McCabe, E. R. B. Translational genomics in medical genetics. Genet. Med. 4, 468â471 (2002).
Zeggini, E., Gloyn, A. L., Barton, A. C. & Wain, L. V. Translational genomics and precision medicine: moving from the lab to the clinic. Science 365, 1409â1413 (2019).
Salentijn, E. M. J. et al. Plant translational genomics: from model species to crops. Mol. Breed. 20, 1â13 (2007).
Cannon, S. B., May, G. D. & Jackson, S. A. Three sequenced legume genomes and many crop species: rich opportunities for translational genomics. Plant Physiol. 151, 970â977 (2009).
Ronald, P. C. Lab to farm: applying research on plant genetics and genomics to crop improvement. PLoS Biol. 12, e1001878 (2014).
Sun, Y., Shang, L., Zhu, Q.-H., Fan, L. & Guo, L. Twenty years of plant genome sequencing: achievements and challenges. Trends Plant Sci. 27, 391â401 (2022).
Bennetzen, J. L. & Ma, J. The genetic colinearity of rice and other cereals on the basis of genomic sequence analysis. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 6, 128â133 (2003).
Carlson, E. A. H. J. Mullerâs contributions to mutation research. Mutat. Res. 752, 1â5 (2013).
Simmonds, N. W. Bandwagons I Have Known. Tropical Agriculture Association Newsletter December 1991, 7â10 (Tropical Agriculture Association International, 1991).
Davey, J. W. et al. Genome-wide genetic marker discovery and genotyping using next-generation sequencing. Nat. Rev. Genet. 12, 499â510 (2011).
Schneeberger, K. et al. SHOREmap: simultaneous mapping and mutation identification by deep sequencing. Nat. Methods 6, 550â551 (2009).
Yu, J. et al. A unified mixed-model method for association mapping that accounts for multiple levels of relatedness. Nat. Genet. 38, 203â208 (2006).
Rhie, A. et al. Towards complete and error-free genome assemblies of all vertebrate species. Nature 592, 737â746 (2021).
Alkan, C., Coe, B. P. & Eichler, E. E. Genome structural variation discovery and genotyping. Nat. Rev. Genet. 12, 363â376 (2011).
Ho, S. S., Urban, A. E. & Mills, R. E. Structural variation in the sequencing era. Nat. Rev. Genet. 21, 171â189 (2020).
Lei, L. et al. Plant pan-genomics comes of age. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 72, 411â435 (2021).
Orlando, L. et al. Ancient DNA analysis. Nat. Rev. Methods Primers 1, 14 (2021).
Tanksley, S. D., Young, N. D., Paterson, A. H. & Bonierbale, M. W. RFLP mapping in plant breeding: new tools for an old science. Bio/Technology 7, 257â264 (1989).
Rafalski, J. A. Association genetics in crop improvement. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 13, 174â180 (2010).
Bernardo, R. Bandwagons I, too, have known. Theor. Appl. Genet. 129, 2323â2332 (2016).
Holland, J. B. Genetic architecture of complex traits in plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 10, 156â161 (2007).
Korte, A. & Farlow, A. The advantages and limitations of trait analysis with GWAS: a review. Plant Methods 9, 29 (2013).
Distelfeld, A., Li, C. & Dubcovsky, J. Regulation of flowering in temperate cereals. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 12, 178â184 (2009).
Comadran, J. et al. Natural variation in a homolog of Antirrhinum CENTRORADIALIS contributed to spring growth habit and environmental adaptation in cultivated barley. Nat. Genet. 44, 1388â1392 (2012).
Cheng, S. et al. Harnessing landrace diversity empowers wheat breeding. Nature 632, 823â831 (2024).
Wulff, B. B. & Krattinger, S. G. The long road to engineering durable disease resistance in wheat. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 73, 270â275 (2022).
Athiyannan, N. et al. Long-read genome sequencing of bread wheat facilitates disease resistance gene cloning. Nat. Genet. 54, 227â231 (2022). A good example of how the recent progress in genome sequencing has made gene isolation easier.
Meuwissen, T. H., Hayes, B. J. & Goddard, M. Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics 157, 1819â1829 (2001).
