im, W. CHARMM-GUI: a web-based graphical user interface for CHARMM. J. Comput. Chem. 29, 1859â1865 (2008).
Jo, S., Lim, J. B., Klauda, J. B. & Im, W. CHARMM-GUI Membrane Builder for mixed bilayers and its application to yeast membranes. Biophys. J. 97, 50â58 (2009).
Lomize, M. A., Pogozheva, I. D., Joo, H., Mosberg, H. I. & Lomize, A. L. OPM database and PPM web server: resources for positioning of proteins in membranes. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, D370âD376 (2012).
Parrinello, M. & Rahman, A. Polymorphic transitions in single crystals: a new molecular dynamics method. J. Appl. Phys. 52, 7182â7190 (1981).
Darden, T., York, D. & Pedersen, L. Particle mesh Ewald: an Nâ log(N) method for Ewald sums in large systems. J. Chem. Phys. 98, 10089â10092 (1993).
Pagès, H., Aboyoun, P., Gentleman, R. & DebRoy, S. Biostrings: Efficient manipulation of biological strings. R package version 2.72.1 https://bioconductor.org/packages/Biostrings (2022).
Charif, D. & Lobry, J. R. in Structural Approaches to Sequence Evolution: Molecules, Networks, Populations (eds Bastolla, U. et al.) 207â232 (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2007).
Paradis, E. & Schliep, K. ape 5.0: an environment for modern phylogenetics and evolutionary analyses in R. Bioinformatics 35, 526â528 (2019).
Xu, S. et al. Ggtree: a serialized data object for visualization of a phylogenetic tree and annotation data. iMeta 1, e56 (2022).
Crooks, G. E., Hon, G., Chandonia, J.-M. & Brenner, S. E. WebLogo: a sequence logo generator. Genome Res. 14, 1188â1190 (2004).
Dang, S. et al. Cryo-EM structures of the TMEM16A calcium-activated chloride channel. Nature 552, 426â429 (2017).