Lin, Z., Hayes, B. J. & Daetwyler, H. D. Genomic selection in crops, trees and forages: a review. Crop Pasture Sci. 65, 1177â1191 (2014).
Rembe, M., Zhao, Y., Jiang, Y. & Reif, J. C. Reciprocal recurrent genomic selection: an attractive tool to leverage hybrid wheat breeding. Theor. Appl. Genet. 132, 687â698 (2019).
Poland, J. & Rutkoski, J. Advances and challenges in genomic selection for disease resistance. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 54, 79â98 (2016).
Zhou, Y. et al. Graph pangenome captures missing heritability and empowers tomato breeding. Nature 606, 527â534 (2022). Structural variants derived from pangenomes improve the accuracy of quantitative genetic analyses.
Jensen, S. E. et al. A sorghum practical haplotype graph facilitates genome-wide imputation and cost-effective genomic prediction. Plant Genome 13, e20009 (2020).
Seyum, E. G. et al. Genomic selection in tropical perennial crops and plantation trees: a review. Mol. Breed. 42, 58 (2022).
Wolfe, M. D. et al. Prospects for genomic selection in cassava breeding. Plant Genome 10, https://doi.org/10.3835/plantgenome2017.03.0015 (2017).
Flor, H. H. Current status of the gene-for-gene concept. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 9, 275â296 (1971).
Tamborski, J. & Krasileva, K. V. Evolution of plant NLRs: from natural history to precise modifications. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 71, 355â378 (2020).
Barragan, A. C. & Weigel, D. Plant NLR diversity: the known unknowns of pan-NLRomes. Plant Cell 33, 814â831 (2021).
Moore, J. W. et al. A recently evolved hexose transporter variant confers resistance to multiple pathogens in wheat. Nat. Genet. 47, 1494â1498 (2015).
Krattinger, S. G. et al. A putative ABC transporter confers durable resistance to multiple fungal pathogens in wheat. Science 323, 1360â1363 (2009).
Ercoli, M. F. et al. Plant immunity: rice XA21-mediated resistance to bacterial infection. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2121568119 (2022).
Jupe, F. et al. Resistance gene enrichment sequencing (RenSeq) enables reannotation of the NB-LRR gene family from sequenced plant genomes and rapid mapping of resistance loci in segregating populations. Plant J. 76, 530â544 (2013).
Hafeez, A. N. et al. Creation and judicious application of a wheat resistance gene atlas. Mol. Plant 14, 1053â1070 (2021).
Guo, Y. et al. Population genomics of Puccinia graminis f.sp. tritici highlights the role of admixture in the origin of virulent wheat rust races. Nat. Commun. 13, 6287 (2022).
Seong, K. & Krasileva, K. V. Prediction of effector protein structures from fungal phytopathogens enables evolutionary analyses. Nat. Microbiol. 8, 174â187 (2023).
Förderer, A. et al. A wheat resistosome defines common principles of immune receptor channels. Nature 610, 532â539 (2022).
Zhao, Y.-B. et al. Pathogen effector AvrSr35 triggers Sr35 resistosome assembly via a direct recognition mechanism. Sci. Adv. 8, eabq5108 (2022).
Ma, S. et al. Direct pathogen-induced assembly of an NLR immune receptor complex to form a holoenzyme. Science 370, eabe3069 (2020).
Jumper, J. et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 596, 583â589 (2021).
Frankel, O. H. Genetic conservation: our evolutionary responsibility. Genetics 78, 53â65 (1974).
Altieri, M. A. & Merrick, L. In situ conservation of crop genetic resources through maintenance of traditional farming systems. Econ. Bot. 41, 86â96 (1987).
Meilleur, B. A. & Hodgkin, T. In situ conservation of crop wild relatives: status and trends. Biodivers. Conserv. 13, 663â684 (2004).
Marden, E., Sackville Hamilton, R., Halewood, M. & McCouch, S. International agreements and the plant genetics research community: a guide to practice. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 120, e2205773119 (2023).
Mascher, M. et al. Genebank genomics bridges the gap between the conservation of crop diversity and plant breeding. Nat. Genet. 51, 1076â1081 (2019).
Sansaloni, C. et al. Diversity analysis of 80,000 wheat accessions reveals consequences and opportunities of selection footprints. Nat. Commun. 11, 4572 (2020).
Schulthess, A. W. et al. Genomics-informed prebreeding unlocks the diversity in genebanks for wheat improvement. Nat. Genet. 54, 1544â1552 (2022). Genomics helps to bridge the gap between the conservation of plant genetic resources and practical breeding.
Milner, S. G. et al. Genebank genomics highlights the diversity of a global barley collection. Nat. Genet. 51, 319â326 (2019).
Romay, M. C. et al. Comprehensive genotyping of the USA national maize inbred seed bank. Genome Biol. 14, R55 (2013).
Wang, W. et al. Genomic variation in 3,010 diverse accessions of Asian cultivated rice. Nature 557, 43â49 (2018).
McCouch, S. R., McNally, K. L., Wang, W. & Sackville Hamilton, R. Genomics of gene banks: a case study in rice. Am. J. Bot. 99, 407â423 (2012).
De Beukelaer, H., Davenport, G. F. & Fack, V. Core Hunter 3: flexible core subset selection. BMC Bioinformatics 19, 203 (2018).
Yu, X. et al. Genomic prediction contributing to a promising global strategy to turbocharge gene banks. Nat. Plants 2, 16150 (2016).
Bhullar, N. K., Street, K., Mackay, M., Yahiaoui, N. & Keller, B. Unlocking wheat genetic resources for the molecular identification of previously undescribed functional alleles at the Pm3 resistance locus. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 9519â9524 (2009).
Milne, R. J. et al. The wheat Lr67 gene from the Sugar Transport Protein 13 family confers multipathogen resistance in barley. Plant Physiol. 179, 1285â1297 (2019).
Risk, J. M. et al. The wheat Lr34 gene provides resistance against multiple fungal pathogens in barley. Plant Biotechnol. J. 11, 847â854 (2013).
Luo, M. et al. A five-transgene cassette confers broad-spectrum resistance to a fungal rust pathogen in wheat. Nat. Biotechnol. 39, 561â566 (2021).
Wulff, B. B. & Moscou, M. J. Strategies for transferring resistance into wheat: from wide crosses to GM cassettes. Frontiers Plant Sci. 5, 692 (2014).
Athiyannan, N. et al. Long-read genome sequencing of bread wheat facilitates disease resistance gene cloning. Nat. Genet. 54, 227â231 (2022).
Wang, Y. et al. An unusual tandem kinase fusion protein confers leaf rust resistance in wheat. Nat. Genet. 55, 914â920 (2023).
Cavalet-Giorsa, E. et al. Origin and evolution of the bread wheat D genome. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07808-z (2024).
Cardi, T. et al. CRISPR/Cas-mediated plant genome editing: outstanding challenges a decade after implementation. Trends Plant Sci. 28, 1144â1165 (2023).
Watson, A. et al. Speed breeding is a powerful tool to accelerate crop research and breeding. Nat. Plants 4, 23â29 (2018).
Cha, J.-K. et al. Speed vernalization to accelerate generation advance in winter cereal crops. Mol. Plant 15, 1300â1309 (2022).
Mascher, M. et al. A chromosome conformation capture ordered sequence of the barley genome. Nature 544, 427â433 (2017).
The International Wheat Genome Sequencing Consortium. Shifting the limits in wheat research and breeding using a fully annotated reference genome. Science 361, eaar7191 (2018). In the past, large international consortia were needed to assemble reference sequences of large crop genomes.
Jayakodi, M. et al. The barley pan-genome reveals the hidden legacy of mutation breeding. Nature 588, 284â289 (2020).
Zhou, Y. et al. Pan-genome inversion index reveals evolutionary insights into the subpopulation structure of Asian rice. Nat. Commun. 14, 1567 (2023).
Przewieslik-Allen, A. M. et al. The role of gene flow and chromosomal instability in shaping the bread wheat genome. Nat. Plants 7, 172â183 (2021).
van Rengs, W. M. J. et al. A chromosome scale tomato genome built from complementary PacBio and Nanopore sequences alone reveals extensive linkage drag during breeding. Plant J. 110, 572â588 (2022).
Wendler, N. et al. Bulbosum to go: a toolbox to utilize Hordeum vulgare/bulbosum introgressions for breeding and beyond. Mol. Plant 8, 1507â1519 (2015).
Mieulet, D. et al. Unleashing meiotic crossovers in crops. Nat. Plants 4, 1010â1016 (2018). Single genes can have large effects on the recombination landscape.
Rönspies, M., Dorn, A., Schindele, P. & Puchta, H. CRISPRâCas-mediated chromosome engineering for crop improvement and synthetic biology. Nat. Plants 7, 566â573 (2021).
Schmidt, C. et al. Changing local recombination patterns in Arabidopsis by CRISPR/Cas mediated chromosome engineering. Nat. Commun. 11, 4418 (2020).
Schwartz, C. et al. CRISPRâCas9-mediated 75.5-Mb inversion in maize. Nat. Plants 6, 1427â1431 (2020).
Bartlett, M. E., Moyers, B. T., Man, J., Subramaniam, B. & Makunga, N. P. The power and perils of de novo domestication using genome editing. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 74, 727â750 (2023).
Yu, H. & Li, J. Breeding future crops to feed the world through de novo domestication. Nat. Commun. 13, 1171 (2022).
Hanak, T., Madsen, C. K. & Brinch-Pedersen, H. Genome editing-accelerated re-domestication (GEaReD)âa new major direction in plant breeding. Biotechnol. J. 17, 2100545 (2022).
Zhang, S. et al. Sustained productivity and agronomic potential of perennial rice. Nat. Sust. 6, 28â38 (2023).
Singh, D., Buhmann, A. K., Flowers, T. J., Seal, C. E. & Papenbrock, J. Salicornia as a crop plant in temperate regions: selection of genetically characterized ecotypes and optimization of their cultivation conditions. AoB Plants 6, plu071 (2014).
Lenser, T. & TheiÃen, G. Molecular mechanisms involved in convergent crop domestication. Trends Plant Sci. 18, 704â714 (2013).
Larson, S. et al. Genome mapping of quantitative trait loci (QTL) controlling domestication traits of intermediate wheatgrass (Thinopyrum intermedium). Theor. Appl. Genet. 132, 2325â2351 (2019).
Stetter, M. G., Gates, D. J., Mei, W. & Ross-Ibarra, J. How to make a domesticate. Curr. Biol. 27, R896âR900 (2017).
Abbo, S. et al. Plant domestication versus crop evolution: a conceptual framework for cereals and grain legumes. Trends Plant Sci. 19, 351â360 (2014).
Fuller, D. Q. Contrasting patterns in crop domestication and domestication rates: recent archaeobotanical insights from the Old World. Ann. Bot. 100, 903â924 (2007).
Lemmon, Z. H. et al. Rapid improvement of domestication traits in an orphan crop by genome editing. Nat. Plants 4, 766â770 (2018). Agronomically relevant traits in a minor crop were improved by targeted mutagenesis.
Li, T. et al. Domestication of wild tomato is accelerated by genome editing. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 1160â1163 (2018).
Fernie, A. R. & Yan, J. De novo domestication: an alternative route toward new crops for the future. Mol. Plant 12, 615â631 (2019).
Bevan, M. W. et al. Genomic innovation for crop improvement. Nature 543, 346â354 (2017).
Khoury, C. K. et al. Crop genetic erosion: understanding and responding to loss of crop diversity. New Phytol. 233, 84â118 (2022).
Brown, W. L. Genetic diversity and genetic vulnerabilityâan appraisal. Econ. Bot. 37, 4â12 (1983).
Mayer, M. et al. Discovery of beneficial haplotypes for complex traits in maize landraces. Nat. Commun. 11, 4954 (2020).
Stephan, W. Genetic hitchhiking versus background selection: the controversy and its implications. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 365, 1245â1253 (2010).
Yang, J. et al. Incomplete dominance of deleterious alleles contributes substantially to trait variation and heterosis in maize. PLoS Genet. 13, e1007019 (2017).
Wang, L. et al. The interplay of demography and selection during maize domestication and expansion. Genome Biol. 18, 215 (2017).
Lozano, R. et al. Comparative evolutionary genetics of deleterious load in sorghum and maize. Nat. Plants 7, 17â24 (2021).
Liu, Q., Zhou, Y., Morrell, P. L. & Gaut, B. S. Deleterious variants in Asian rice and the potential cost of domestication. Mol. Biol. Evol. 34, 908â924 (2017).
Cingolani, P. et al. A program for annotating and predicting the effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms, SnpEff: SNPs in the genome of Drosophila melanogaster strain w1118; iso-2; iso-3. Fly 6, 80â92 (2012).
Ng, P. C. & Henikoff, S. SIFT: predicting amino acid changes that affect protein function. Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 3812â3814 (2003).
Khan, A. W. et al. Super-pangenome by Integrating the wild side of a species for accelerated crop improvement. Trends Plant Sci. 25, 148â158 (2019).
Gao, H. et al. The landscape of tolerated genetic variation in humans and primates. Science 380, eabn8153 (2023).
Ramstein, G. P. & Buckler, E. S. Prediction of evolutionary constraint by genomic annotations improves functional prioritization of genomic variants in maize. Genome Biol. 23, 183 (2022).
Wallace, J. G., Rodgers-Melnick, E. & Buckler, E. S. On the road to breeding 4.0: unraveling the good, the bad, and the boring of crop quantitative genomics. Annu. Rev. Genet. 52, 421â444 (2018).
Roze, D. A simple expression for the strength of selection on recombination generated by interference among mutations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2022805118 (2021).
Gabriel, W., Lynch, M. & Bürger, R. Mullerâs ratchet and mutational meltdowns. Evolution 47, 1744â1757 (1993).
Naeem, M., Demirel, U., Yousaf, M. F., Caliskan, S. & Caliskan, M. E. Overview on domestication, breeding, genetic gain and improvement of tuber quality traits of potato using fast forwarding technique (GWAS): a review. Plant Breed. 140, 519â542 (2021).
Jansky, S. H. et al. Reinventing potato as a diploid inbred lineâbased crop. Crop Sci. 56, 1412â1422 (2016).
ter Steeg, E. M. S., Struik, P. C., Visser, R. G. F. & Lindhout, P. Crucial factors for the feasibility of commercial hybrid breeding in food crops. Nat. Plants 8, 463â473 (2022).
Zhou, Q. et al. Haplotype-resolved genome analyses of a heterozygous diploid potato. Nat. Genet. 52, 1018â1023 (2020).
Sun, H. et al. Chromosome-scale and haplotype-resolved genome assembly of a tetraploid potato cultivar. Nat. Genet. 54, 342â348 (2022).
Tang, D. et al. Genome evolution and diversity of wild and cultivated potatoes. Nature 606, 535â541 (2022). Initial analysis of a genus-wide pangenome of potato and its wild relatives.
Zhang, C. et al. The genetic basis of inbreeding depression in potato. Nat. Genet. 51, 374â378 (2019).
Wu, Y. et al. Phylogenomic discovery of deleterious mutations facilitates hybrid potato breeding. Cell 186, 2313â2328.e2315 (2023).
Ye, M. et al. Generation of self-compatible diploid potato by knockout of S-RNase. Nat. Plants 4, 651â654 (2018).
Mascher, M., Jayakodi, M. & Stein, N. The reinvention of potato. Cell Res. 31, 1144â1145 (2021).
Servin, B., Martin, O. C., Mézard, M. & Hospital, F. Toward a theory of marker-assisted gene pyramiding. Genetics 168, 513â523 (2004).
Hurni, S. et al. The powdery mildew resistance gene Pm8 derived from rye is suppressed by its wheat ortholog Pm3. Plant J. 79, 904â913 (2014).
Cordell, H. J. Epistasis: what it means, what it doesnât mean, and statistical methods to detect it in humans. Hum. Mol. Genet. 11, 2463â2468 (2002).
Soyk, S. et al. Bypassing negative epistasis on yield in tomato imposed by a domestication gene. Cell 169, 1142â1155.e1112 (2017).
Soyk, S., Benoit, M. & Lippman, Z. B. New horizons for dissecting epistasis in crop quantitative trait variation. Annu. Rev. Genet. 54, 287â307 (2020).
Jiang, Y., Schmidt, R. H., Zhao, Y. & Reif, J. C. A quantitative genetic framework highlights the role of epistatic effects for grain-yield heterosis in bread wheat. Nat. Genet. 49, 1741â1746 (2017).
Bouché, F., Lobet, G., Tocquin, P. & Périlleux, C. FLOR-ID: an interactive database of flowering-time gene networks in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, D1167âD1171 (2016).
Chen, D., Yan, W., Fu, L.-Y. & Kaufmann, K. Architecture of gene regulatory networks controlling flower development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nat. Commun. 9, 4534 (2018).
Ahsan, A. et al. Identification of epistasis loci underlying rice flowering time by controlling population stratification and polygenic effect. DNA Res. 26, 119â130 (2018).
Mathew, B., Léon, J., Sannemann, W. & Sillanpää, M. J. Detection of epistasis for flowering time using Bayesian multilocus estimation in a barley MAGIC population. Genetics 208, 525â536 (2018).
Durand, E. et al. Flowering time in maize: linkage and epistasis at a major effect locus. Genetics 190, 1547â1562 (2012).
Padmarasu, S., Himmelbach, A., Mascher, M. & Stein, N. In situ Hi-C for plants: an improved method to detect long-range chromatin interactions. Methods Mol. Biol. 1933, 441â472 (2019).
Liu, L. et al. Enhancing grain-yield-related traits by CRISPRâCas9 promoter editing of maize CLE genes. Nat. Plants 7, 287â294 (2021).
Aguirre, L., Hendelman, A., Hutton, S. F., McCandlish, D. M. & Lippman, Z. B. Idiosyncratic and dose-dependent epistasis drives variation in tomato fruit size. Science 382, 315â320 (2023). On the molecular genetics of regulatory variation in tomato.
Boyle, E. A., Li, Y. I. & Pritchard, J. K. An expanded view of complex traits: from polygenic to omnigenic. Cell 169, 1177â1186 (2017).
Zhao, L. et al. Integrative analysis of reference epigenomes in 20 rice varieties. Nat. Commun. 11, 2658 (2020).
Han, T. et al. An epigenetic basis of inbreeding depression in maize. Sci. Adv. 7, eabg5442 (2021).
Thiel, J. et al. Transcriptional landscapes of floral meristems in barley. Sci. Adv. 7, eabf0832 (2021).
Zhang, T.-Q., Chen, Y., Liu, Y., Lin, W.-H. & Wang, J.-W. Single-cell transcriptome atlas and chromatin accessibility landscape reveal differentiation trajectories in the rice root. Nat. Commun. 12, 2053 (2021).
Watt, M. et al. Phenotyping: new windows into the plant for breeders. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 71, 689â712 (2020).
Araus, J. L. et al. Crop phenotyping in a context of global change: what to measure and how to do it. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 64, 592â618 (2022).
Sweet, D. D., Tirado, S. B., Springer, N. M., Hirsch, C. N. & Hirsch, C. D. Opportunities and challenges in phenotyping row crops using drone-based RGB imaging. Plant Phenome J. 5, e20044 (2022).
Barker, J. et al. Development of a field-based high-throughput mobile phenotyping platform. Comput. Electron. Agric. 122, 74â85 (2016).
Araus, J. L. & Cairns, J. E. Field high-throughput phenotyping: the new crop breeding frontier. Trends Plant Sci. 19, 52â61 (2014).
Heuermann, M. C., Knoch, D., Junker, A. & Altmann, T. Natural plant growth and development achieved in the IPK PhenoSphere by dynamic environment simulation. Nat. Commun. 14, 5783 (2023).
Perez de Souza, L., Alseekh, S., Scossa, F. & Fernie, A. R. Ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography high-resolution mass spectrometry variants for metabolomics research. Nat. Methods 18, 733â746 (2021).
Dubin, M. J. et al. DNA methylation in Arabidopsis has a genetic basis and shows evidence of local adaptation. eLife 4, e05255 (2015).
Nica, A. C. & Dermitzakis, E. T. Expression quantitative trait loci: present and future. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 368, 20120362 (2013).
Monroe, J. G. et al. Mutation bias reflects natural selection in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature 602, 101â105 (2022).
Araus, J. L., Kefauver, S. C., Zaman-Allah, M., Olsen, M. S. & Cairns, J. E. Translating high-throughput phenotyping into genetic gain. Trends Plant Sci. 23, 451â466 (2018).
Hu, Y. & Schmidhalter, U. Opportunity and challenges of phenotyping plant salt tolerance. Trends Plant Sci. 28, 552â566 (2023).
Reynolds, M. et al. Breeder friendly phenotyping. Plant Sci. 295, 110396 (2020).
Awada, L., Phillips, P. W. B. & Smyth, S. J. The adoption of automated phenotyping by plant breeders. Euphytica 214, 148 (2018).
Papoutsoglou, E. A., Athanasiadis, I. N., Visser, R. G. F. & Finkers, R. The benefits and struggles of FAIR data: the case of reusing plant phenotyping data. Sci. Data 10, 457 (2023).
Papoutsoglou, E. A. et al. Enabling reusability of plant phenomic datasets with MIAPPE 1.1. New Phytol. 227, 260â273 (2020).
Selby, P. et al. BrAPIâan application programming interface for plant breeding applications. Bioinformatics 35, 4147â4155 (2019).
Bell, G., Hey, T. & Szalay, A. Beyond the data deluge. Science 323, 1297â1298 (2009).
Jones, J. W. et al. Brief history of agricultural systems modeling. Agric. Syst. 155, 240â254 (2017).
Chenu, K. et al. Contribution of crop models to adaptation in wheat. Trends Plant Sci. 22, 472â490 (2017).
De Souza, A. P. et al. Soybean photosynthesis and crop yield are improved by accelerating recovery from photoprotection. Science 377, 851â854 (2022).
Habier, D., Fernando, R. L. & Garrick, D. J. Genomic BLUP decoded: a look into the black box of genomic prediction. Genetics 194, 597â607 (2013).
Hammer, G., Messina, C., Wu, A. & Cooper, M. Biological reality and parsimony in crop modelsâwhy we need both in crop improvement! in silico Plants 1, diz010 (2019).
Roeder, A. H. K. et al. Fifteen compelling open questions in plant cell biology. Plant Cell 34, 72â102 (2021). A collection of thought-provoking perspectives on future directions in basic plant science.
Alexandratos, N. & Bruinsma, J. World agriculture towards 2030/2050: the 2012 revision. ESA Working Paper 12-03 (FAO, 2012).
Roser, M. Breaking out of the Malthusian trap: How pandemics allow us to understand why our ancestors were stuck in poverty. Our World in Data https://ourworldindata.org/breaking-the-malthusian-trap (2020).
Ritchie, H., Rosado P. & Roser, M. Hunger and Undernourishment. Our World in Data https://ourworldindata.org/hunger-and-undernourishment (2023).
Ghazal, H. et al. Plant genomics in Africa: present and prospects. Plant J. 107, 21â36 (2021).
Jamnadass, R. et al. Enhancing African orphan crops with genomics. Nat. Genet. 52, 356â360 (2020).
VanBuren, R. et al. Exceptional subgenome stability and functional divergence in the allotetraploid Ethiopian cereal teff. Nat. Commun. 11, 884 (2020).
Wang, M. et al. Improved assembly and annotation of the sesame genome. DNA Res. 29, dsac041 (2022).
Qi, W. et al. The haplotype-resolved chromosome pairs of a heterozygous diploid African cassava cultivar reveal novel pan-genome and allele-specific transcriptome features. GigaScience 11, giac028 (2022).
Kuon, J.-E. et al. Haplotype-resolved genomes of geminivirus-resistant and geminivirus-susceptible African cassava cultivars. BMC Biol. 17, 75 (2019).
Varshney, R. K. et al. Achievements and prospects of genomics-assisted breeding in three legume crops of the semi-arid tropics. Biotechnol. Adv. 31, 1120â1134 (2013).
Mboowa, G., Sserwadda, I. & Aruhomukama, D. Genomics and bioinformatics capacity in Africa: no continent is left behind. Genome 64, 503â513 (2021).
Santantonio, N. et al. Strategies for effective use of genomic information in crop breeding programs serving Africa and South Asia. Frontiers Plant Sci 11, 353 (2020).
Poore, J. & Nemecek, T. Reducing foodâs environmental impacts through producers and consumers. Science 360, 987â992 (2018). This paper presents strong arguments for why environmental concerns matter to everyone, including plant breeders.
